Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Dragan Rangelov | Michael Zehetleitner | H. Müller | Michael Zehetleitner | Hermann J Müller | Dragan Rangelov
[1] Eds L. Itti,et al. The primary visual cortex creates a bottom-up saliency map , 2005 .
[2] C. Koch,et al. Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[3] Harold Pashler,et al. Expectation and repetition effects in searching for featural singletons in very brief displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] Dragan Rangelov,et al. Independent dimension-weighting mechanisms for visual selection and stimulus identification. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[5] Dominique Lamy,et al. Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: Does motor response or response feature matter? , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[6] Jonathan W. Peirce,et al. PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[7] Dragan Rangelov,et al. Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[8] V. Maljkovic,et al. Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search , 2005, Vision Research.
[9] Christian N. L. Olivers,et al. Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search , 2006 .
[10] Árni Kristjánsson,et al. Episodic retrieval and feature facilitation in intertrial priming of visual search , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[11] J. Theeuwes. Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] Li Zhaoping,et al. The Primary Visual Cortex Creates a Bottom-up Saliency Map , 2005 .
[13] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Dimension‐specific intertrial facilitation in visual search for pop‐out targets: Evidence for a top‐down modulable visual short‐term memory effect , 2004 .
[14] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[15] J. Theeuwes,et al. Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[16] Dominique Lamy,et al. The role of search difficulty in intertrial feature priming , 2011, Vision Research.
[17] G. Logan. The CODE theory of visual attention: an integration of space-based and object-based attention. , 1996, Psychological review.
[18] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[20] A. Hillstrom. Repetition effects in visual search , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] Michael Zehetleitner,et al. Top-down control of attention: it's gradual, practice-dependent, and hierarchically organized. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] H. Müller,et al. Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[23] Z Li,et al. Contextual influences in V1 as a basis for pop out and asymmetry in visual search. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[24] Dragan Rangelov,et al. The multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis: Theory and empirical support , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[25] M. Bravo,et al. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[26] J. Theeuwes. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.
[28] A. Cohen,et al. Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.
[29] H. Pashler,et al. Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming , 2004, Memory & cognition.
[30] Stefanie I. Becker,et al. The mechanism of priming: episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out? , 2008, Acta psychologica.
[31] Clayton Hickey,et al. Priming resolves perceptual ambiguity in visual search: Evidence from behaviour and electrophysiology , 2010, Vision Research.
[32] H. Müller,et al. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] D. Hubel,et al. Anatomy and physiology of a color system in the primate visual cortex , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[34] M. Goldberg,et al. Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.
[35] D. Hubel,et al. Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.
[36] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection , 2000 .
[37] H. Müller,et al. Stimulus Saliency Modulates Pre-Attentive Processing Speed in Human Visual Cortex , 2011, PloS one.
[38] Christian N L Olivers,et al. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[39] Jonathan Westley Peirce,et al. Neuroinformatics Original Research Article Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using Psychopy , 2022 .
[40] C. Olivers,et al. On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven , 2006 .
[41] M. Eimer,et al. Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[42] David J. Field,et al. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.
[43] H. Müller,et al. The detection of feature singletons defined in two dimensions is based on salience summation, rather than on serial exhaustive or interactive race architectures , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[44] J. Theeuwes. Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[45] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: Separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects , 2010, Vision Research.
[46] H. Müller,et al. Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? , 2006 .
[47] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[48] Dragan Rangelov,et al. Partial repetition costs persist in nonsearch compound tasks: Evidence for multiple-weighting-systems hypothesis , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[49] H. Deubel,et al. Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.
[50] K. Nakayama,et al. Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.
[51] Dominique Lamy,et al. A dual-stage account of inter-trial priming effects , 2010, Vision Research.
[52] Jon Driver,et al. Repetition streaks increase perceptual sensitivity in visual search of brief displays , 2008, Visual cognition.