Cognitive Penetrability of Perception in the Age of Prediction: Predictive Systems are Penetrable Systems

[1]  H. Spencer.  The Principles of Psychology - Vol. I , 2016 .

[2]  Tyler Burge,et al.  Reply to Block: Adaptation and the Upper Border of Perception† , 2014 .

[3]  Jessica A. Collins,et al.  Knowledge is power: How conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[4]  Kevin C. Dieter,et al.  Kinesthesis Can Make an Invisible Hand Visible , 2014, Psychological science.

[5]  Chaz Firestone,et al.  " Top-down " Effects Where None Should Be Found: the El Greco Fallacy in Perception Research , 2022 .

[6]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  The cross-modal double flash illusion depends on featural similarity between cross-modal inducers , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[7]  F. Pulvermüller.  How neurons make meaning: brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Language can boost otherwise unseen objects into visual awareness , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Andy Clark,et al.  Are we predictive engines? Perils, prospects, and the puzzle of the porous perceiver. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  A. Clark.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[11]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Manual Experience Shapes Object Representations , 2013, Psychological science.

[12]  Alexander G. Huth,et al.  Attention During Natural Vision Warps Semantic Representation Across the Human Brain , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  S. Siegel.  The epistemic impact of the etiology of experience , 2013 .

[14]  O. Deroy,et al.  Object-sensitivity versus cognitive penetrability of perception , 2013 .

[15]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions , 2012, Cortex.

[16]  Matthew P. H. Gardner,et al.  Effects of Cue-Triggered Expectation on Cortical Processing of Taste , 2012, Neuron.

[17]  D. Stokes.  Perceiving and desiring: a new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience , 2012 .

[18]  G. Lupyan.  Linguistically Modulated Perception and Cognition: The Label-Feedback Hypothesis , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[19]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The evocative power of words: activation of concepts by verbal and nonverbal means. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  G. Lupyan.  Chapter Seven – What Do Words Do? Toward a Theory of Language-Augmented Thought , 2012 .

[21]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[22]  F. Macpherson.  Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism , 2012 .

[23]  K. Moutoussis,et al.  The Effect of Language on Visual Contrast Sensitivity , 2011, Perception.

[24]  D. Gitelman,et al.  The Anterior Insular Cortex Represents Breaches of Taste Identity Expectation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Christina Zelano,et al.  Olfactory Predictive Codes and Stimulus Templates in Piriform Cortex , 2011, Neuron.

[26]  J. Lyons.  CIRCULARITY, RELIABILITY, AND THE COGNITIVE PENETRABILITY OF PERCEPTION , 2011 .

[27]  Britt Anderson,et al.  There is no Such Thing as Attention , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[28]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.

[29]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Visual Effects of Haptic Feedback Are Large but Local , 2011, PloS one.

[30]  Dale Purves,et al.  Understanding vision in wholly empirical terms , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  C. Spence.  Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Iseult A. M. Beets,et al.  Online action-to-perception transfer: Only percept-dependent action affects perception , 2010, Vision Research.

[33]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  The Influence of Language on Perception: Listening to Sentences about Faces Affects the Perception of Faces , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items , 2010 .

[35]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  The penetration of visual representations by conceptual categories , 2010 .

[36]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Making the Invisible Visible: Verbal but Not Visual Cues Enhance Visual Detection , 2010, PloS one.

[38]  Emiliano Macaluso,et al.  Auditory temporal expectations modulate activity in visual cortex , 2010, NeuroImage.

[39]  S. Levinson,et al.  WEIRD languages have misled us, too , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Thomas A. Farmer,et al.  Early Occipital Sensitivity to Syntactic Category Is Based on Form Typicality , 2010, Psychological science.

[41]  Jeroen J. A. van Boxtel,et al.  Opposing effects of attention and consciousness on afterimages , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Conceptual Penetration of Visual Processing , 2010, Psychological science.

[43]  M. Goodale,et al.  Lifting without Seeing: The Role of Vision in Perceiving and Acting upon the Size Weight Illusion , 2010, PloS one.

[44]  Karl J. Friston.  The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[45]  Viola S. Störmer,et al.  Cross-modal cueing of attention alters appearance and early cortical processing of visual stimuli , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  B. Gick,et al.  Aero-tactile integration in speech perception , 2009, Nature.

[47]  H. Rabagliati,et al.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex , 2009, Cognition.

[48]  Mary C Potter,et al.  Detecting and remembering simultaneous pictures in a rapid serial visual presentation. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.

[50]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Seeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  R. Johansson,et al.  Experience Can Change Distinct Size-Weight Priors Engaged in Lifting Objects and Judging their Weights , 2008, Current Biology.

[52]  Karl J. Friston.  Hierarchical Models in the Brain , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[53]  Bahador Bahrami,et al.  Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words , 2008, Current Biology.

[54]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: An epistemological review , 2008, Cognition.

[55]  D. Katz,et al.  Behavioral states, network states, and sensory response variability. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[56]  G. Lupyan.  The conceptual grouping effect: Categories matter (and named categories matter more) , 2008, Cognition.

[57]  Gary Lupyan,et al.  Perceptual processing is facilitated by ascribing meaning to novel stimuli , 2008, Current Biology.

[58]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Chapter 9. Visual Attention , 2008 .

[59]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Head Up, Foot Down , 2008, Psychological science.

[60]  L. Barsalou.  Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[61]  A. Torralba,et al.  The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Motion Detection and Motion Verbs , 2007, Psychological science.

[63]  J. Davidoff,et al.  More accurate size contrast judgments in the Ebbinghaus Illusion by a remote culture. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Early Cross-Modal Interactions in Auditory and Visual Cortex Underlie a Sound-Induced Visual Illusion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  G. Lupyan.  Reuniting Categories, Language, and Perception , 2007 .

[66]  D. Levin,et al.  Distortions in the perceived lightness of faces: the role of race categories. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Memory modulates color appearance , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  Dale Purves,et al.  Comparison of Bayesian and empirical ranking approaches to visual perception. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[69]  Lori L. Holt,et al.  Are there interactive processes in speech perception? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Separate Modulations of Human V1 Associated with Spatial Attention and Task Structure , 2006, Neuron.

[71]  A. Yuille,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.7 July 2006 Special Issue: Probabilistic models of cognition Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? , 2022 .

[72]  D. Smilek,et al.  Revisiting the category effect: The influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search , 2006, Brain Research.

[73]  Robert N. McCauley,et al.  Susceptibility to the Müller-Lyer Illusion, Theory-Neutral Observation, and the Diachronic Penetrability of the Visual Input System , 2006 .

[74]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Building the gist of a scene: the role of global image features in recognition. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[75]  J. Hay,et al.  From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception , 2006 .

[76]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition , 2005 .

[77]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[78]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  Dale Purves,et al.  The Poggendorff illusion explained by natural scene geometry. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  D. Simons,et al.  Do New Objects Capture Attention? , 2005, Psychological science.

[81]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Image segmentation and lightness perception , 2005, Nature.

[82]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Setting up the target template in visual search. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[83]  Dale Purves,et al.  The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[85]  J. Elman.  An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[86]  Kenith V. Sobel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Neural Synergy Between Kinetic Vision and Touch , 2022 .

[87]  Brian N. Pasley,et al.  Subcortical Discrimination of Unperceived Objects during Binocular Rivalry , 2004, Neuron.

[88]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention alters appearance , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[89]  D. Purves,et al.  Size Contrast and Assimilation Explained by the Statistics of Natural Scene Geometry , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[90]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Attention during adaptation weakens negative afterimages. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[91]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[92]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[93]  M. Pinsk,et al.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[94]  Geoffrey M. Ghose,et al.  Attentional modulation in visual cortex depends on task timing , 2002, Nature.

[95]  Dale Purves,et al.  Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Visual illusion induced by sound. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[97]  Lori A. Bica,et al.  Fundamentally misunderstanding visual perception. Adults' belief in visual emissions. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[98]  D. Kersten,et al.  Illusions, perception and Bayes , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[99]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[100]  Christof Koch,et al.  Single-neuron correlates of subjective vision in the human medial temporal lobe , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[102]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Vision Modulates Somatosensory Cortical Processing , 2002, Current Biology.

[103]  K. Clark.  CONDITIONS FOR VERSATILE LEARNING , HELMHOLTZ ’ S UNCONSCIOUS INFERENCE , AND THE TASK OF PERCEPTION , 2002 .

[104]  M. Changizi,et al.  Thirst Modulates a Perception , 2001, Perception.

[105]  S. Shimojo,et al.  When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[106]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Illusions: What you see is what you hear , 2000, Nature.

[107]  Sharon M. Thomas,et al.  The Illusory-Letters Phenomenon: An Illustration of Graphemic Restoration in Visual Word Recognition , 1999, Perception.

[108]  Z. Pylyshyn.  Vision and cognition: How do they connect? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[109]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[110]  Nancy Niedzielski,et al.  The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables , 1999 .

[111]  Elizabeth A. Strand.  Uncovering the Role of Gender Stereotypes in Speech Perception , 1999 .

[112]  D. Brainard,et al.  Mechanisms of color constancy under nearly natural viewing. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[113]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. , 1999 .

[114]  G. Carpenter,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 1999 .

[115]  H. Egeth,et al.  How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[116]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Top-down influences on stereoscopic depth-perception , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[117]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. , 1997, Science.

[118]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[119]  M. Turvey,et al.  Weight perception and the haptic size-weight illusion are functions of the inertia tensor. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[120]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Effects of Categorization on Color Perception , 1995 .

[121]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[122]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[123]  E. Adelson.  Perceptual organization and the judgment of brightness. , 1993, Science.

[124]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Priming and Multiple Memory Systems: Perceptual Mechanisms of Implicit Memory , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[125]  Ronald Melzack,et al.  The Charles Bonnet Syndrome: ‘Phantom Visual Images’ , 1991, Perception.

[126]  H. Barlow.  Conditions for versatile learning, Helmholtz's unconscious inference, and the task of perception , 1990, Vision Research.

[127]  Allen Allport,et al.  Visual attention , 1989 .

[128]  J. Fodor.  A Reply to Churchland's "Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality" , 1988, Philosophy of Science.

[129]  P. Churchland.  Perceptual Plasticity and Theoretical Neutrality: A Reply to Jerry Fodor , 1988, Philosophy of Science.

[130]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Cognitive penetration of the mechanisms of perception: Compensation for coarticulation of lexically restored phonemes , 1988 .

[131]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[132]  J. Fodor.  Observation Reconsidered , 1984, Philosophy of Science.

[133]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[134]  J. Fodor.  The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[135]  D. Swinney.  Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects , 1979 .

[136]  G. Kanizsa,et al.  Organization in Vision: Essays on Gestalt Perception , 1979 .

[137]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[138]  M. Potter.  Meaning in visual search. , 1975, Science.

[139]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[140]  H. Ross.  When is a Weight not Illusory? , 1969, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[141]  R. Gregory,et al.  Distortion of Visual Space as Inappropriate Constancy Scaling , 1963, Nature.

[142]  Rita G. Rudel,et al.  Decrement of Visual and Haptic Müller-lyer Illusion on Repeated Trials: A Study of Crossmodal Transfer , 1963 .

[143]  P. L. Newbigging,et al.  Magnitude and decrement of the Muller-Lyer illusion as a function of pre-training. , 1963, Canadian journal of psychology.

[144]  M. Wertheimer,et al.  Disappearance of the Mueller-Lyer Illusion under Prolonged Inspection , 1957 .

[145]  E. Sapir.  The status of linguistics as a science , 1929 .

[146]  W. J. Fisher.  MATTER AND MEMORY. , 1914, Science.

[147]  Jelliffe.,et al.  Matter and Memory , 1896 .

[148]  W. James.  The principles of psychology , 1983 .

[149]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.