Face and content validity of a virtual-reality simulator for myringotomy with tube placement

BackgroundMyringotomy with tube insertion can be challenging for junior Otolaryngology residents as it is one of the first microscopic procedures they encounter. The Western myringotomy simulator was developed to allow trainees to practice microscope positioning, myringotomy, and tube placement. This virtual-reality simulator is viewed in stereoscopic 3D, and a haptic device is used to manipulate the digital ear model and surgical tools.ObjectiveTo assess the face and content validity of the Western myringotomy simulator.MethodsThe myringotomy simulator was integrated with new modules to allow speculum placement, manipulation of an operative microscope, and insertion of the ventilation tube through a deformable tympanic membrane. A questionnaire was developed in consultation with instructing surgeons. Fourteen face validity questions focused on the anatomy of the ear, simulation of the operative microscope, appearance and movement of the surgical instruments, deformation and cutting of the eardrum, and myringotomy tube insertion. Six content validity questions focused on training potential on surgical tasks such as speculum placement, microscope positioning, tool navigation, ear anatomy, myringotomy creation and tube insertion. A total of 12 participants from the Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery were recruited for the study. Prior to completing the questionnaire, participants were oriented to the simulator and given unlimited time to practice until they were comfortable with all of its aspects.ResultsResponses to 12 of the 14 questions on face validity were predominantly positive. One issue of concern was with contact modeling related to tube insertion into the eardrum, and the second was with the movement of the blade and forceps. The former could be resolved by using a higher resolution digital model for the eardrum to improve contact localization. The latter could be resolved by using a higher fidelity haptic device. With regard to content validity, 64 % of the responses were positive, 21 % were neutral, and 15 % were negative.ConclusionsThe Western myringotomy simulator appears to have sufficient face and content validity. Further development with automated metrics and skills transference testing is planned.

[1]  S. Peirce,et al.  Construct validity of a simulator for myringotomy with ventilation tube insertion , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[2]  Hanif M Ladak,et al.  Virtual reality myringotomy simulation with real‐time deformation: Development and validity testing , 2012, The Laryngoscope.

[3]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Modification of Commercial Force Feedback Hardware for Needle Insertion Simulation , 2011, MMVR.

[4]  M. Duijvestein,et al.  The Bradford grommet trainer , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[5]  A. Khan,et al.  Medial displacement of grommets: an unwanted sequel of grommet insertion , 2000, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[6]  Mary-Louise Montague,et al.  Human error identification: an analysis of myringotomy and ventilation tube insertion. , 2004, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[7]  O. Burgert,et al.  A topologically faithful, tissue-guided, spatially varying meshing strategy for computing patient-specific head models for endoscopic pituitary surgery simulation , 2006, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[8]  Ara Darzi,et al.  Face and Content Validation of a Virtual Reality Temporal Bone Simulator , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  Gregory J. Wiet,et al.  Virtual Temporal Bone Dissection System: Development and Testing , 2012 .

[10]  Anthony Zeitouni,et al.  The McGill simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery (MSESS): a validation study , 2014, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[11]  A. Woolley,et al.  Major vascular injuries in children undergoing myringotomy for tube placement. , 1999, American journal of otolaryngology.

[12]  E. Harley,et al.  Medial migration of tympanostomy tubes: an overlooked complication. , 2006, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[13]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  S Weghorst,et al.  Validation of the Madigan ESS simulator. , 1998, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[15]  C. Aldren,et al.  Artificial Ear: A Training Tool for Grommet Insertion and Manual Dexterity , 2006, ORL.

[16]  Hervé Delingette,et al.  A Topologically Faithful, Tissue-Guided, Spatially Varying Meshing Strategy for Computing Patient-Specific Head Models for Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery Simulation , 2005, CVBIA.

[17]  Hanif M Ladak,et al.  Development and face validity testing of a three-dimensional myringotomy simulator with haptic feedback. , 2010, Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale.

[18]  T Walker,et al.  The Wigan grommet trainer , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[19]  R. M. Satava,et al.  Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[20]  S. Hamstra,et al.  Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. , 2014, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  Andreas Pommert,et al.  Virtual reality: A new paranasal sinus surgery simulator , 2009, The Laryngoscope.

[22]  M Hayakawa,et al.  Virtual 3-Dimensional Preoperative Planning with the Dextroscope for Excision of a 4th Ventricular Ependymoma , 2007, Minimally invasive neurosurgery : MIN.

[23]  Dan Morris,et al.  Providing metrics and performance feedback in a surgical simulator , 2008, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[24]  Paul Hong,et al.  An anatomically sound surgical simulation model for myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion. , 2014, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[25]  Hanif M. Ladak,et al.  Interactive computer-based simulator for training in blade navigation and targeting in myringotomy , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[26]  Hanif M. Ladak,et al.  Virtual Reality Simulator for Training in Myringotomy with Tube Placement , 2016 .

[27]  A. Scherpbier,et al.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[28]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.