Egocentric search for disappearing objects in domestic dogs: evidence for a geometric hypothesis of direction

In several species, the ability to locate a disappearing object is an adaptive component of predatory and social behaviour. In domestic dogs, spatial memory for hidden objects is primarily based on an egocentric frame of reference. We investigated the geometric components of egocentric spatial information used by domestic dogs to locate an object they saw move and disappear. In experiment 1, the distance and the direction between the position of the animal and the hiding location were put in conflict. Results showed that the dogs primarily used the directional information between their own spatial coordinates and the target position. In experiment 2, the accuracy of the dogs in finding a hidden object by using directional information was estimated by manipulating the angular deviation between adjacent hiding locations and the position of the animal. Four angular deviations were tested: 5, 7.5, 10 and 15°. Results showed that the performance of the dogs decreased as a function of the angular deviations but it clearly remained well above chance, revealing that the representation of the dogs for direction is precise. In the discussion, we examine how and why domestic dogs determine the direction in which they saw an object disappear.

[1]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  Geometric rule learning by Clark's nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana). , 2000 .

[2]  M L Spetch,et al.  Overshadowing in landmark learning: touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[3]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans: II. Generality Across Search Tasks , 1997 .

[4]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning in bees , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[5]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Some psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[6]  SIMON BENHAMOU,et al.  Path integration in dogs , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  A. S. Etienne,et al.  Optimizing visual landmarks: two- and three-dimensional minimal landscapes , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Ken Cheng,et al.  More psychophysics of the pigeon's use of landmarks , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[9]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning and visuo-spatial memories in gerbils , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Mechanisms of landmark use in mammals and birds. , 1998 .

[11]  Alan C. Kamil,et al.  The seed-storing corvid Clark's nutcracker learns geometric relationships among landmarks , 1997, Nature.

[12]  S. Healy Spatial representation in animals. , 1998 .

[13]  K. Cheng A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation , 1986, Cognition.

[14]  R. Passingham The hippocampus as a cognitive map J. O'Keefe & L. Nadel, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1978). 570 pp., £25.00 , 1979, Neuroscience.

[15]  ALAN C. KAMIL,et al.  The use of local and global cues by Clark's nutcrackers, Nucifraga columbiana , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  K. Cheng The vector sum model of pigeon landmark use. , 1989 .

[17]  Référentiels spatiaux utilisés dans la réalisation d'un trajet inverse chez le chien , 1982 .

[18]  N. Chapuis,et al.  Short Cuts by Dogs in Natural Surroundings , 1987 .

[19]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Varieties of Spatial Cognition , 1990 .

[20]  K. Cheng,et al.  The determination of direction in landmark-based spatial search in pigeons: A further test of the vector sum model , 1994 .

[21]  F. Doré,et al.  Spatial encoding in domestic cats (Felis catus). , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  The use of relative and absolute bearings by Clark’s nutcrackers,Nucifraga columbiana , 2001 .

[23]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[24]  A. Etienne,et al.  Role of dead reckoning in navigation , 1998 .

[25]  Philip H. Brownell Prey Detection by the Sand Scorpion , 1984 .

[26]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Landmark use by pigeons in a touch-screen spatial search task , 1992 .

[27]  Adèle,et al.  The Development and Neural Bases of Higher Cognitive Functions. A conference. May 20-24, 1989, Philadelphia, Pa. , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[28]  L. Nadel Varieties of spatial cognition. Psychobiological considerations. , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  G. K. Wallace Visual Scanning in the Desert Locust Schistocerca Gregaria Forskål , 1959 .

[30]  S. Fiset,et al.  Duration of dogs' (Canis familiaris) working memory in search for disappearing objects , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[31]  R. Wehner,et al.  Visual navigation in insects: coupling of egocentric and geocentric information , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[32]  Nora S. Newcombe,et al.  Spatial representation and behavior across the life span , 1981 .

[33]  M L Spetch,et al.  Learning the configuration of a landmark array: I. Touch-screen studies with pigeons and humans. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[34]  W. T. Tomlinson,et al.  Hamsters remember spatial information derived from olfactory cues , 1991 .

[35]  M Zanforlin,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[36]  Juan Pedro Vargas,et al.  Encoding of geometric and featural spatial information by goldfish (Carassius auratus). , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[37]  A comparative study of geometric rule learning by nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana), pigeons (Columba livia), and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). , 2002 .

[38]  B. A. Cartwright,et al.  How honey bees use landmarks to guide their return to a food source , 1982, Nature.

[39]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Spatial errors made by infants: inadequate spatial cues or evidence of egocentrism? , 1978, British journal of psychology.

[40]  J. Gavin Bremner,et al.  Egocentric Versus Allocentric Spatial Coding in Nine-Month-Old Infants: Factors Influencing the Choice of Code , 1978 .

[41]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish , 2002, Cognition.

[42]  C Beaulieu,et al.  Spatial encoding of hidden objects in dogs (Canis familiaris). , 2000, Journal of comparative psychology.

[43]  H. W. Nissen,et al.  Spatial separation in the delayed response performance of chimpanzees. , 1941 .

[44]  A. Bennett,et al.  Spatial memory in a food storing corvid , 1993, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[45]  David F. Sherry,et al.  Landmark-based spatial memory in birds (Parus atricapillus and Columba livia): The use of edges and distances to represent spatial positions. , 1992 .

[46]  Marcia L. Spetch,et al.  Control of pigeons' spatial search by graphic landmarks in a touch-screen task. , 1993 .

[47]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Distance estimation in the mongolian gerbil: The role of dynamic depth cues , 1984, Behavioural Brain Research.

[48]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[49]  A. Etienne,et al.  Optimizing distal landmarks: horizontal versus vertical structures and relation to background , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[50]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape , 1988 .

[51]  Debbie M. Kelly,et al.  Pigeons' (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. , 1998 .

[52]  J. Neiworth,et al.  A test of object permanence in a new-world monkey species, cotton top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[53]  Robert Pasnak,et al.  Object permanence in cats and dogs , 1981 .

[54]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: a test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). , 1990, Journal of comparative psychology.

[55]  K. Cheng Distances and directions are computed separately by honeybees in landmark-based search , 1998 .

[56]  Valeria Anna Sovrano,et al.  Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiseni) views it: conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial reorientation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[57]  A. Etienne,et al.  The effect of a single light cue on homing behaviour of the golden hamster , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  C. Thinus-Blanc,et al.  Dissociation of Mechanisms Involved in Dogs’ Oriented Displacements , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.