The Cell Cycle Switch Computes Approximate Majority

Both computational and biological systems have to make decisions about switching from one state to another. The ‘Approximate Majority’ computational algorithm provides the asymptotically fastest way to reach a common decision by all members of a population between two possible outcomes, where the decision approximately matches the initial relative majority. The network that regulates the mitotic entry of the cell-cycle in eukaryotes also makes a decision before it induces early mitotic processes. Here we show that the switch from inactive to active forms of the mitosis promoting Cyclin Dependent Kinases is driven by a system that is related to both the structure and the dynamics of the Approximate Majority computation. We investigate the behavior of these two switches by deterministic, stochastic and probabilistic methods and show that the steady states and temporal dynamics of the two systems are similar and they are exchangeable as components of oscillatory networks.

[1]  Attila Csikász-Nagy,et al.  Computational systems biology of the cell cycle , 2009, Briefings Bioinform..

[2]  Jean DerGurahian Does it compute? , 2009, Modern healthcare.

[3]  John J Tyson,et al.  Functional motifs in biochemical reaction networks. , 2010, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[4]  Maria Rosa Domingo-Sananes,et al.  Different effects of redundant feedback loops on a bistable switch. , 2010, Chaos.

[5]  R. Steuer Effects of stochasticity in models of the cell cycle: from quantized cycle times to noise-induced oscillations. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Temporal Organization of the Cell Cycle , 2008, Current Biology.

[7]  Albert Goldbeter Zero-order switches and developmental thresholds , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[8]  Luca Cardelli,et al.  Efficient, Correct Simulation of Biological Processes in the Stochastic Pi-calculus , 2007, CMSB.

[9]  R. Thomas,et al.  Multistationarity, the basis of cell differentiation and memory. I. Structural conditions of multistationarity and other nontrivial behavior. , 2001, Chaos.

[10]  Rong Li,et al.  Yeast and fungal morphogenesis from an evolutionary perspective. , 2008, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[11]  David M. Glover,et al.  The overlooked greatwall: a new perspective on mitotic control , 2012, Open Biology.

[12]  V. Fülöp,et al.  The anatomy of a bifunctional enzyme: Structural basis for reduction of oxygen to water and synthesis of nitric oxide by cytochrome cd1 , 1995, Cell.

[13]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S3 Table S1 References Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2022 .

[14]  R J Fletterick,et al.  Evolution of a bifunctional enzyme: 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Peter G. Harrison,et al.  Computer Performance Evaluation: Modelling Techniques and Tools , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Ajay D. Kshemkalyani,et al.  Distributed Computing: Index , 2008 .

[17]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Distributivity and processivity in multisite phosphorylation can be distinguished through steady-state invariants. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Luca Cardelli,et al.  Transcriptional Regulation Is a Major Controller of Cell Cycle Transition Dynamics , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  T. Henzinger,et al.  Executable cell biology , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  J. Tyson,et al.  Design principles of biochemical oscillators , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  J. Griffith Mathematics of cellular control processes. II. Positive feedback to one gene. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Modeling Networks of Coupled Enzymatic Reactions Using the Total Quasi-Steady State Approximation , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  J. Tyson,et al.  The dynamics of cell cycle regulation. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[24]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[25]  A. Beth,et al.  6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2,6-bisphosphatase from rat liver. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Building a cell cycle oscillator: hysteresis and bistability in the activation of Cdc2 , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  Marta Z. Kwiatkowska,et al.  PRISM: Probabilistic Symbolic Model Checker , 2002, Computer Performance Evaluation / TOOLS.

[28]  Andreas Deutsch,et al.  Membrane identity and GTPase cascades regulated by toggle and cut-out switches , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[29]  Paul Nurse,et al.  Life, logic and information , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Ajay D. Kshemkalyani,et al.  Distributed Computing: Principles, Algorithms, and Systems , 2008 .

[31]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Effects of sequestration on signal transduction cascades , 2006, The FEBS journal.

[32]  James Aspnes,et al.  An Introduction to Population Protocols , 2007, Bull. EATCS.

[33]  Z. Bar-Joseph,et al.  Algorithms in nature: the convergence of systems biology and computational thinking , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[34]  E. Shapiro,et al.  Cellular abstractions: Cells as computation , 2002, Nature.

[35]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[36]  Peter Novick,et al.  Rabs and their effectors: Achieving specificity in membrane traffic , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  John J Tyson,et al.  A model of yeast cell-cycle regulation based on multisite phosphorylation , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[38]  Corrado Priami,et al.  Algorithmic systems biology , 2009, CACM.

[39]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Polarization and Movement of Keratocytes: A Multiscale Modelling Approach , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[40]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[41]  Attila Csikász-Nagy,et al.  Analysis of a generic model of eukaryotic cell-cycle regulation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[42]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Interlinked Fast and Slow Positive Feedback Loops Drive Reliable Cell Decisions , 2005, Science.

[43]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  Mathematical Modeling Identifies Inhibitors of Apoptosis as Mediators of Positive Feedback and Bistability , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Katherine C. Chen,et al.  Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[45]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems - a guide to XPPAUT for researchers and students , 2002, Software, environments, tools.

[46]  Tim Hunt,et al.  Protein phosphatases and their regulation in the control of mitosis , 2012, EMBO reports.

[47]  John J. Tyson,et al.  Irreversible cell-cycle transitions are due to systems-level feedback , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[48]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Feedback regulation of opposing enzymes generates robust, all-or-none bistable responses , 2008, Current Biology.

[49]  R. Medema,et al.  The decision to enter mitosis: feedback and redundancy in the mitotic entry network , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[50]  Chris Sangwin,et al.  The wonky trammel of Archimedes , 2008 .

[51]  Keith Devlin,et al.  Logic and information , 1991 .

[52]  J. Tyson,et al.  Numerical analysis of a comprehensive model of M-phase control in Xenopus oocyte extracts and intact embryos. , 1993, Journal of cell science.

[53]  H. Bisswanger,et al.  Multifunctional proteins. , 1976, Annual review of biochemistry.

[54]  E. F. ARMSTRONG,et al.  Annual Review of Biochemistry , 1944, Nature.

[55]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  Triggering the all-or-nothing switch into mitosis. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[56]  Seif Haridi,et al.  Distributed Algorithms , 1992, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[57]  D. Koshland,et al.  An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  T. Höfer,et al.  Multisite protein phosphorylation – from molecular mechanisms to kinetic models , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[59]  Nils Blüthgen,et al.  How robust are switches in intracellular signaling cascades? , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[60]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[61]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[62]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  David Eisenstat,et al.  A simple population protocol for fast robust approximate majority , 2007, Distributed Computing.

[64]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[65]  P. Nurse Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase , 1990, Nature.

[66]  M. Kwiatkowska,et al.  Biological pathways as communicating computer systems , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[67]  Tony Pawson,et al.  Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication , 2001, Nature.

[68]  J. Ferrell,et al.  Modeling the Cell Cycle: Why Do Certain Circuits Oscillate? , 2011, Cell.

[69]  J. Griffith,et al.  Mathematics of cellular control processes. I. Negative feedback to one gene. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[70]  A. Ninfa,et al.  Building biological memory by linking positive feedback loops , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.