Voting, Speechmaking, and the Dimensions of Conict in the US Senate

Legislative institutions structure and order the myriad topics addressed by legislators. Jointly considering both roll call votes and oor speech, we show that the contemporary US Senate is ordered around but two dimensions: one ideological and another capturing leadership. We characterize both word and vote choice in terms of the exact same ideal points and policy dimensions. These ndings emerge from our method, Sparse Factor Analysis (SFA), designed to combine vote and textual data when estimating ideal points, word aect, and the underlying dimensionality. This contrasts with the single dimension that emerges from an analysis of votes alone, and with the more numerous dimensions that emerge from analyzing speech alone. We then show how SFA can leverage common speech in order to impute missing data, to estimate rank-and-le ideal points using only their words and the vote history of party leaders, and even to scale newspaper editorials.

[1]  Morris P. Fiorina,et al.  Congress, keystone of the Washington establishment , 1977 .

[2]  G. Casella,et al.  The Bayesian Lasso , 2008 .

[3]  Jared S. Murray,et al.  Bayesian Gaussian Copula Factor Models for Mixed Data , 2011, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[4]  K. Shepsle.  Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models , 1979 .

[5]  Katherine A. Heller,et al.  Bayesian Exponential Family PCA , 2008, NIPS.

[6]  Andrew D. Martin,et al.  Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999 , 2002, Political Analysis.

[7]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts , 2013, Political Analysis.

[8]  David R. Mayhew.  Congress: The Electoral Connection , 1975 .

[9]  L. Sigelman,et al.  The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the U.S. House of Representatives , 1996, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  R. Cattell.  The Scientific Use of Factor Analysis in Behavioral and Life Sciences , 2012 .

[11]  K. Hill,et al.  Symbolic Speeches in the U.S. Senate and Their Representational Implications , 2002, The Journal of Politics.

[12]  C. Carvalho,et al.  A sparse factor analytic probit model for congressional voting patterns , 2012 .

[13]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators , 1996 .

[14]  Kenneth A. Shepsle,et al.  Structure-induced equilibrium and legislative choice , 1981 .

[15]  Radford M. Neal.  MCMC Using Hamiltonian Dynamics , 2011, 1206.1901.

[16]  Sven-Oliver Proksch,et al.  A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts , 2007 .

[17]  Sharad Goel,et al.  HORSESHOES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING AND LOCAL KERNEL METHODS , 2008, 0811.1477.

[18]  Kevin M. Quinn,et al.  Bayesian Factor Analysis for Mixed Ordinal and Continuous Responses , 2004, Political Analysis.

[19]  Burt L. Monroe,et al.  Fightin' Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict , 2008, Political Analysis.

[20]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[21]  D. Austen-Smith.  Information transmission in debate , 1990 .

[22]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences , 2009 .

[23]  Michael Kellermann,et al.  Estimating Ideal Points in the British House of Commons Using Early Day Motions , 2012 .

[24]  Adam Bonica,et al.  Mapping the Ideological Marketplace , 2013 .

[25]  Noah A. Smith,et al.  The Utility of Text: The Case of Amicus Briefs and the Supreme Court , 2014, AAAI.

[26]  L. Carin,et al.  Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Legislation and Votes , 2013 .

[27]  Tom S. Clark,et al.  Scaling Politically Meaningful Dimensions Using Texts and Votes , 2014 .

[28]  Curtis S. Signorino.  Strategic Interaction and the Statistical Analysis of International Conflict , 1999, American Political Science Review.

[29]  Adam Meirowitz,et al.  Integrating Voting Theory and Roll Call Analysis: A Framework , 2003, Political Analysis.

[30]  R. McKelvey,et al.  A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables , 1975 .

[31]  N. Schofield.  Transitivity of preferences on a smooth manifold of alternatives , 1977 .

[32]  Sanjoy Dasgupta,et al.  A Generalization of Principal Components Analysis to the Exponential Family , 2001, NIPS.

[33]  Justin Grimmer,et al.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press Releases , 2010, Political Analysis.

[34]  Simon Jackman,et al.  Democracy as a Latent Variable , 2008 .

[35]  John H. Aldrich.  Why parties? : the origin and transformation of political parties in America , 1995 .

[36]  R. McKelvey.  Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control , 1976 .

[37]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[38]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[39]  Krishna K Ladha,et al.  A spatial model of legislative voting with perceptual error , 1991 .

[40]  Mathew D. McCubbins,et al.  Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House , 1993 .

[41]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs , 2010 .

[42]  Sean Gerrish,et al.  How They Vote: Issue-Adjusted Models of Legislative Behavior , 2012, NIPS.

[43]  David G. Rand,et al.  Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses , 2014, American Journal of Political Science.

[44]  Joshua D. Clinton,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[45]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[46]  Thomas W. Gilligan,et al.  Collective Decisionmaking and Standing Committees: An Informational Rationale for Restrictive Amendment Procedures , 1987 .

[47]  Jacob M. Montgomery,et al.  Polarization and Ideology: Partisan Sources of Low Dimensionality in Scaled Roll Call Analyses , 2014, Political Analysis.