Interocular induction of illusory size perception

BackgroundThe perceived size of objects not only depends on their physical size but also on the surroundings in which they appear. For example, an object surrounded by small items looks larger than a physically identical object surrounded by big items (Ebbinghaus illusion), and a physically identical but distant object looks larger than an object that appears closer in space (Ponzo illusion). Activity in human primary visual cortex (V1) reflects the perceived rather than the physical size of objects, indicating an involvement of V1 in illusory size perception. Here we investigate the role of eye-specific signals in two common size illusions in order to provide further information about the mechanisms underlying illusory size perception.ResultsWe devised stimuli so that an object and its spatial context associated with illusory size perception could be presented together to one eye or separately to two eyes. We found that the Ponzo illusion had an equivalent magnitude whether the objects and contexts were presented to the same or different eyes, indicating that it may be largely mediated by binocular neurons. In contrast, the Ebbinghaus illusion became much weaker when objects and their contexts were presented to different eyes, indicating important contributions to the illusion from monocular neurons early in the visual pathway.ConclusionsOur findings show that two well-known size illusions - the Ponzo illusion and the Ebbinghaus illusion - are mediated by different neuronal populations, and suggest that the underlying neural mechanisms associated with illusory size perception differ and can be dependent on monocular channels in the early visual pathway.

[1]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Somatic mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway in lung cancers , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[2]  Chen Huiping,et al.  Loss of RALT/MIG-6 expression in ERBB2-amplified breast carcinomas enhances ErbB-2 oncogenic potency and favors resistance to Herceptin , 2005, Oncogene.

[3]  C. Marshall,et al.  Specificity of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: Transient versus sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation , 1995, Cell.

[4]  Gregory C DeAngelis,et al.  Disparity Channels in Early Vision , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Illusion effects on grasping are temporally constant not dynamic. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  R. Blake,et al.  Interocular Transfer of Expansion, Rotation, and Translation Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[7]  T Pawson,et al.  The epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylates GTPase-activating protein (GAP) at Tyr-460, adjacent to the GAP SH2 domains , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.

[8]  C. Slaughter,et al.  ERK phosphorylation potentiates Elk‐1‐mediated ternary complex formation and transactivation. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[9]  V Torri,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression correlates with a poor prognosis in completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  David L. Brautigan,et al.  The Specificity of Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase 2 Dephosphorylation by Protein Phosphatases* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Joseph Schlessinger,et al.  Ligand-Induced, Receptor-Mediated Dimerization and Activation of EGF Receptor , 2002, Cell.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  Arnold W. M. Smeulders,et al.  Brain responses strongly correlate with Weibull image statistics when processing natural images. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[14]  Paul W Sternberg,et al.  CONSPIRACY THEORY : RAS AND RAF DO NOT ACT ALONE , 1998 .

[15]  Brian A. Wandell,et al.  Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[16]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Complete Pattern of Ocular Dominance Columns in Human Primary Visual Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Hideo Sakata,et al.  Neural mechanisms of three-dimensional vision , 2005, Neuroscience Research.

[18]  H. Lane,et al.  ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[19]  Z. Kam,et al.  c-Cbl/Sli-1 regulates endocytic sorting and ubiquitination of the epidermal growth factor receptor. , 1998, Genes & development.

[20]  Patricia L. Harris,et al.  Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Haber,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib. , 2007, Cancer research.

[22]  H. Auer,et al.  Tissue-Wide Expression Profiling Using cDNA Subtraction and Microarrays to Identify Tumor-Specific Genes , 2004, Cancer Research.

[23]  A. Yoshimura,et al.  Model analysis of difference between EGF pathway and FGF pathway. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[24]  M. Cobb,et al.  Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. , 2001, Endocrine reviews.

[25]  H. Poulsen,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and EGFR mutations, function and possible role in clinical trials. , 1997, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  D W Massaro,et al.  Judgmental model of the Ebbinghaus illusion. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[27]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Insulin receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor dephosphorylation by three major rat liver protein-tyrosine phosphatases expressed in a recombinant bacterial system. , 1992, The Biochemical journal.

[28]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[29]  Hiroshi Tanaka,et al.  Mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor is associated with MIG6 expression , 2009, The FEBS journal.

[30]  J. Brugge,et al.  Controlled Dimerization of ErbB Receptors Provides Evidence for Differential Signaling by Homo- and Heterodimers , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[31]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Orientation Selectivity and the Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Striate Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Matthew Meyerson,et al.  Structures of lung cancer-derived EGFR mutants and inhibitor complexes: mechanism of activation and insights into differential inhibitor sensitivity. , 2007, Cancer cell.

[34]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Patterns of excitation and inhibition evoked by horizontal connections in visual cortex share a common relationship to orientation columns , 1995, Neuron.

[35]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  S. Kimura,et al.  A computational model on the modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Akt pathways in heregulin-induced ErbB signalling. , 2003, The Biochemical journal.

[37]  Zhaoping Li,et al.  A Neural Model of Contour Integration in the Primary Visual Cortex , 1998, Neural Computation.

[38]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  L. Wodicka,et al.  A small molecule–kinase interaction map for clinical kinase inhibitors , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[40]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[41]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[42]  Julian Downward,et al.  Epidermal growth factor regulates p21 ras through the formation of a complex of receptor, Grb2 adapter protein, and Sos nucleotide exchange factor , 1993, Cell.

[43]  N. Normanno,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. , 2006, Gene.

[44]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[45]  Stuart Thomson,et al.  Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. , 2006, Cancer research.

[46]  Kazuko Sakai,et al.  In-frame deletion in the EGF receptor alters kinase inhibition by gefitinib. , 2006, The Biochemical journal.

[47]  Igor Goryanin,et al.  The impact of the regulatory design on the response of epidermal growth factor receptor‐mediated signal transduction towards oncogenic mutations , 2007, The FEBS journal.

[48]  O. Segatto,et al.  The evolutionarily conserved EBR module of RALT/MIG6 mediates suppression of the EGFR catalytic activity , 2007, Oncogene.

[49]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[50]  M. Moran,et al.  Association of p120 ras GAP with endocytic components and colocalization with epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor in response to EGF stimulation. , 1996, Cell growth & differentiation : the molecular biology journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[51]  R. Nicholson,et al.  EGFR and cancer prognosis. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[52]  Monilola A. Olayioye,et al.  The ErbB signaling network: receptor heterodimerization in development and cancer , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[53]  Chan Zeng,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[54]  S. Gabriel,et al.  EGFR Mutations in Lung Cancer: Correlation with Clinical Response to Gefitinib Therapy , 2004, Science.

[55]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Synaptic physiology of horizontal connections in the cat's visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[56]  H W Leibowitz,et al.  The relation between age and the magnitude of the Ponzo illusion. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[57]  Robert Fox,et al.  The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation , 1973 .

[58]  C. Chuang,et al.  Functional divergence of the MAP kinase pathway ERK1 and ERK2 activate specific transcription factors , 1994, FEBS letters.

[59]  GERALD H. FISHER Detection of Visual Stimuli located within Angles , 1967, Nature.

[60]  E. Henson,et al.  Surviving cell death through epidermal growth factor (EGF) signal transduction pathways: implications for cancer therapy. , 2006, Cellular signalling.

[61]  H. Varmus,et al.  Acquired Resistance of Lung Adenocarcinomas to Gefitinib or Erlotinib Is Associated with a Second Mutation in the EGFR Kinase Domain , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[62]  M. Meyerson,et al.  The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  Steven C. Dakin,et al.  Flank facilitation and contour integration: Different sites , 2006, Vision Research.

[64]  S. Keyse,et al.  Protein phosphatases and the regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling. , 2000, Current opinion in cell biology.

[65]  D. Engelman,et al.  Two EGF molecules contribute additively to stabilization of the EGFR dimer , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[66]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[67]  L. Maffei,et al.  Interocular transfer of adaptation after effect in neurons of area 17 and 18 of split chiasm cats. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  P. Dayan,et al.  Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[69]  R. Wilson,et al.  EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from "never smokers" and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  Nicholas J. Wade,et al.  The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt illusion , 1980, Vision Research.

[71]  W. Kolch Meaningful relationships: the regulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway by protein interactions. , 2000, The Biochemical journal.

[72]  B. Margolis,et al.  The phosphotyrosine interaction domain of Shc binds an LXNPXY motif on the epidermal growth factor receptor , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[73]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.