Neural model for processing the influence of visual orientation on visually perceived eye level (VPEL)

An individual line or a combination of lines viewed in darkness has a large influence on the elevation to which an observer sets a target so that it is perceived to lie at eye level (VPEL). These influences are systematically related to the orientation of pitched-from-vertical lines on pitched plane(s) and to the lengths of the lines, as well as to the orientations of lines of 'equivalent pitch' that lie on frontoparallel planes. A three-stage model processes the visual influence: The first stage parallel processes the orientations of the lines utilizing 2 classes of orientation-sensitive neural units in each hemisphere, with the two classes sensitive to opposing ranges of orientations; the signal delivered by each class is of opposite sign in the two hemispheres. The second stage generates the total visual influence from the parallel combination of inputs delivered by the 4 groups of the first stage, and a third stage combines the total visual influence from the second stage with signals from the body-referenced mechanism that contains information about the position and orientation of the eyes, head, and body. The circuit equation describing the combined influence of n separate inputs from stage 1 on the output of the stage 2 integrating neuron is derived for n stimulus lines which possess any combination of orientations and lengths; Each of the n lines is assumed to stimulate one of the groups of orientation-sensitive units in visual cortex (stage 1) whose signals converge on to a dendrite of the integrating neuron (stage 2), and to produce changes in postsynaptic membrane conductance (g(i)) and potential (V(i)) there. The net current from the n dendrites results in a voltage change (V(A)) at the initial segment of the axon of the integrating neuron. Nerve impulse frequency proportional to this voltage change signals the total visual influence on perceived elevation of the visual field. The circuit equation corresponding to the total visual influence for n equal length inducing lines is V(A)= sum V(i)/[n+(g(A)/g(S))], where the potential change due to line i, V(i), is proportional to line orientation, g(A) is the conductance at the axon's summing point, and g(S)=g(i) for each i for the equal length case; the net conductance change due to a line is proportional to the line's length. The circuit equation is interpreted as a basis for quantitative predictions from the model that can be compared to psychophysical measurements of the elevation of VPEL. The interpretation provides the predicted relation for the visual influence on VPEL, V, by n inducing lines each with length l: thus, V=a+[k(i) sum theta(i)/n+(k(2)/l)], where theta(i) is the orientation of line i, a is the effect of the body-referenced mechanism, and k(1) and k(2) are constants. The model's output is fitted to the results of five sets of experiments in which the elevation of VPEL measured with a small target in the median plane is systematically influenced by distantly located 1-line or 2-line inducing stimuli varying in orientation and length and viewed in otherwise total darkness with gaze restricted to the median plane; each line is located at either 25 degrees eccentricity to the left or right of the median plane. The model predicts the negatively accelerated growth of VPEL with line length for each orientation and the change of slope constant of the linear combination rule among lines from 1.00 (linear summation; short lines) to 0.61 (near-averaging; long lines). Fits to the data are obtained over a range of orientations from -30 degrees to +30 degrees of pitch for 1-line visual fields from lengths of 3 degrees to 64 degrees, for parallel 2-line visual fields over the same range of lengths and orientations, for short and long 2-line combinations in which each of the two members may have any orientation (parallel or nonparallel pairs), and for the well-illuminated and fully structured pitchroom. In addition, similar experiments with 2-line stimuli of equivalent pitch in the frontoparallel plane were also fitted to the model. The model accounts for more than 98% of the variance of the results in each case.

[1]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The projections of cells in different layers of the cat's visual cortex , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[2]  C. Galletti,et al.  Functional Properties of Neurons in the Anterior Bank of the Parieto‐occipital Sulcus of the Macaque Monkey , 1991, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Modeling active dendritic processes in pyramidal neurons , 1998 .

[4]  L Matin,et al.  Critical duration, the differential luminance threshold, critical flicker frequency, and visual adaptation: a theoretical treatment. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[5]  Idan Segev,et al.  Methods in Neuronal Modeling , 1988 .

[6]  L. Matin,et al.  Change in Visually Perceived Eye Level without Change in Perceived Pitch , 1998, Perception.

[7]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[8]  M A Goodale,et al.  Dissociation between two modes of spatial processing by a visual form agnosic , 1995, Neuroreport.

[9]  Leonard Matin,et al.  Visual Localization and Eye Movements , 1982 .

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Cortical and callosal connections concerned with the vertical meridian of visual fields in the cat. , 1967, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  H Sherk,et al.  The visual claustrum of the cat. I. Structure and connections , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  L. Matin Eye Movements and Perceived Visual Direction , 1972 .

[13]  L. Matin,et al.  Multimodal basis for egocentric spatial localization and orientation. , 1995, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[14]  L. Matin,et al.  Differences in influence between pitched-from-vertical lines and slanted-from-frontal horizontal lines on egocentric localization , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. Stevens,et al.  Oculoparalytic illusion: visual-field dependent spatial mislocalizations by humans partially paralyzed with curare. , 1982, Science.

[16]  R B Welch,et al.  The Role of Retinal versus Perceived Size in the Effects of Pitched Displays on Visually Perceived Eye Level , 1996, Perception.

[17]  Semir Zeki,et al.  THE ANATOMY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF AREA V6 OF MACAQUE MONKEY VISUAL-CORTEX , 1986 .

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Binocularly Driven Neurons in Visual Cortex of Split-Chiasm Cats , 1968, Science.

[19]  D. Tank,et al.  Dendritic Integration in Mammalian Neurons, a Century after Cajal , 1996, Neuron.

[20]  T. Hudson,et al.  Independent mechanisms produce visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and perceived visual pitch (PVP) , 2000, Vision Research.

[21]  L. Matin,et al.  The influence of a stationary single line in darkness on the visual perception of eye level , 1994, Vision Research.

[22]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  Linear combinations of signals from two lines of the same or different orientations , 2000, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Barraud,et al.  Effects of a visual frame and of low radial accelerations on the visually perceived eye level , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  S. Levay,et al.  The visual claustrum of the cat. III. Receptive field properties , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Clustered intrinsic connections in cat visual cortex , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  E. Callaway Local circuits in primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1998, Annual review of neuroscience.

[28]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Coding of image contrast in central visual pathways of the macaque monkey , 1990, Vision Research.

[29]  H. A. Witkin Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field. , 1949 .

[30]  Sheldon M. Ebenholtz,et al.  Effects of optical pitch on oculomotor control and the perception of target elevation , 1995 .

[31]  J R Lackner,et al.  Some influences of touch and pressure cues on human spatial orientation. , 1978, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[32]  Malcolm M. Cohen Visual-Proprioceptive Interactions , 1981 .

[33]  L. Matin,et al.  Saccadic suppression of displacement: Separate influences of saccade size and of target retinal eccentricity , 1997, Vision Research.

[34]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  L. Matin,et al.  Averaging and summation of influences on visually perceived eye level between two long lines differing in pitch or roll-tilt , 1999, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Lund,et al.  Interlaminar connections and pyramidal neuron organisation in the visual cortex, area 17, of the Macaque monkey , 1975 .

[37]  James R. Lackner,et al.  Some Mechanisms Underlying Sensory and Postural Stability in Man , 1978 .

[38]  C. Sherrington Ferrier lecture.—Some functional problems attaching to convergence , 1929 .

[39]  J. Lund,et al.  The origin of efferent pathways from the primary visual cortex, area 17, of the macaque monkey as shown by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase , 1975, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[40]  C. Gross,et al.  Topographical organization of cortical afferents to extrastriate visual area PO in the macaque: A dual tracer study , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[41]  R B Welch,et al.  Accuracy and adaptation of reaching and pointing in pitched visual environments , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  W. Precht The synaptic organization of the brain G.M. Shepherd, Oxford University Press (1975). 364 pp., £3.80 (paperback) , 1976, Neuroscience.

[43]  R. Andersen,et al.  The influence of the angle of gaze upon the excitability of the light- sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[44]  L. Matin,et al.  Influences of visual pitch and visual yaw on visually perceived eye level (VPEL) and straight ahead (VPSA) for erect and rolled-to-horizontal observers , 2001, Vision Research.

[45]  Alexander H. Wertheim,et al.  Tutorials on motion perception , 1982 .

[46]  Leonard Matin,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of Experimental Extraocular Muscle Paralysis , 1983 .

[47]  S. Levay,et al.  The visual claustrum of the cat. II. The visual field map , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[48]  C. R. Fox,et al.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: Linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity , 1989, Vision Research.

[49]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[50]  S. Zeki A vision of the brain , 1993 .

[51]  L Matin,et al.  Visually Perceived Eye Level is Influenced Identically by Lines from Erect and Pitched Planes , 1996, Perception.

[52]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[53]  R. Andersen Visual and eye movement functions of the posterior parietal cortex. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[54]  R. Andersen,et al.  Callosal and prefrontal associational projecting cell populations in area 7A of the macaque monkey: A study using retrogradely transported fluorescent dyes , 1985, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  R. B. Post,et al.  Why do pitched horizontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived eye level? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[56]  D. Hubel Eye, brain, and vision , 1988 .

[57]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[58]  M M Cohen,et al.  Visual and somesthetic influences on postural orientation in the median plane , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[59]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  M M Cohen,et al.  Effect of structured visual environments on apparent eye level , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  L. Matin,et al.  The influence of saccade length on the saccadic suppression of displacement detection , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[62]  A GRAYBIEL,et al.  Oculogravic illusion. , 1952, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[63]  Isotropic visual field effect on spatial orientation and egocentric localization. , 1998, Spatial vision.

[64]  L Matin,et al.  Visually perceived eye level: changes induced by a pitched-from-vertical 2-line visual field. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Carol M. Petito The Synaptic Organization of the Brain, 4th Ed , 1998 .

[66]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[67]  Leonard Matin,et al.  Saccadic suppression of displacement: Influence of postsaccadic exposure duration and of saccadic stimulus elimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[68]  S. Levay,et al.  Contribution of the cortico-claustral loop to receptive field properties in area 17 of the cat , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[69]  D. H. Paul The physiology of nerve cells , 1975 .

[70]  Johannes Dichgans,et al.  Characteristics of moving visual scenes influencing spatial orientation , 1975, Vision Research.

[71]  Malcolm M. Cohen Elevator illusion: Influences of otolith organ activity and neck proprioception , 1973 .

[72]  D. Hubel,et al.  Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor , 1974, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[73]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation. II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[74]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Relationships between horizontal interactions and functional architecture in cat striate cortex as revealed by cross-correlation analysis , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[75]  Perceptual thresholds of radial accelerations as indicated by visually perceived eye level. , 1994, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[76]  D. Johnston,et al.  Foundations of Cellular Neurophysiology , 1994 .

[77]  J. Lackner,et al.  Combined influences of gravitoinertial force level and visual field pitch on visually perceived eye level. , 1997, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[78]  L. Matin,et al.  Light and dark adaptation of visually perceived eye level controlled by visual pitch , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[79]  Mislocalizations of Visual Elevation and Visual Vertical Induced by Visual Pitch: the Great Circle Model a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[80]  G. Henry,et al.  Layering in lamina 6 of cat striate cortex , 1986, Brain Research.

[81]  L. Matin,et al.  Spatial summation among coextensive and parallel line segments across wide separations (50°): Egocentric localization and the Great Circle Model , 1994, Vision Research.