Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education: Strategies and Efficacy Evidence
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] David Wood,et al. Vygotsky, Tutoring and Learning. , 1996 .
[2] Ömer Geban,et al. Effectiveness of Case-Based Learning Instruction on Epistemological Beliefs and Attitudes Toward Chemistry , 2011 .
[3] Benjamin Naumann. The Architecture Of Cognition , 2016 .
[4] P. Pintrich,et al. The Development of Epistemological Theories: Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing and Their Relation to Learning , 1997 .
[5] F. Abd‐El‐Khalick. Examining the Sources for our Understandings about Science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education , 2012 .
[6] Kathleen Hogan,et al. Comparing the Epistemological Underpinnings of Students' and Scientists' Reasoning about Conclusions. , 2001 .
[7] Jerry Glenn,et al. A qualitative study of six medical students in a problem-based curriculum: Toward a situated model of self-regulation. , 2001 .
[8] Brian R. Belland,et al. Distributed Cognition as a Lens to Understand the Effects of Scaffolds: The Role of Transfer of Responsibility , 2011 .
[9] Marcia C. Linn,et al. Designing the Knowledge Integration Environment , 2000 .
[10] Douglas B. Clark,et al. The knowledge integration perspective: connections across research and education , 2013 .
[11] M. Segers,et al. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .
[12] Francis Crick,et al. The double helix: a personal view , 1974, Nature.
[13] Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al. Fish Swim, Rocks Sit, and Lungs Breathe: Expert-Novice Understanding of Complex Systems , 2007 .
[14] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[15] D. Allen,et al. What is Problem-Based Learning? , 2006 .
[16] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. A knowledge engineering approach to developing mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2010, Comput. Educ..
[17] Joseph Krajcik,et al. The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments , 1996, CHI.
[18] Sharon J. Lynch. “Science for all” is not equal to “one size fits all”: Linguistic and cultural diversity and science education reform , 2001 .
[19] C Johnson,et al. Oncology Thinking Cap: Scaffolded Use of a Simulation to Learn Clinical Trial Design , 2001, Teaching and learning in medicine.
[20] Rose M. Marra,et al. Collaboration as a Means to Building Capacity: Results and Future Directions of the National Girls Collaborative Project , 2008 .
[21] Kennon M. Sheldon,et al. Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. , 2010 .
[22] Abigail Jurist Levy,et al. Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002 , 2010 .
[23] Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al. The Difficulty Factors Approach to the Design of Lessons in Intelligent Tutor Curricula , 2007, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..
[24] H. Schmidt,et al. Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning Does Work: A Meta-Analysis of Curricular Comparisons Involving a Single Medical School , 2009 .
[25] Jim Hanan,et al. Transforming the Social Practices of Learning with Representations: A Study of Disciplinary Discourse , 2013 .
[26] R. C. Macridis. A review , 1963 .
[27] Ismael Rafols,et al. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.
[28] Frank M. Pajares,et al. Sources of science self‐efficacy beliefs of middle school students , 2006 .
[29] D. Boud,et al. Aligning assessment with long‐term learning , 2006 .
[30] W. Sandoval. Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .
[31] Mary Helen Ulicsak. 'How did it know we weren't talking?': An investigation into the impact of self-assessments and feedback in a group activity , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[32] J. Thistlethwaite,et al. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23 , 2012, Medical teacher.
[33] Peggy A. Ertmer,et al. Jumping the PBL Implementation Hurdle: Supporting the Efforts of K-12 Teachers. , 2006 .
[34] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .
[35] Ronald N. Giere,et al. The Role of Agency in Distributed Cognitive Systems , 2006, Philosophy of Science.
[36] Yuichiro Anzai,et al. Internal Models in Physics Problem Solving , 1984 .
[37] Susan Craw,et al. Case-Based Reasoning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.
[38] Susan M. Land,et al. Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .
[39] Toni Kempler Rogat,et al. Teachers’ Autonomy-Relevant Practices within an Inquiry-Based Science Curricular Context: Extending the Range of Academically Significant Autonomy-Supportive Practices , 2014, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[40] Dirk Ifenthaler,et al. Model-based reasoning , 2013, Comput. Educ..
[41] Jianwei Zhang,et al. Triple scheme of learning support design for scientific discovery learning based on computer simulation: experimental research , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[42] Daniel L. Schwartz,et al. Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .
[43] C. Schunn,et al. Engagement and Achievements: A Case Study of Design-Based Learning in a Science Context. , 2008 .
[44] Robert M. Bernard,et al. Instructional Interventions Affecting Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions: A Stage 1 Meta-Analysis , 2008 .
[45] Brian R. Belland,et al. Portraits of middle school students constructing evidence-based arguments during problem-based learning: the impact of computer-based scaffolds , 2010 .
[46] B. Belland. The Role of Construct Definition in the Creation of Formative Assessments in Game-Based Learning , 2012 .
[47] Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al. Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[48] Andrée Tiberghien,et al. An Epistemological Approach to Modeling: Cases Studies and Implications for Science Teaching , 2008 .
[49] Kent J. Crippen,et al. Scaffolded Inquiry-Based Instruction with Technology: A Signature Pedagogy for STEM Education , 2012 .
[50] C-Y. Lin,et al. Scaffolding wiki-supported collaborative learning for small-group projects and whole-class collaborative knowledge building , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[51] Yair Neuman,et al. Pupils' evaluation and generation of evidence and explanation in argumentation. , 2005, The British journal of educational psychology.
[52] Richard E. Clark,et al. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .
[53] Sean Brophy,et al. Advancing Engineering Education in P‐12 Classrooms , 2008 .
[54] D. Finfgeld,et al. Metasynthesis: The State of the Art—So Far , 2003, Qualitative health research.
[55] Joseph Krajcik,et al. A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[56] Marcia C. Linn,et al. Scaffolding knowledge integration through curricular depth , 2000 .
[57] Thomas Brush,et al. The Use of Embedded Scaffolds with Hypermedia-Supported Student-Centered Learning , 2001 .
[58] Irit Sasson,et al. Chemical understanding and graphing skills in an honors case‐based computerized chemistry laboratory environment: The value of bidirectional visual and textual representations , 2008 .
[59] S. Barab,et al. What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? , 2007 .
[60] Thomas M. Schwen,et al. Contingent scaffolding strategies in computer-based learning environments , 2001 .
[61] D. T. Vernon,et al. Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[62] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education , 2005 .
[63] Sanneke Bolhuis,et al. Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: a multidimensional perspective , 2003 .
[64] Charles W. Anderson,et al. Reasoning about data in middle school science , 1999 .
[65] T. Kuhn,et al. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .
[66] Robert M. Gagné,et al. The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .
[67] Ton de Jong,et al. Scaffolding learners in designing investigation assignments for a computer simulation , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[68] Matthew W. Keefer,et al. Judging the Quality of Peer-Led Student Dialogues , 2000 .
[69] I E Belik. [In defense of a lecture]. , 1992, Klinicheskaia khirurgiia.
[70] L. Helle,et al. 'Ain't nothin' like the real thing'. Motivation and study processes on a work-based project course in information systems design. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.
[71] E. Lekalakala-Mokgele. Facilitation in problem-based learning: experiencing the locus of control. , 2010, Nurse education today.
[72] Thomas Brush,et al. Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments , 2002 .
[73] Deanna Kuhn,et al. Experimental analysis of the effective components of problem‐based learning , 2011 .
[74] Ton de Jong,et al. Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[75] Ann L. Brown,et al. Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities , 1984 .
[76] Paul Adams,et al. Next Generation Science Standards , 2013 .
[77] Susan M. Land,et al. A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions , 2004 .
[78] Rebecca Van de Vord. Distance students and online research: Promoting information literacy through media literacy , 2010, Internet High. Educ..
[79] Krista Glazewski,et al. A scaffolding framework to support the construction of evidence-based arguments among middle school students , 2008 .
[80] M. Azmitia,et al. Identity and Academic Success among Underrepresented Ethnic Minorities: An Interdisciplinary Review and Integration , 2011 .
[81] James D. Klein,et al. The Impact of Scaffolding and Student Achievement Levels in a Problem-based Learning Environment , 2007 .
[82] M. Sandelowski,et al. Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda , 2004, Qualitative health research.
[83] Min Liu,et al. The Transfer of Problem-Solving Skills from a Problem-Based Learning Environment , 2002 .
[84] Samuel B. Fee,et al. Conclusion: Building on the Strengths of Interdisciplinarity , 2012 .
[85] Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al. A concept map approach to developing collaborative Mindtools for context-aware ubiquitous learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..
[86] Susan M. Land,et al. Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio , 2003 .
[87] Luke A. Buckland,et al. Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .
[88] Brian R. Belland,et al. Preparing Students with 21st Century Skills: Integrating Scientific Knowledge, Skills, and Epistemic Beliefs in Middle School Science Curricula , 2015 .
[89] Elaine H. J. Yew,et al. The process of problem‐based learning: what works and why , 2011, Medical education.
[90] J. Bruner,et al. The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.
[91] Lisa D. Bendixen,et al. An Integrative Approach to Personal Epistemology: A Guiding Model , 2004 .
[92] Christian D. Schunn,et al. Identifying students’ perceptions of the important classroom features affecting learning aspects of a design-based learning environment , 2008 .
[93] Tali Tal,et al. Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances , 2007 .
[94] Derek C. Briggs,et al. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching , 2012 .
[95] M. Cole,et al. Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations , 1976 .
[96] Walter R. Borg,et al. Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. , 1996 .
[97] J. Krajcik,et al. Expert Models and Modeling Processes Associated with a Computer-Modeling Tool , 2006 .
[98] Gavriel Salomon,et al. Knowledge to Go: A Motivational and Dispositional View of Transfer , 2012 .
[99] B. Zimmerman. Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective , 1995 .
[100] Gregory R. Hancock,et al. Cognitive Complexity and the Comparability of Multiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Test Formats , 1994 .
[101] K. Koedinger,et al. Exploring the Assistance Dilemma in Experiments with Cognitive Tutors , 2007 .
[102] Keith E. Stanovich,et al. On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases , 2008 .
[103] David H. Jonassen,et al. Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving , 2002 .
[104] Paul J. Feltovich,et al. Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..
[105] Richard N. Van Eck,et al. The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills a computer-based instructional simulation game , 2002 .
[106] Janet L. Kolodner,et al. Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into Practice , 2003 .
[107] L.J. Leifer,et al. Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.
[108] John R. Anderson,et al. ACT-R: A Theory of Higher Level Cognition and Its Relation to Visual Attention , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[109] Jeannine E. Turner,et al. Emotional and Cognitive Self-Regulation Following Academic Shame , 2008 .
[110] Tina Seufert. Supporting Coherence Formation in Learning from Multiple Representations , 2003 .
[111] Brian R. Belland,et al. A Preliminary Meta-analysis On the Influence of Scaffolding Characteristics and Study and Assessment Quality on Cognitive Outcomes in STEM Education , 2014, CogSci.
[112] J. Eccles,et al. Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.
[113] M. Segers,et al. Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .
[114] Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al. Investigating Elementary Students' Scientific and Historical Argumentation , 2013 .
[115] L. Franklin,et al. Exploratory Experiments , 2005, Philosophy of Science.
[116] Charles B. Hodges,et al. Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course , 2012 .
[117] Iris Tabak,et al. Missing the point or missing the norms? Epistemological norms as predictors of students’ ability to identify fallacious arguments , 2004 .
[118] B. Hofer. Personal Epistemology Research: Implications for Learning and Teaching , 2001 .
[119] Kent J. Crippen,et al. Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning , 2006 .
[120] Kelly M. Deters,et al. Investigating a computerized scaffolding software for student designed science investigations , 2009 .
[121] David A. Gillam,et al. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .
[122] Michael A. Osborne,et al. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .
[123] Pierre Dillenbourg,et al. Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .
[124] L. Helle,et al. Project-Based Learning in Post-Secondary Education – Theory, Practice and Rubber Sling Shots , 2006 .
[125] P. Johnson-Laird. Mental models and deduction , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[126] K. VanLehn. The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .
[127] E. Deci,et al. The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .
[128] Barbara Means,et al. Cognitive task analysis as a basis for tutor development: Articulating abstract knowledge representations. , 1988 .
[129] David H. Jonassen,et al. Using Cognitive Tools to Represent Problems , 2003 .
[130] D. Jonassen,et al. Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments , 1999 .
[131] D. Kuhn. THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.
[132] B. Belland. Habitus, Scaffolding, and Problem-Based Learning: Why Teachers’ Experiences as Students Matter , 2012 .
[133] Woei Hung,et al. Theory to reality: a few issues in implementing problem-based learning , 2011 .
[134] S. Urbina. Essentials of Psychological Testing , 2005, PsyPag Quarterly.
[135] Stephen M. Fiore,et al. Scaffolding cognitive and metacognitive processes in low verbal ability learners: Use of diagrams in computer-based training environments , 2002 .
[136] C. Reigeluth,et al. The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education , 2008 .
[137] Richard H. Hall,et al. Using games to teach statics calculation procedures: Application and assessment , 2005, Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ..
[138] D. Hung,et al. Context–process authenticity in learning: implications for identity enculturation and boundary crossing , 2007 .
[139] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[140] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Personally‐Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation , 2007 .
[141] M. Anne Britt,et al. The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model , 2011 .
[142] H. Barrows. How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years , 1985 .
[143] Lucia Mason,et al. Prediction of students' argumentation skills about controversial topics by epistemological understanding , 2006 .
[144] Avi Kaplan,et al. Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies , 2005 .
[145] Dirk Ifenthaler,et al. Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problem-solving scenarios , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[146] A. M. White. The Process of Education , 1994 .
[147] B. Belland,et al. Scaffolding argumentation about water quality: a mixed-method study in a rural middle school , 2015, Educational Technology Research and Development.
[148] John Self,et al. The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely , 1998 .
[149] Bracha Kramarski,et al. Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[150] R. Pekrun,et al. Emotions and Motivation in Learning and Performance , 2014 .
[151] R. Pea,et al. The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[152] Wim Jochems,et al. A sampled literature review of design-based learning approaches: a search for key characteristics , 2013 .
[153] Anton E. Lawson,et al. Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery , 2009 .
[154] Jere Brophy,et al. Toward a model of the value aspects of motivation in education: Developing appreciation for.. , 1999 .
[155] S. Erduran,et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .
[156] Christian D. Schunn,et al. The Impact of an Engineering Design Curriculum on Science Reasoning in an Urban Setting , 2009 .
[157] H. Lee Swanson,et al. A Selective Synthesis of the Experimental Literature on Dynamic Assessment , 2001 .
[158] Joseph Krajcik,et al. The impact of designing and evaluating molecular animations on how well middle school students understand the particulate nature of matter , 2009 .
[159] Susan E. Newman,et al. Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .
[160] Daniel T. Hickey,et al. Enhancing Inquiry, Understanding, and Achievement in an Astronomy Multimedia Learning Environment , 2006 .
[161] Michael J. Ford,et al. A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation and Reasoning , 2012 .
[162] Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence , 2004 .
[163] Nicola Ariasi,et al. Epistemic metacognition in context: evaluating and learning online information , 2010 .
[164] John R. Savery,et al. Overview of Problem-Based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions. , 2006 .
[165] John R. Anderson. The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .
[166] Kevin Oliver,et al. Student Management of Web-Based Hypermedia Resources During Open-Ended Problem Solving , 2000 .
[167] Cher Ping Lim,et al. Scaffolding online historical inquiry tasks: A case study of two secondary school classrooms , 2008, Comput. Educ..
[168] Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al. Targeting Transfer in a STELLAR PBL Course for Pre-Service Teachers , 2009 .
[169] Joseph Krajcik,et al. A Framework for Supporting Metacognitive Aspects of Online Inquiry Through Software-Based Scaffolding , 2005 .
[170] H. Simon,et al. Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings , 1999 .
[171] Naomi J. Aldrich,et al. Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?. , 2011 .
[172] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.
[173] Margaret C. Lohman,et al. Designing groups in problem-based learning to promote problem-solving skill and self-directedness , 2000 .
[174] Susan M. Barnett,et al. Women's underrepresentation in science: sociocultural and biological considerations. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[175] John R. Anderson,et al. The generality/specificity of expertise in scientific reasoning , 1999, Cogn. Sci..
[176] Susan M. Barnett,et al. When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.
[177] Philip Bell,et al. Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education , 2008 .
[178] R. Azevedo. Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .
[179] David H. Jonassen,et al. The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .
[180] Joseph Krajcik,et al. An Investigation of Software Scaffolds Supporting Modeling Practices , 2002 .
[181] Xueli Zou,et al. Multiple representations of work-energy processes , 2001 .
[182] J. Osborne,et al. Teaching and Learning Science as Argument , 2010 .
[183] E. Davis. Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts , 2003 .
[184] Matthew Joordens,et al. Project-Oriented Design-Based Learning: Aligning Students' Views With Industry Needs* , 2013 .
[185] Christie P. Karpiak. Assessment of Problem-Based Learning in the Undergraduate Statistics Course , 2011 .
[186] Guy Cafri,et al. A Meta-Meta-Analysis: Empirical Review of Statistical Power, Type I Error Rates, Effect Sizes, and Model Selection of Meta-Analyses Published in Psychology , 2010, Multivariate behavioral research.
[187] M. Linn,et al. Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations , 2013 .
[188] Peggy A. Ertmer,et al. Validity and Problem-Based Learning Research: A Review of Instruments Used to Assess Intended Learning Outcomes , 2016 .
[189] Y. Hsu,et al. A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON SCAFFOLDING FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION , 2012 .
[190] Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al. Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .
[191] M. Hannafin,et al. A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition , 2013, Educational psychologist.
[192] L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al. Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .
[193] INTERSUBJECTIVITY THROUGH THE MASTERY OF SEMIOTIC MEANS IN TEACHER-STUDENT DISCOURSE , 2005 .
[194] Brenda Sugrue,et al. A Theory‐Based Framework for Assessing Domainl‐Specific Problem‐Solving Ability , 2005 .
[195] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Secondary Students' Dynamic Modeling Processes: Analyzing, Reasoning About, Synthesizing, and Testing Models of Stream Ecosystems , 1997 .
[196] John R. Anderson,et al. Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes , 2001, CHI.
[197] Ioannis Stamelos,et al. The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..
[198] Brian R. Belland,et al. USING GENERIC AND CONTEXT-SPECIFIC SCAFFOLDING TO SUPPORT AUTHENTIC SCIENCE INQUIRY , 2013 .
[199] Elizabeth A. Davis,et al. Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .
[200] Bruce W. Tuckman,et al. The effect of motivational scaffolding on procrastinators' distance learning outcomes , 2007, Comput. Educ..
[201] Maureen McLaughlin,et al. The Common Core: Insights Into the K–5 Standards , 2012 .
[202] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre. Determinism and Underdetermination in Genetics: Implications for Students’ Engagement in Argumentation and Epistemic Practices , 2014 .
[203] Heather Leary,et al. A Problem Based Learning Meta Analysis: Differences across Problem Types, Implementation Types, Disciplines, and Assessment Levels. , 2009 .
[204] Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al. The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[205] W. Schmidt,et al. Curriculum coherence: an examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective , 2005 .
[206] E. Deci,et al. Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. , 2010 .
[207] Hee-Sun Lee,et al. Making authentic science accessible to students , 2003 .
[208] W. V. van Joolingen,et al. The Difficult Process of Scientific Modelling: An analysis of novices' reasoning during computer‐based modelling , 2005 .
[209] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. The Use of Criteria in Argumentation and the Construction of Environmental Concepts: A university case study , 2010 .
[210] L. Berkson. Problem‐based learning: have the expectations been met? , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[211] Philip C. Abrami,et al. What Forty Years of Research Says About the Impact of Technology on Learning , 2011 .
[212] Lih-Shyang Chen,et al. Building a General Purpose Pedagogical Agent in a Web-Based Multimedia Clinical Simulation System for Medical Education , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[213] Markus Dresel,et al. A Computer-Based Approach to Fostering Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning , 2008 .
[214] T. Bondas,et al. Challenges in Approaching Metasynthesis Research , 2007, Qualitative health research.
[215] David H. Jonassen,et al. Learning to Solve Problems : A Handbook for Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments , 2010 .
[216] M. Anne Britt,et al. Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information , 2014 .
[217] C. Hmelo‐Silver,et al. Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) , 2007 .
[218] Linda S. Behar-Horenstein,et al. Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis , 2013 .
[219] Gerald F. Smith. Are There Domain–Specific Thinking Skills? , 2002 .
[220] D. Walton. Dialogue theory for critical thinking , 1989 .
[221] David H. Jonassen,et al. Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .
[222] J. Sweller,et al. Domain-Specific Knowledge and Why Teaching Generic Skills Does Not Work , 2014 .
[223] Richard Lesh,et al. Problem Solving, Modeling, and Local Conceptual Development , 2003 .
[224] Brian R. Belland,et al. A Pilot Meta-Analysis of Computer-Based Scaffolding in STEM Education , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..
[225] Robert E. Slavin,et al. How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis , 2012 .
[226] Justin P. Chase,et al. Beyond Performance: A Motivational Experiences Model of Stereotype Threat , 2013, Educational Psychology Review.
[227] C. Chinn,et al. Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .
[228] Benjamin S. Bloom,et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .
[229] William A. Sandoval,et al. Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .
[230] Erin Marie Furtak,et al. Making students' thinking explicit in writing and discussion: An analysis of formative assessment prompts , 2008 .
[231] R. Duschl. Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .
[232] Rafa M. Kasim,et al. What Can Studies of Problem-Based Learning Tell Us? Synthesizing and Modeling PBL Effects on National Board of Medical Examination Performance: Hierarchical Linear Modeling Meta-Analytic Approach , 1999, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.
[233] K. Howells. The future of education and skills: education 2030: the future we want , 2018 .
[234] Annelies Raes,et al. Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[235] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards , 2014 .
[236] Fabio N. Akhras,et al. Beyond intelligent tutoring systems: Situations, interactions, processes and affordances , 2002 .
[237] Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al. Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[238] Michael Pressley,et al. Scaffolding scientific competencies within classroom communities of inquiry. , 1997 .
[239] J. Coryell. Collaborative, Comparative Inquiry and Transformative Cross-Cultural Adult Learning and Teaching , 2013 .
[240] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .
[241] F. H. van Eemeren,et al. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation , 2002 .
[242] Douglas B. Clark,et al. WISE design for knowledge integration , 2003 .
[243] Carolyn W. Keys,et al. Co-Constructing Inquiry-based Science with Teachers: Essential Research for Lasting Reform. , 2001 .
[244] Robert L. Williams. Targeting critical thinking within teacher education: The potential impact on society , 2004 .
[245] R. Azevedo,et al. Modeling Epistemic and Ontological Cognition: Philosophical Perspectives and Methodological Directions , 2008 .
[246] Katherine Richardson,et al. Referencing Science: Teaching Undergraduates to Identify, Validate, and Utilize Peer-Reviewed Online Literature , 2008 .
[247] Ton de Jong,et al. Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .
[248] B. Belland. Scaffolding: Definition, Current Debates, and Future Directions , 2014 .
[249] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Bilingual language supports in online science inquiry environments , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[250] Frazier T. Stevenson,et al. Comparing Problem-Based Learning with Case-Based Learning: Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[251] Dana L. Grisham,et al. Scaffolding English Language Learners and Struggling Readers in a Universal Literacy Environment with Embedded Strategy Instruction and Vocabulary Support , 2007 .
[252] C. Coogler,et al. Foundations of Behavioral Research 2nd ed , 1974 .
[253] Charles M. Reigeluth,et al. Technology functions for personalized learning in learner-centered schools , 2018, Educational Technology Research and Development.
[254] Johannes Strobel,et al. Engineering in the K‐12 STEM Standards of the 50 U.S. States: An Analysis of Presence and Extent , 2012 .
[255] Samuel Greiff,et al. Inductive reasoning, domain specific and complex problem solving: Relations and development , 2013 .
[256] S. D. Kolstø. Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues , 2001 .
[257] Donna M. Desrochers,et al. Preparing Students for the Knowledge Economy: What School Counselors Need To Know. , 2003 .
[258] Daniel L. Schwartz,et al. Young Children Can Learn Scientific Reasoning with Teachable Agents , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.
[259] Alan C. K. Cheung,et al. The Effectiveness of Educational Technology Applications for Enhancing Mathematics Achievement in K-12 Classrooms: A Meta-Analysis. Best Evidence Encyclopedia (BEE). , 2011 .
[260] Anne Kuefer,et al. Explaining Science A Cognitive Approach , 2016 .
[261] Helen L. Gibson,et al. Longitudinal impact of an inquiry‐based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science , 2002 .
[262] M. Albanese,et al. Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[263] S. Puntambekar,et al. Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .
[264] Krista Glazewski,et al. Problem-based learning and argumentation: testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students’ creation of evidence-based arguments , 2011 .
[265] Roy D. Pea,et al. Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design , 1999 .
[266] Vincent Aleven,et al. An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor , 2002, Cogn. Sci..
[267] D. Jonassen,et al. Arguing to learn and learning to argue: design justifications and guidelines , 2010 .
[268] V. Aleven,et al. Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .
[269] Chris Quintana,et al. Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students' online inquiry processes , 2012, Comput. Educ..
[270] Katherine L. McNeill,et al. Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy , 2008 .
[271] Nancy J. Nersessian,et al. Creating Scientific Concepts , 2008 .
[272] Mesut Duran,et al. Urban High School Students’ IT/STEM Learning: Findings from a Collaborative Inquiry- and Design-Based Afterschool Program , 2013, Journal of Science Education and Technology.
[273] Peter Houtlosser,et al. Managing Disagreement: Rhetorical Analysis Within a Dialectical Framework , 2001 .
[274] D. Perkins,et al. Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .
[275] Brian R. Bryant,et al. A Review of Research on Universal Design Educational Models , 2014 .
[276] Kathleen C. Perencevich,et al. Supporting Autonomy in the Classroom: Ways Teachers Encourage Student Decision Making and Ownership , 2004 .
[277] Sofie M. M. Loyens,et al. Investigating effects of problem-based versus lecture-based learning environments on student motivat , 2011 .
[278] Manuel Santos-Trigo,et al. Mathematical Problem Solving , 2015 .
[279] A. Bandura. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.
[280] Krista Glazewski,et al. Scaffolding Disciplined Inquiry in Problem-Based Learning Environments , 2006 .
[281] Michael J. Hannafin,et al. Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: a qualitative case study , 2011 .
[282] Johannes Strobel,et al. When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms , 2009 .
[283] B. Belland,et al. A Blended Professional Development Program to Help a Teacher Learn to Provide One-to-One Scaffolding , 2015 .