Perception of dynamic Glass patterns

In the mammalian brain, form and motion are processed through two distinct pathways at early stages of visual processing. However, recent evidence suggests that these two pathways may interact. Here we used dynamic Glass patterns, which have been previously shown to create the perception of coherent motion in humans, despite containing no motion coherence. Glass patterns are static stimuli that consist of randomly positioned dot pairs that are integrated spatially to create the perception of a global form, whereas dynamic Glass patterns consist of several independently generated static Glass patterns presented sequentially. In the current study, we measured the detection threshold of five types of dynamic Glass patterns and compared the rank order of the detection thresholds with those found for static Glass patterns and real motion patterns (using random dot stimuli). With both the static Glass patterns and dynamic Glass patterns, detection thresholds were lowest for concentric and radial patterns and highest for horizontal patterns. We also found that vertical patterns were better detected than horizontal patterns, consistent with prior evidence of a "horizontal effect" in the perception of natural scene images. With real motion, detection thresholds were equivalent across all patterns, with the exception of higher thresholds for spiral patterns. Our results suggest that dynamic Glass patterns are processed primarily as form prior to input into the motion system.

[1]  Alan L. F. Lee,et al.  A comparison of global motion perception using a multiple-aperture stimulus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[2]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Detection and discrimination of optical flow components , 1998 .

[4]  R. M. Siegel,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man , 1988, Nature.

[5]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Flexibility in intercepting moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[6]  D. Burr,et al.  Cardinal directions for visual optic flow , 1999, Current Biology.

[7]  Frank Bremmer,et al.  Neural correlates of implied motion , 2003, Nature.

[8]  J. Gallant,et al.  A Human Extrastriate Area Functionally Homologous to Macaque V4 , 2000, Neuron.

[9]  Stephen J Anderson,et al.  Neuroimaging in Human Amblyopia , 2006, Strabismus.

[10]  Stephen J. Anderson,et al.  MEG Responses to the Perception of Global Structure within Glass Patterns , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Gunter Loffler,et al.  An inverse oblique effect in human vision , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  H. Wilson,et al.  Detection of global structure in Glass patterns: implications for form vision , 1998, Vision Research.

[14]  Francesca Pei,et al.  Event-related potentials show configural specificity of global form processing , 2005, Neuroreport.

[15]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Linking form and motion in the primate brain , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[17]  J. Movshon,et al.  Glass pattern responses in macaque V2 neurons. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[18]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Edward A Essock,et al.  A horizontal bias in human visual processing of orientation and its correspondence to the structural components of natural scenes. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[20]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[21]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Intact “biological motion” and “structure from motion” perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[22]  Oliver Braddick,et al.  Interaction of spatial and temporal integration in global form processing , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  Vincent P Ferrera,et al.  Detection thresholds for spiral Glass patterns , 2001, Vision Research.

[24]  R. Henson Neuroimaging studies of priming , 2003, Progress in Neurobiology.

[25]  Janette Atkinson,et al.  Differential human brain activation by vertical and horizontal global visual textures , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[27]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Signals in Macaque Striate Cortical Neurons that Support the Perception of Glass Patterns , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  J A Beintema,et al.  Perception of biological motion without local image motion , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[30]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Structure from motion , 2008 .

[31]  O. Braddick,et al.  What is Noise for the Motion System? , 1996, Vision Research.

[32]  I. Biederman,et al.  Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  Sieu K. Khuu,et al.  The role of luminance contrast in the detection of global structure in static and dynamic, same- and opposite-polarity, Glass patterns , 2007, Vision Research.

[34]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[35]  P. McLeod,et al.  Preserved and Impaired Detection of Structure From Motion by a 'Motion-blind" Patient , 1996 .

[36]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[37]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Implied motion from form in the human visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[39]  D. Burr,et al.  The effects of opposite-polarity dipoles on the detection of Glass patterns , 2006, Vision Research.

[40]  N. Mai,et al.  Selective disturbance of movement vision after bilateral brain damage. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  S. C Dakin,et al.  Summation of concentric orientation structure: seeing the Glass or the window? , 2002, Vision Research.

[42]  R. Turner,et al.  Form and motion coherence activate independent, but not dorsal/ventral segregated, networks in the human brain , 2000, Current Biology.

[43]  W F Bischof,et al.  Detection of Glass Patterns by Pigeons and Humans: Implications for Differences in Higher-Level Processing , 2001, Psychological science.

[44]  Z. Kourtzi,et al.  Neural coding of global form in the human visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[46]  L. Glass Moiré Effect from Random Dots , 1969, Nature.

[47]  Alex Martin,et al.  Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[48]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals , 2000, Current Biology.

[49]  Edward A. Essock,et al.  Oblique stimuli are seen best (not worst!) in naturalistic broad-band stimuli: a horizontal effect , 2003, Vision Research.