Acquisition War-Gaming Technique for Acquiring Future Complex Systems: Modeling and Simulation Results for Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract

This paper provides a high-level discussion and propositions of frameworks and models for acquisition strategy of complex systems. In particular, it presents an innovative system engineering approach to model the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition process and offers several optimization modules including simulation models using game theory and war-gaming concepts. Our frameworks employ Advanced Game-based Mathematical Framework (AGMF) and Unified Game-based Acquisition Framework (UGAF), and related advanced simulation and mathematical models that include a set of War-Gaming Engines (WGEs) implemented in MATLAB statistical optimization models. WGEs are defined as a set of algorithms, characterizing the Program and Technical Baseline (PTB), technology enablers, architectural solutions, contract type, contract parameters and associated incentives, and industry bidding position. As a proof of concept, Aerospace, in collaboration with the North Carolina State University (NCSU) and University of Hawaii (UH), successfully applied and extended the proposed frameworks and decision models to determine the optimum contract parameters and incentives for a Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract. As a result, we can suggest a set of acquisition strategies that ensure the optimization of the PTB.

[1]  Tung Bui,et al.  Web Services for Negotiation and Bargaining in Electronic Markets: Design Requirements, Proof-of-Concepts, and Potential Applications to e-Procurement , 2006 .

[2]  Symeon Papavassiliou,et al.  Energy-efficient subcarrier allocation in SC-FDMA wireless networks based on multilateral model of bargaining , 2013, 2013 IFIP Networking Conference.

[3]  Tien M. Nguyen,et al.  A Resilient Program technical baseline framework for future space systems , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[4]  Blake A. Rogers,et al.  War-gaming application for future space systems acquisition: MATLAB implementation of war-gaming acquisition models and simulation results , 2017, Defense + Security.

[5]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  War-Gaming Applications for Achieving Optimum Acquisition of Future Space Systems , 2018 .

[6]  James Hant,et al.  Owning the program technical baseline for future space systems acquisition: program technical baseline tracking tool , 2017, Defense + Security.

[7]  A. Rubinstein Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model , 1982 .

[8]  Tien M. Nguyen,et al.  War-gaming application for future space systems acquisition part 2: acquisition and bidding war-gaming modeling and simulation approaches for FFP and FPIF , 2017, Defense + Security.

[9]  Geir B. Asheim,et al.  A unique solution to n-person sequential bargaining , 1992 .

[10]  Tung X. Bui,et al.  Solving the order promising impasse using multi-criteria decision analysis and negotiation , 2013, Logist. Res..

[11]  Tien M. Nguyen,et al.  War-gaming application for future space systems acquisition , 2016, SPIE Defense + Security.

[12]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  A Dss for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making , 1984, ICIS.