The role of awareness and working memory in human transitive inference

The human ability to perform transitive inference (TI) is an area of debate from a neurocognitive standpoint. Some studies emphasize a stimulus driven medial-temporal lobe process [Preston, A.R., Shrager, Y., Dudukovic, N.M., Gabrieli, J.D., 2004. Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory. Hippocampus 14, 148-152; Titone, D., Ditman, T., Holzman, P., Eichenbaum, H., Levy, D., 2004. A transitive inference test of relational memory in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 68, 235-247; Van Elzakker, M., O'Reilley, R., Rudy, J., 2003. Transivity, flexibility, conjenctive representation and the hippocampus: an empirical analysis. Hippocampus 13, 334-340] while others emphasize a higher-level frontal lobe strategy that requires the flexible maintenance of information in working memory [Waltz, J., Knowlton, B., Holyoak, K., Boone, K., Mishkin, F., de Menedezes Santos, M., Thomas, C., Miller, B., 1999. A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychol. Sci. 10, 119-125]. In two experiments we investigated when and how adults employ different cognitive strategies during TI by evaluating the interaction between task instructions and individual differences in working memory capacity. Participants engaged in a paired discrimination task involving a 6-unit TI hierarchy and were either prior aware, prior unaware or serendipitously aware of the hierarchical relationship among stimulus items. Both prior aware participants and serendipitously aware participants were more likely to engage in a logic-based strategy compared to unaware participants who relied upon stimulus-driven strategies. Individual differences in working memory were associated with the acquisition of awareness in the serendipitously aware group and with the maintenance of awareness in the prior aware group. These findings suggest that the capacity for TI may be supported by multiple neurocognitive strategies, and that the specific strategy employed is dependent upon both task- and participant-related factors.

[1]  J. Ehrlinger,et al.  Transitive Behavior in Hippocampal-Lesioned Pigeons , 2004, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[2]  D. Levy,et al.  Transitive inference in schizophrenia: impairments in relational memory organization , 2004, Schizophrenia Research.

[3]  B Macwhinney,et al.  The PsyScope experiment-building system. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Transitive Inference in Rats: A Test of the Spatial Coding Hypothesis , 1994 .

[5]  G. Thines,et al.  Behavioural processes , 1976, Behavioural Processes.

[6]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  Working memory capacity - facets of a cognitive ability construct , 2000 .

[7]  S. Heckers,et al.  Hippocampal activation during transitive inference in humans , 2004, Hippocampus.

[8]  J. Staddon,et al.  Pigeons' inferences are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles: A response. , 1992 .

[9]  C. D. L. Wynne,et al.  Pigeon transitive inference: Tests of simple accounts of a complex performance , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  Michael Van Elzakker,et al.  Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis , 2003, Hippocampus.

[11]  Gabriel Radvansky,et al.  Working memory and syllogistic reasoning , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  L. Day.  The Importance of Hippocampus-Dependent Non-Spatial Tasks in Analyses of Homology and Homoplasy , 2003, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[13]  William L. Gross,et al.  An fMRI Analysis of the Human Hippocampus: Inference, Context, and Task Awareness , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  K. Holyoak,et al.  A System for Relational Reasoning in Human Prefrontal Cortex , 1999 .

[15]  Lila Davachi,et al.  The ensemble that plays together, stays together , 2004, Hippocampus.

[16]  P. Rapp.  Who's the fairest of them all? Role of the human hippocampus in the relational organization of memory , 2004, Hippocampus.

[17]  Larry R Squire,et al.  Declarative Memory, Awareness, and Transitive Inference , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms of transitive inference , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Learning and memory for hierarchical relationships in the monkey: effects of aging. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  D. Wechsler.  Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale , 2021, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[21]  Alison R Preston,et al.  Hippocampal contribution to the novel use of relational information in declarative memory , 2004, Hippocampus.

[22]  B. Alsop,et al.  Transitive inference and awareness in humans , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[23]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The hippocampus and memory for orderly stimulus relations. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. Piaget.  The Language and Thought of the Child , 1927 .

[25]  Randall W Engle,et al.  Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Wouter Duyck,et al.  Conditional reasoning with a spatial content requires visuo-spatial working memory , 2003 .

[27]  P. Ackerman,et al.  Working Memory and Intelligence : The Same or Different Constructs ? , 2005 .

[28]  M. Siemann,et al.  Influences of task concreteness upon transitive responding in humans , 1996, Psychological research.

[29]  David Wood,et al.  Luddites must not block progress in genetics , 1999, Nature.

[30]  J. Nagode,et al.  Human hippocampal activation during transitive inference , 2002, Neuroreport.

[31]  William B Levy,et al.  Relational learning with and without awareness: Transitive inference using nonverbal stimuli in humans , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[32]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Frontal and parietal lobe activation during transitive inference in humans. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[33]  D. Amaral,et al.  Entorhinal Cortex Lesions Disrupt the Relational Organization of Memory in Monkeys , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[35]  William B. Levy,et al.  When logic fails: Implicit transitive inference in humans , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[36]  C. Wynne.  Reinforcement accounts for transitive inference performance , 1995 .

[37]  M. Colombo,et al.  The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1990 .

[38]  R. O’Reilly,et al.  Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: principles of cortical and hippocampal function. , 2001, Psychological review.

[39]  S. Moses,et al.  An investigation of learning strategy supporting transitive inference performance in humans compared to other species , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill , 1990 .

[41]  J. Hamilton,et al.  The Symbolic Distance Effect for Alphabetic Order Judgements: A Subjective Report and Reaction Time Analysis , 1978 .

[42]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity , 1999, Nature.

[43]  R. Engle,et al.  The role of working memory capacity in retrieval. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  D. Gillan.  Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. , 1981 .