Social Robots on a Global Stage: Establishing a Role for Culture During Human-Robot Interaction

Robotic agents designed to assist people across a variety of social and service settings are becoming increasingly prevalent across the world. Here we synthesise two decades of empirical evidence from human–robot interaction (HRI) research to focus on cultural influences on expectations towards and responses to social robots, as well as the utility of robots displaying culturally specific social cues for improving human engagement. Findings suggest complex and intricate relationships between culture and human cognition in the context of HRI. The studies reviewed here transcend the often-studied and prototypical east–west dichotomy of cultures, and explore how people’s perceptions of robots are informed by their national culture as well as their experiences with robots. Many of the findings presented in this review raise intriguing questions concerning future directions for robotics designers and cultural psychologists, in terms of conceptualising and delivering culturally sensitive robots. We point out that such development is currently limited by heterogenous methods and low statistical power, which contribute to a concerning lack of generalisability. We also propose several avenues through which future work may begin to address these shortcomings. In sum, we highlight the critical role of culture in mediating efforts to develop robots aligned with human users’ cultural backgrounds, and argue for further research into the role of culturally-informed robotic development in facilitating human–robot interaction.

[1]  Anara Sandygulova,et al.  Cross-cultural differences for adaptive strategies of robots in public spaces , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[2]  A. Hochschild The Managed Heart , 1983 .

[3]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Child-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Challenges , 2013, ICSR.

[4]  E. Diener,et al.  Individualism: A Valid and Important Dimension of Cultural Differences Between Nations , 2005, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[5]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Effectiveness of Social Behaviors for Autonomous Wheelchair Robot to Support Elderly People in Japan , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  Gabriele Trovato,et al.  Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Emotion Expressive Humanoid Robotic Head: Recognition of Facial Expressions and Symbols , 2013, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[7]  Irena Papadopoulos,et al.  The Influence of Culture on Attitudes Towards Humanoid and Animal‐like Robots: An Integrative Review , 2018, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[8]  A. Sciutti,et al.  The perception of a robot partner’s effort elicits a sense of commitment to human-robot interaction , 2019, Interaction Studies.

[9]  Norihiro Hagita,et al.  Social acceptance toward a childcare support robot system: web-based cultural differences investigation and a field study in Japan , 2017, Adv. Robotics.

[10]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Culturally Variable Preferences for Robot Design and Use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[11]  M. Brewer,et al.  Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. , 2007, Psychological review.

[12]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[13]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[14]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Perception of Emotion in Artificial Agents , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[15]  Björn W. Schuller,et al.  Measuring Engagement in Robot-Assisted Autism Therapy: A Cross-Cultural Study , 2017, Front. Robot. AI.

[16]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  EMPIRICAL RESULTS ON DETERMINANTS OF ACCEPTANCE AND EMOTION ATTRIBUTION IN CONFRONTATION WITH A ROBOT RABBIT , 2011, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Ibn Sina Steps Out: Exploring Arabic Attitudes Toward Humanoid Robots , 2010 .

[19]  M. Joosse,et al.  Cultural differences in how an engagement-seeking robot should approach a group of people , 2014, CABS '14.

[20]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Robots in Society, Society in Robots , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  C. Hui,et al.  The Shortened lndividualism-Collectivism Scale: Its Relationship to Demographic and Work-Related Variables , 1994 .

[22]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2014, ICSR.

[23]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Cultural Differences in Perception and Attitude towards Robots , 2014 .

[24]  Mark A. Neerincx,et al.  Child's culture-related experiences with a social robot at diabetes camps , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  What Difference Does a Robot Make? The Material Enactment of Distributed Coordination , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[26]  John Michael,et al.  Feeling committed to a robot: why, what, when and how? , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[27]  Heather M. Coon,et al.  Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  C. Heyes Précis of Cognitive Gadgets: The Cultural Evolution of Thinking , 2018, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[29]  Tatsuo Arai,et al.  Perceived Comfortableness of Anthropomorphized Robots in U.S. and Japan , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[30]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Editorial overview: Culture: Advances in the science of culture and psychology. , 2016, Current opinion in psychology.

[31]  C. Heyes,et al.  Sociocultural memory development research drives new directions in gadgetry science , 2018, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Investigating the influence of culture on proxemic behaviors for humanoid robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[33]  Benjamin J. Southwell,et al.  Human Object Recognition Using Colour and Depth Information from an RGB-D Kinect Sensor , 2013 .

[34]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[35]  Edward Sapir,et al.  Culture, language and personality , 1966 .

[36]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human-Robot Teams Collaborating Socially, Organizationally, and Culturally , 2011 .

[37]  M. Mori THE UNCANNY VALLEY , 2020, The Monster Theory Reader.

[38]  Maha Salem,et al.  Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of Politeness and Culture on Robot Acceptance and Anthropomorphization , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[39]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Investigating the Effect of Relative Cultural Distance on the Acceptance of Robots , 2015, ICSR.

[40]  KrahmerEmiel,et al.  Child-robot interaction across cultures , 2014 .

[41]  H. Klug,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS CHANGES PREDICTIONS ABOUT INTERACTING PHENOTYPES , 2012, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[42]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Investigating cooperation with robotic peers , 2019, PloS one.

[43]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Social Cognition in the Age of Human–Robot Interaction , 2020, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  Hiroko Kamide,et al.  One being for two origins — A necessary awakening for the future of robotics , 2016, 2016 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[45]  G. Altmann Science and Linguistics , 1993 .

[46]  J. Cassell,et al.  Nudge nudge wink wink: elements of face-to-face conversation for embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[47]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The Cross-cultural Acceptance of Tutoring Robots with Augmented Reality Services , 2009, J. Digit. Content Technol. its Appl..

[48]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[49]  Xuan Zhao,et al.  What is Human-like?: Decomposing Robots’ Human-like Appearance Using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) Database , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[50]  Kerstin Sophie Haring,et al.  Perception of a humanoid robot: A cross-cultural comparison , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[51]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[52]  D Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Replication in Psychological Science , 2015, Psychological science.

[53]  H. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and Collectivism: Cross-cultural Perspectives on Self-ingroup Relationships We Wish to Thank Our Research Collaborators for Stimulating Ideas, Data, and Moral Support in Carrying out a Complex Set of Studies. They , 2022 .

[54]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Systematic analysis of video data from different human–robot interaction studies: a categorization of social signals during error situations , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[55]  A. Takanishi,et al.  Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[56]  Takayuki Nagai,et al.  Telepresence Childcare Robot for Playing with Children from a Remote Location , 2015 .

[57]  T. Shibata,et al.  Use of a Therapeutic, Socially Assistive Pet Robot (PARO) in Improving Mood and Stimulating Social Interaction and Communication for People With Dementia: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, JMIR research protocols.

[58]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Effects of Culture on the Credibility of Robot Speech: A Comparison between English and Arabic , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[59]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  A practical guide for transparency in psychological science , 2018 .

[60]  John Hudson,et al.  People’s Attitudes to Robots in Caring for the Elderly , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[61]  Bill Gates,et al.  A robot in every home. , 2007 .

[62]  C. Frith,et al.  Social Cognition in Humans , 2007, Current Biology.

[63]  David Matsumoto,et al.  CULTURE AND NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR , 2006 .

[64]  Ryohei Nakatsu,et al.  Cultural Robotics: The Culture of Robotics and Robotics in Culture , 2013 .

[65]  Frédéric Kaplan,et al.  Who is Afraid of the Humanoid? Investigating Cultural Differences in the Acceptance of Robots , 2004, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[66]  C. Bartneck,et al.  Cross-cultural study of expressive avatars , 2004 .

[67]  Takashi Kido Grand Challenge Problems on Cross Cultural Communication: Toward Socially Intelligent Agents , 1998, CIA.

[68]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  Adaptive Robotic Tutors that Support Self-Regulated Learning: A Longer-Term Investigation with Primary School Children , 2018, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[69]  Selma Sabanović,et al.  Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics , 2014, Social studies of science.

[70]  Elena Torta,et al.  Evaluation of a Small Socially-Assistive Humanoid Robot in Intelligent Homes for the Care of the Elderly , 2014, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..

[71]  Pieter Jan Stappers,et al.  Co-creation and the new landscapes of design , 2008 .

[72]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Questionnaire-based social research on opinions of Japanese visitors for communication robots at an exhibition , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[73]  Reid G. Simmons,et al.  Expressing ethnicity through behaviors of a robot character , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[74]  Byron Reeves,et al.  Robots as New Media: A Cross-Cultural Examination of Social and Cognitive Responses to Robotic and On-Screen Agents , 2002 .

[75]  T. Ng,et al.  Acculturation and cross-cultural adaptation : the moderating role of social support , 2017 .

[76]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Individuals’ Evaluations of and Attitudes Towards Potentially Uncanny Robots , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[77]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets? , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[78]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[79]  Amy Loutfi,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Evaluation of Domestic Assistive Robots , 2008, AAAI Fall Symposium: AI in Eldercare: New Solutions to Old Problems.

[80]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[81]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  A neurocognitive investigation of the impact of socialising with a robot on empathy for pain , 2018, bioRxiv.

[82]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Developmental Robotics: From Babies to Robots , 2015 .

[83]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[84]  Emiel Krahmer,et al.  Child-robot interaction across cultures: How does playing a game with a social robot compare to playing a game alone or with a friend? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[85]  Alessandro G. Di Nuovo,et al.  A cross-cultural study of acceptance and use of robotics by future psychology practitioners , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[86]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[87]  A. Hochschild The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling , 1985 .

[88]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[89]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures , 2008, AI & SOCIETY.

[90]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[91]  Patricia O'Neill-Brown,et al.  Setting the Stage for the Culturally Adaptive Agent , 1997 .

[92]  G. Northoff,et al.  Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[93]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Long-Term Interactions with Empathic Robots: Evaluating Perceived Support in Children , 2012, ICSR.

[94]  Markus Vincze,et al.  Investigating the Influence of Culture on Helping Behavior Towards Service Robots , 2017, HRI.

[95]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[96]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Three's company, or a crowd?: The effects of robot number and behavior on HRI in Japan and the USA , 2015, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[97]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[98]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  The Influence of Robot Appearance and Interactive Ability in HRI: A Cross-Cultural Study , 2016, ICSR.

[99]  P. Hinds,et al.  When in Rome: the role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations , 2010, HRI 2010.

[100]  A. Meltzoff 'Like me': a foundation for social cognition. , 2007, Developmental science.

[101]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[102]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Social categorization of social robots: anthropomorphism as a function of robot group membership. , 2012, The British journal of social psychology.

[103]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[104]  Takanori Shibata,et al.  Cross-Cultural Studies on Subjective Evaluation of a Seal Robot , 2009, Adv. Robotics.

[105]  Satoshi Suzuki,et al.  Can differences of nationalities be induced and measured by robot gesture communication ? , 2011, 2011 4th International Conference on Human System Interactions, HSI 2011.

[106]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[107]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[108]  Nicolas Spatola,et al.  National Stereotypes and Robots' Perception: The “Made in” Effect , 2019, Front. Robot. AI.

[109]  Nikolaos Mavridis,et al.  Opinions and attitudes toward humanoid robots in the Middle East , 2011, AI & SOCIETY.

[110]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[111]  G. Hofstede,et al.  The Hofstede model , 2010 .

[112]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Deep Neural Networks Are More Accurate Than Humans at Detecting Sexual Orientation From Facial Images , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[113]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[114]  Paul Baxter,et al.  Child-robot interaction in the wild: advice to the aspiring experimenter , 2011, ICMI '11.

[115]  T. Kanda,et al.  A cross-cultural study on attitudes towards robots , 2005 .