Were bamboo tools made in prehistoric Southeast Asia? An experimental view from South China

The use of bamboo by hominins in Southeast Asia has long been used as an explanation for the lack of stone tool innovation and diversity in that region during the Pleistocene. The paleoenvironmental and ethnographic basis of “Bamboo hypothesis” has been critiqued recently, but those factors are not directly relevant to the question of whether prehistoric hominins actually used bamboo. There is an even more rudimentary question that should be answered first: is it even possible to make complex bamboo tools with simple flaked cobble tool industries? This paper shows that it is indeed possible to procure and manipulate bamboo in a variety of ways with replicated stone tools. Not all bamboo stems are of equal quality, which should add a layer of intricacy in need of consideration by any future advocate of the Bamboo Hypothesis. Pilot knapping studies are also discussed, and suggest that the raw material constraints presented by local raw materials may generally be given undue weight in the morphological appearance of Southeast Asian Pleistocene stone tools.

[1]  Hitoshi Watanabe.  The chopper-chopping tool complex of eastern asia: An ethnoarchaeological-ecological reexamination , 1985 .

[2]  August G. Costa,et al.  A Geometric Morphometric Assessment of Plan Shape in Bone and Stone Acheulean Bifaces from the Middle Pleistocene Site of Castel di Guido, Latium, Italy , 2010 .

[3]  R. Dennell.  Dispersal and colonisation, long and short chronologies: how continuous is the Early Pleistocene record for hominids outside East Africa? , 2003, Journal of human evolution.

[4]  N. Goren-Inbar,et al.  An Acheulian Biface Assemblage from Gesher Benot Ya'aqov, Israel: Indications of African Affinities , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  A demographic model for Palaeolithic technological evolution: The case of East Asia and the Movius Line , 2010 .

[6]  G. Pope.  Recent Advances in Far Eastern Paleoanthropology , 1988 .

[7]  R. Milo,et al.  Tools, language and cognition in human evolution , 1995, International Journal of Primatology.

[8]  A. Chamberlain.  Demography in Archaeology , 2006 .

[9]  H. Thieme.  Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany , 1997, Nature.

[10]  B. Marwick.  What attributes are important for the measurement of assemblage reduction intensity? Results from an experimental stone artefact assemblage with relevance to the Hoabinhian of mainland Southeast Asia , 2008 .

[11]  S. Suomi,et al.  The manufacture and use of bamboo tools by monkeys: Possible implications for the development of material culture among east asian hominids , 1995 .

[12]  S. Lycett.  Why is there a lack of Mode 3 Levallois technologies in East Asia? A phylogenetic test of the Movius-Schick hypothesis , 2007 .

[13]  Hallam L. Movius join.  The Lower Palaeolithic Cultures of Southern and Eastern Asia , 1948 .

[14]  R. Amundson,et al.  Determining Stone Tool Use: Chemical and Morphological Analyses of Residues on Experimentally Manufactured Stone Tools , 1997 .

[15]  C. J. Norton,et al.  A critique of the Chinese ‘Middle Palaeolithic’ , 2002, Antiquity.

[16]  J. Henrich.  Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses—The Tasmanian Case , 2004, American Antiquity.

[17]  R. Dennell.  The paleolithic settlement of Asia , 2008 .

[18]  D. Ohrnberger,et al.  The bamboos of the world , 1999 .

[19]  S. Lycett,et al.  New perspectives on old stones : analytical approaches to Paleolithic technologies , 2010 .

[20]  C. J. Norton,et al.  Middle Pleistocene handaxes from the Korean Peninsula. , 2006, Journal of human evolution.

[21]  M. Petraglia.  The Indian Acheulean in global perspective , 2006 .

[22]  Stephen J. Lycett,et al.  The Movius Line controversy: the state of the debate , 2010 .

[23]  Adam Brumm.  The Movius Line and the Bamboo Hypothesis: Early Hominin Stone Technology in Southeast Asia , 2010 .

[24]  R. Corruccini,et al.  Integrative Paths to the Past: Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell , 1994 .

[25]  Julien Louys,et al.  Differentiating bamboo from stone tool cut marks in the zooarchaeological record, with a discussion on the use of bamboo knives , 2007 .

[26]  P. Brantingham,et al.  The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe , 2004 .

[27]  Y. Yashuda.  The Origins of Pottery and Agriculture , 2005 .

[28]  Kexin Liu,et al.  Radiocarbon dating of charcoal and bone collagen associated with early pottery at Yuchanyan Cave, Hunan Province, China , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  P. Chauhan.  The Lower Paleolithic of the Indian subcontinent , 2009 .

[30]  Jennifer Hayes Clark,et al.  Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-like stone technology of the Bose basin, South China. , 2000, Science.

[31]  P. Brantingham,et al.  14. Initial Upper Paleolithic Blade Industries from the North-Central Gobi Desert, Mongolia , 2004 .