Level of Robot Autonomy and Information Aids in Human-Robot Interaction Affect Human Mental Workload - An Investigation in Virtual Reality

In future work systems, humans may interact with scalable industrial robots. In a virtual reality simulation study, human mental workload effects were analyzed in human-robot interactions (HRI) with variations in design requirements regarding human factors and ergonomics (HFE) as well as occupational safety and health (OSH). Each of 20 participants performed his/her own task while interacting with two virtual robots in a manufacturing environment. Results on task performance indicated relative lower human mental workload when robots acted on lower level of robot autonomy (lower LORA) and the human operator was informed about upcoming HRI by multi-modal signaling (Information Aid ‘on’). However, this pattern of workload reflected in performance measures, was not reflected in mental workload ratings. Hence, compensational adjustments in operator performance were assumed. It was concluded, that a combination of less autonomous robots and multi-modal feedback result in relatively less operator distraction from task performance and, thus, less impairment in operator workload. HFE and OSH may improve when HRI is audio-visually indicated and robot activities are adapted to human operator task requirements (low LORA). Therefore, results have the potential to inform future design of HRI regarding HFE and OSH at different workplaces in industry and services.

[1]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Effects of Robot Sound on Auditory Localization in Human-Robot Collaboration , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  G. R. J. Hockey Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[3]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Human-System Interaction Design Requirements to Improve Machinery and Systems Safety , 2019 .

[4]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[5]  Friedhelm Nachreiner,et al.  Human factors in process control systems: The design of human–machine interfaces ☆ , 2006 .

[6]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  A scalable approach to human-robot interaction , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[7]  Jörg Beringer,et al.  ERTS: A flexible software tool for developing and running psychological reaction time experiments on IBM PCs , 1994 .

[8]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Reconstruction of Near Misses and Accidents for Analyses from Virtual Reality Usability Study , 2017, EuroVR.

[9]  Eberhard Ulich,et al.  Concepts and procedures of work psychology for the analysis, evaluation and design of advanced manufacturing systems: A case study , 1990 .

[10]  Robert S. Kennedy,et al.  Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. , 1993 .

[11]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction: A Survey , 2008, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Toward a framework for levels of robot autonomy in human-robot interaction , 2014, Journal of human-robot interaction.

[13]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Improvements of Machinery and Systems Safety by Human Factors, Ergonomics and Safety in Human-System Interaction , 2018 .

[14]  Michael D. Coovert,et al.  Autonomy and Automation Reliability in Human-Robot Interaction: A Qualitative Review , 2009 .

[15]  Björn Matthias,et al.  Safety of Industrial Robots: From Conventional to Collaborative Applications , 2012, ROBOTIK.

[16]  Aude Billard,et al.  Safety issues in human-robot interactions , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[18]  Julie M. Drexler,et al.  Cybersickness is Not Simulator Sickness , 1997 .

[19]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Sensitivity and Diagnosticity of the 0.1-Hz Component of Heart Rate Variability as an Indicator of Mental Workload , 2003, Hum. Factors.

[20]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Improving Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) in Human-System Interaction (HSI) Through Applications in Virtual Environments , 2018, HCI.

[21]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human Factors in Engineering and Design , 1957 .

[22]  Bartholomäus Wissmath,et al.  Measuring presence with verbal versus pictorial scales: a comparison between online- and ex post-ratings , 2010, Virtual Reality.

[23]  Peter Nickel,et al.  Effects of movement speed and predictability in human–robot collaboration , 2017 .

[24]  Frank Hearl,et al.  Working safely with robot workers: Recommendations for the new workplace , 2016, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.