Spontaneous neural encoding of social network position

Unlike many species that enact social behaviour in loose aggregations (such as swarms or herds), humans form groups comprising many long-term, intense, non-reproductive bonds with non-kin1. The cognitive demands of navigating such groups are thought to have significantly influenced human brain evolution2. Yet little is known about how and to what extent the human brain encodes the structure of the social networks in which it is embedded. We characterized the social network of an academic cohort (N = 275); a subset (N = 21) completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study involving viewing individuals who varied in terms of ‘degrees of separation’ from themselves (social distance), the extent to which they were well-connected to well-connected others (eigenvector centrality) and the extent to which they connected otherwise unconnected individuals (brokerage). Understanding these characteristics of social network position requires tracking direct relationships, bonds between third parties and the broader network topology. Pairing network data with multi-voxel pattern analysis, we show that information about social network position is accurately perceived and spontaneously activated when encountering familiar individuals. These findings elucidate how the human brain encodes the structure of its social world and underscore the importance of integrating an understanding of social networks into the study of social perception. Parkinson et al. combine social network analysis and multi-voxel pattern analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to show that the brain spontaneously encodes social distance, the centrality of the individuals encountered, and the extent to which they serve to broker connections between members.

[1]  Demis Hassabis,et al.  Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  G. Galfano,et al.  Social status gates social attention in humans , 2012, Biology Letters.

[3]  R. James R. Blair,et al.  Dominance and Submission: The Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex and Responses to Status Cues , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[6]  Adam M. Kleinbaum,et al.  Popularity, Similarity, and the Network Extraversion Bias , 2014, Psychological science.

[7]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Pymvpa: a Unifying Approach to the Analysis of Neuroscientifi C Data , 2022 .

[8]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[9]  M. Shapiro,et al.  A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[10]  J. S. Guntupalli,et al.  The Representation of Biological Classes in the Human Brain , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Stephen V. Shepherd,et al.  Social status gates social attention in monkeys , 2006, Current Biology.

[12]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[13]  Nao Ninomiya,et al.  The 10th anniversary of journal of visualization , 2007, J. Vis..

[14]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  A Common Cortical Metric for Spatial, Temporal, and Social Distance , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Adam K. Anderson,et al.  Population coding of affect across stimuli, modalities and individuals , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network-Related Personality and the Agency Question: Multirole Evidence from a Virtual World1 , 2012, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[18]  Fenna M. Krienen,et al.  Clan Mentality: Evidence That the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Responds to Close Others , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  R. Burt,et al.  Kinds of Third-Party Effects on Trust , 1995 .

[20]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Bondedness and sociality , 2010 .

[21]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Repetitive TMS over posterior STS disrupts perception of biological motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Social Attention and the Brain , 2009, Current Biology.

[23]  Robin I. M. Dunbar,et al.  Evolution of the Social Brain , 2003, Science.

[24]  Satterthwaite Fe An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. , 1946 .

[25]  Giuseppe Labianca,et al.  Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[26]  Shawn C. Milleville,et al.  Understanding Animate Agents , 2007, Psychological science.

[27]  Gábor Csárdi,et al.  The igraph software package for complex network research , 2006 .

[28]  A. Little,et al.  Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Karla K. Evans,et al.  Spontaneous retrieval of affective person knowledge in face perception , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  Old cortex, new contexts: re-purposing spatial perception for social cognition , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  N. Christakis,et al.  A Model of Genetic Variation in Human Social Networks , 2010 .

[32]  Uta Frith,et al.  Reputation management in the age of the world-wide web , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Daniel Tranel,et al.  Dominance Attributions Following Damage to the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  L. Brent Friends of friends: are indirect connections in social networks important to animal behaviour? , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  An Altercentric Perspective on the Origins of Brokerage in Social Networks: How Perceived Empathy Moderates the Self-Monitoring Effect , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Carolyn Parkinson,et al.  The repurposed social brain , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Single-Neuron Responses in Humans during Execution and Observation of Actions , 2010, Current Biology.

[38]  R. Burt,et al.  Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[39]  J. Haxby,et al.  The representation of self and person knowledge in the medial prefrontal cortex. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[40]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  The posterior parietal cortex and non-spatial cognition , 2009, F1000 biology reports.

[41]  Travis E. Oliphant,et al.  Python for Scientific Computing , 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[42]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[43]  Alexander Borst,et al.  How does Nature Program Neuron Types? , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[44]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Permutation inference for the general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[45]  Jasmin Cloutier,et al.  Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and person evaluation: Forming impressions of others varying in financial and moral status , 2014, NeuroImage.

[46]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  J. Weber,et al.  Neural mechanisms tracking popularity in real-world social networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Eric Jones,et al.  SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python , 2001 .

[49]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Baptiste Gauthier,et al.  Time Is Not Space: Core Computations and Domain-Specific Networks for Mental Travels , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  Decline of violence: Taming the devil within us , 2011, Nature.

[52]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.