Spatial Summation in the Receptive Fields of MT Neurons

Receptive fields (RFs) of cells in the middle temporal area (MT or V5) of monkeys will often encompass multiple objects under normal image viewing. We therefore have studied how multiple moving stimuli interact when presented within and near the RF of single MT cells. We used moving Gabor function stimuli, <1° in spatial extent and ∼100 msec in duration, presented on a grid of possible locations over the RF of the cell. Responses to these stimuli were typically robust, and their small spatial and temporal extent allowed detailed mapping of RFs and of interactions between stimuli. The responses to pairs of such stimuli were compared against the responses to the same stimuli presented singly. The responses were substantially less than the sum of the responses to the component stimuli and were well described by a power-law summation model with divisive inhibition. Such divisive inhibition is a key component of recently proposed “normalization” models of cortical physiology and is presumed to arise from lateral interconnections within a region. One open question is whether the normalization occurs only once in primary visual cortex or multiple times in different cortical areas. We addressed this question by exploring the spatial extent over which one stimulus would divide the response to another and found effective normalization from stimuli quite far removed from the RF center. This supports models under which normalization occurs both in MT and in earlier stages.

[1]  F. Gallyas Silver staining of myelin by means of physical development. , 1979, Neurological research.

[2]  B. Richmond,et al.  Implantation of magnetic search coils for measurement of eye position: An improved method , 1980, Vision Research.

[3]  Lance M. Optican,et al.  Unix-based multiple-process system, for real-time data acquisition and control , 1982 .

[4]  D C Van Essen,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in middle temporal visual area of the macaque monkey. I. Selectivity for stimulus direction, speed, and orientation. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .

[7]  J Allman,et al.  Direction- and Velocity-Specific Responses from beyond the Classical Receptive Field in the Middle Temporal Visual Area (MT) , 1985, Perception.

[8]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Hidehiko Komatsu,et al.  A grid system and a microsyringe for single cell recording , 1988, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[10]  B. Connors,et al.  Intrinsic firing patterns of diverse neocortical neurons , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Pathways for motion analysis: Cortical connections of the medial superior temporal and fundus of the superior temporal visual areas in the macaque , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  Thomas D. Albright,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual motion coherence , 1992, Nature.

[14]  R. Born,et al.  Segregation of global and local motion processing in primate middle temporal visual area , 1993, Nature.

[15]  A. Watson,et al.  The optimal motion stimulus , 1995, Vision Research.

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Orban,et al.  Shape and Spatial Distribution of Receptive Fields and Antagonistic Motion Surrounds in the Middle Temporal Area (V5) of the Macaque , 1995, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  Anthony J. Movshon,et al.  Visual Response Properties of Striate Cortical Neurons Projecting to Area MT in Macaque Monkeys , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Responses of MT and MST neurons to one and two moving objects in the receptive field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic Depression and Cortical Gain Control , 1997, Science.

[21]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  G. Orban,et al.  Size and shape of receptive fields in the medial superior temporal area (MST) of the macaque , 1997, Neuroreport.

[23]  S G Lisberger,et al.  Neuronal responses in visual areas MT and MST during smooth pursuit target selection. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT , 1998, Vision Research.

[25]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.