Heterogeneous resource allocation can change social hierarchy in public goods games

Public goods games (PGGs) represent one of the most useful tools to study group interactions. However, even if they could provide an explanation for the emergence and stability of cooperation in modern societies, they are not able to reproduce some key features observed in social and economical interactions. The typical shape of wealth distribution—known as Pareto Law—and the microscopic organization of wealth production are two of them. Here, we introduce a modification to the classical formulation of PGGs that allows for the emergence of both of these features from first principles. Unlike traditional PGGs, where players contribute equally to all the games in which they participate, we allow individuals to redistribute their contribution according to what they earned in previous rounds. Results from numerical simulations show that not only a Pareto distribution for the pay-offs naturally emerges but also that if players do not invest enough in one round they can act as defectors even if they are formally cooperators. Our results not only give an explanation for wealth heterogeneity observed in real data but also point to a conceptual change on cooperation in collective dilemmas.

[1]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[2]  T. Killingback,et al.  Evolution in group-structured populations can resolve the tragedy of the commons , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  The theory of evolution and dynamical systems , 1988 .

[4]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Escaping the tragedy of the commons via directed investments. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game , 2010, 1007.0431.

[6]  B. Wang,et al.  Role of aspiration-induced migration in cooperation. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[7]  Zhihai Rong,et al.  Effects of aspiration on public cooperation in structured populations , 2012 .

[8]  Long Wang,et al.  Evolution of Cooperation Driven by Reputation-Based Migration , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  J. Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Robustness of cooperation in the evolutionary prisoner's dilemma on complex networks , 2007, q-bio/0703019.

[10]  ปิยดา สมบัติวัฒนา.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2013 .

[11]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[12]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[14]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Resource heterogeneity can facilitate cooperation , 2013, Nature Communications.

[15]  Zhihai Rong,et al.  The evolutionary public goods game on scale-free networks with heterogeneous investment , 2010 .

[16]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[17]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[18]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary game dynamics , 2011 .

[19]  Matjaž Perc,et al.  Sustainable institutionalized punishment requires elimination of second-order free-riders , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Guanrong Chen,et al.  Promotion of cooperation induced by nonuniform payoff allocation in spatial public goods game , 2010 .

[21]  A. Sanchez,et al.  Co-evolution of strategies and update rules in the prisoner's dilemma game on complex networks , 2010, 1007.3626.

[22]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Human behavior in Prisoner's Dilemma experiments suppresses network reciprocity , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[23]  Shilpa Chakravartula,et al.  Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics , 2014 .

[24]  Bing-Hong Wang,et al.  Evolutionary public goods games on scale-free networks with unequal payoff allocation mechanism , 2010 .

[25]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[26]  H. Gintis,et al.  Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical , 2007 .

[27]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  The Calculus of Selfishness , 2011 .

[28]  C. Nunn,et al.  Economics in Nature: Cooperation and collective action in animal behaviour , 2001 .

[29]  D. Helbing,et al.  The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary Establishment of Moral and Double Moral Standards through Spatial Interactions , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  M. Archetti,et al.  Review: Game theory of public goods in one-shot social dilemmas without assortment. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[32]  Wen-Xu Wang,et al.  Role of adaptive migration in promoting cooperation in spatial games. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[33]  Long Wang,et al.  Diversity of contribution promotes cooperation in public goods games , 2010 .

[34]  J. Cuesta,et al.  Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s Dilemma , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction - Second Edition , 2009 .

[36]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENT KNOWLEDGE ON AGGLOMERATION AND COOPERATION IN SPATIAL PUBLIC GOODS GAMES , 2012 .

[37]  Ángel Sánchez,et al.  Evolutionary game theory: Temporal and spatial effects beyond replicator dynamics , 2009, Physics of life reviews.

[38]  E. Fehr.  Human behaviour: Don't lose your reputation , 2004, Nature.

[39]  M. Nowak.  Evolutionary Dynamics: Exploring the Equations of Life , 2006 .

[40]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary prisoner's dilemma game on Newman-Watts networks. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[42]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[43]  Karl Sigmund,et al.  Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  R. Boyd,et al.  Explaining altruistic behavior in humans , 2003 .

[45]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Dynamical organization of cooperation in complex topologies. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[46]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[47]  J Gómez-Gardeñes,et al.  Intergroup information exchange drives cooperation in the public goods game. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[48]  H. Fawcett.  Manual of Political Economy , 1995 .

[49]  Bing-Hong Wang,et al.  Group diversity promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010 .

[50]  Daniele Vilone,et al.  Disentangling social and group heterogeneities: Public Goods games on complex networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[51]  Heinz Georg Schuster,et al.  Reviews of nonlinear dynamics and complexity , 2008 .

[52]  References , 1971 .

[53]  Bing-Hong Wang,et al.  Dynamic allocation of investments promotes cooperation in spatial public goods game , 2012 .

[54]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[55]  Arne Traulsen,et al.  Stochastic evolutionary game dynamics , 2008, 0811.3538.

[56]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Does strong heterogeneity promote cooperation by group interactions? , 2011, ArXiv.

[57]  Long Wang,et al.  Heterogeneity of allocation promotes cooperation in public goods games , 2010 .

[58]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[59]  Yamir Moreno,et al.  Velocity-enhanced cooperation of moving agents playing public goods games. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[60]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[61]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Emergence of social cohesion in a model society of greedy, mobile individuals , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  R. Pastor-Satorras,et al.  Generation of uncorrelated random scale-free networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[63]  David G. Rand,et al.  Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation , 2009, Science.