Responses to moving slits by single units in cat striate cortex

SummaryA quantitative study has been made of the responses to moving slit stimuli by single units in the cat striate cortex whose receptive fields lay within 5° of the visual axis. Special attention was given to finding the optimal stimulus parameters including slit width, length, orientation and speed. The analysis was largely based on averaged response vs. time histograms. Using the classification of simple and complex responses types, the units were further subdivided on the basis of the number of modes in the response and on the presence or absence of directional selectivity. Simple unimodal units with directional selectivity (SUDS) had the most specific stimulus requirements and nearly always had zero background activity. Complex units usually had a high level of background activity. SUDS units also showed a preference for horizontally- and vertically ****-orientated stimuli. Whenever the response survived reversal of contrast the directional selectivity remained independent of the change. Optimal stimulus speeds varied widely from unit to unit with a mean at 4°/sec: simple bimodal units and complex units tended to have higher optimal stimulus speeds and responded over a wider range of speeds than did simple unimodal units. While SUDS units with very small receptive fields tended to prefer slowly moving stimuli, in general there was no correlation between receptive field size and optimal stimulus speed.

[1]  R. W. DITCHBURN,et al.  Vision with a Stabilized Retinal Image , 1952, Nature.

[2]  L. Riggs,et al.  The disappearance of steadily fixated visual test objects. , 1953, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  G. Moruzzi,et al.  Effects of complete pontine transections on the sleep-wakefulness rhythm: the midpontine pretrigeminal preparation , 1959 .

[4]  W. Pitts,et al.  Anatomy and Physiology of Vision in the Frog (Rana pipiens) , 1960, The Journal of general physiology.

[5]  E. Marg,et al.  Physiological nystagmus in the cat. , 1960, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[6]  R. Pritchard,et al.  Small eye movements of the cat. , 1960, Canadian journal of psychology.

[7]  B. Burns,et al.  Transmission of information in the unanaesthetized cat's isolated forebrain , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  W. R. Levick,et al.  Modification of a 256‐Channel Scaler for Neurophysiological Time Analysis , 1962 .

[9]  N. Taira,et al.  Sensory transmission in visual pathway in various arousal states of cat. , 1962, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  B. Burns,et al.  Physiological excitation of visual cortex in cat's unanesthetized isolated forebrain. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  W. Burke,et al.  The identification of single units in central visual pathways , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  H. Maturana,et al.  Directional Movement and Horizontal Edge Detectors in the Pigeon Retina , 1963, Science.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Shape and arrangement of columns in cat's striate cortex , 1963, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  W KOZAK,et al.  A NEW PERIMETER AND MOVING FIGURE GENERATOR FOR VISUAL RESEARCH. , 1963, Vision research.

[16]  M. Colonnier THE TANGENTIAL ORGANIZATION OF THE VISUAL CORTEX. , 1964, Journal of anatomy.

[17]  H. Barlow,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS IN LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS OF CAT TO MOVING VISUAL PATTERNS. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Response of cat retinal ganglion cells to moving visual patterns. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  A. Robertson,et al.  Anæsthesia and Receptive Fields , 1965, Nature.

[21]  O. Grusser,et al.  Frog Retina: Detection of Movement , 1965, Science.

[22]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  R. W. Rodieck,et al.  Analysis of receptive fields of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  D H HUBEL,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  G Horn,et al.  An analysis of spontaneous impulse activity of units in the striate cortex of unrestrained cats , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  J. Stone,et al.  Specialized Receptive Fields of the Cat's Retina , 1966, Science.

[27]  W. Levick Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbit's retina , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  P. O. Bishop Central nervous system: afferent mechanisms and perception. , 1967, Annual Review of Physiology.

[29]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Residual eye movements in receptive-field studies of paralyzed cats. , 1967, Vision research.

[30]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of rinocular single units in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  A. Herz,et al.  Statistische Eigenschaften der Neuronaktivität im ascendierenden visuellen System , 1964, Kybernetik.

[32]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: Simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.