Role of institutional pressures and resources in the adoption of big data analytics powered artificial intelligence, sustainable manufacturing practices and circular economy capabilities

[1]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[2]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[3]  C. Fornell,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics , 1981 .

[4]  S. Hart.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[5]  J. Barney.  The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[6]  C. Oliver.  SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: COMBINING INSTITUTIONAL AND RESOURCE- BASED VIEWS , 1997 .

[7]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory , 1998 .

[8]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism , 1999 .

[9]  J. Barney.  Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view , 2001 .

[10]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Impact of Information Systems Resources and Capabilities on Firm Performance: A Resource-Based Perspective , 2002, International Conference on Interaction Sciences.

[11]  M. Wade,et al.  Review: the resource-based view and information systems research: review, extension, and suggestions for future research , 2004 .

[12]  Kim Hoque,et al.  HRM in the SME sector: valuable employees and coercive networks , 2005 .

[13]  Ramón Valle-Cabrera,et al.  Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories , 2006 .

[14]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The productivity impact of information technology across competitive regimes: The role of industry concentration and dynamism , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[16]  T. Kostova,et al.  Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions , 2008 .

[17]  W. Scott,et al.  Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory , 2008 .

[18]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations , 2008 .

[19]  Fernando César Almada Santos,et al.  Relationships between human resource dimensions and environmental management in companies: proposal of a model , 2008 .

[20]  J. Dhaliwal,et al.  An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management , 2009 .

[21]  J. Paauwe,et al.  Institutional pressures and HRM: developing institutional fit , 2009 .

[22]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[23]  B. Menguc,et al.  Broadening the scope of the resource-based view in marketing: The contingency role of institutional factors , 2009 .

[24]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Where is the opportunity without the customer? An integration of marketing activities, the entrepreneurship process, and institutional theory , 2010 .

[25]  Domingo Ribeiro Soriano,et al.  Management factors affecting the performance of technology firms , 2010 .

[26]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[27]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  Sustainability and supply chain infrastructure development , 2012 .

[28]  Ned Kock,et al.  Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  RFID systems in libraries: An empirical examination of factors affecting system use and user satisfaction , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  S. Fawcett,et al.  Data Science, Predictive Analytics, and Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform Supply Chain Design and Management , 2013 .

[31]  Jin Chen,et al.  E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  K. Lai,et al.  Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices , 2013 .

[33]  José F. Molina-Azorín.  Microfoundations of Strategic Management: Toward Micro–Macro Research in the Resource-Based Theory , 2014 .

[34]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  RFID integrated systems in libraries: extending TAM model for empirically examining the use , 2014, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[35]  Shahriar Akter,et al.  How ‘Big Data’ Can Make Big Impact: Findings from a Systematic Review and a Longitudinal Case Study , 2015 .

[36]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Institutional pressures in security management: Direct and indirect influences on organizational investment in information security control resources , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[37]  N. Kock.  Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach , 2015, Int. J. e Collab..

[38]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[39]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[40]  Yi‐Chun Huang,et al.  Institutional pressures, resources commitment, and returns management , 2016 .

[41]  Johannes Cornelis de Man,et al.  An Industry 4.0 Research Agenda for Sustainable Business Models , 2017 .

[42]  Huixiang Zeng,et al.  Institutional pressures, sustainable supply chain management, and circular economy capability: Empirical evidence from Chinese eco-industrial park firms , 2017 .

[43]  Bengt Lennartson,et al.  An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0 , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[44]  E. Amenta,et al.  Institutional Theory , 2019, Freedom to Be.

[45]  Z. Irani,et al.  Critical analysis of Big Data challenges and analytical methods , 2017 .

[46]  Adriana Roseli Wünsch Takahashi,et al.  Combining institutional theory with resource based theory to understand processes of organizational knowing and dynamic capabilities , 2017 .

[47]  Leanne Chung,et al.  Institutional and Resource‐Based Explanations for Subsidiary Performance , 2017 .

[48]  Gustavo Cattelan Nobre,et al.  Scientific literature analysis on big data and internet of things applications on circular economy: a bibliometric study , 2017, Scientometrics.

[49]  D. Blazquez,et al.  Big Data sources and methods for social and economic analyses , 2017 .

[50]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Content design of advertisement for consumer exposure: Mobile marketing through short messaging service , 2017, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[51]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[52]  Jay Lee,et al.  Industrial Artificial Intelligence for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2018, Manufacturing Letters.

[53]  Morgan Swink,et al.  An Investigation of Visibility and Flexibility as Complements to Supply Chain Analytics: An Organizational Information Processing Theory Perspective , 2018 .

[54]  Morten Brinch,et al.  Practitioners understanding of big data and its applications in supply chain management , 2018 .

[55]  Tsan-Ming Choi,et al.  Big Data Analytics in Operations Management , 2018 .

[56]  Lene Pettersen,et al.  Why Artificial Intelligence Will Not Outsmart Complex Knowledge Work , 2018, Work, Employment and Society.

[57]  Yang Yang,et al.  Strategic response to Industry 4.0: an empirical investigation on the Chinese automotive industry , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[58]  A. Ancarani,et al.  Reshoring and Industry 4.0: How Often Do They Go Together? , 2018, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[59]  M. Tseng,et al.  Circular economy meets industry 4.0: Can big data drive industrial symbiosis? , 2018 .

[60]  Laura Porcu,et al.  Cloud manufacturing as a sustainable process manufacturing route , 2018 .

[61]  Shanyong Wang,et al.  Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Practices: The Moderating Effects of Environmental Commitment and Resource Availability , 2018 .

[62]  L. Li.  China's manufacturing locus in 2025: With a comparison of “Made-in-China 2025” and “Industry 4.0” , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[63]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[64]  H. Kohl,et al.  Industry 4.0 as enabler for a sustainable development: A qualitative assessment of its ecological and social potential , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[65]  E. Yadegaridehkordi,et al.  Influence of big data adoption on manufacturing companies' performance: An integrated DEMATEL-ANFIS approach , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[66]  Cyril R. H. Foropon,et al.  When titans meet – Can industry 4.0 revolutionise the environmentally-sustainable manufacturing wave? The role of critical success factors , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[67]  Fernando E. García-Muiña,et al.  The Paradigms of Industry 4.0 and Circular Economy as Enabling Drivers for the Competitiveness of Businesses and Territories: The Case of an Italian Ceramic Tiles Manufacturing Company , 2018, Social Sciences.

[68]  Rosanna Fornasiero,et al.  Moving towards digitalization: a multiple case study in manufacturing , 2020 .

[69]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data - evolution, challenges and research agenda , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[70]  Manisha Sharma,et al.  Examining the role of trust and quality dimensions in the actual usage of mobile banking services: An empirical investigation , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[71]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Big Data and Predictive Analytics and Manufacturing Performance: Integrating Institutional Theory, Resource‐Based View and Big Data Culture , 2019, British Journal of Management.

[72]  Sergey A. Yablonsky,et al.  Multidimensional Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Innovation , 2019, Technology Innovation Management Review.

[73]  Robert G. Aykroyd,et al.  Recent developments of control charts, identification of big data sources and future trends of current research , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[74]  Mary-Anne Williams,et al.  Avoid being the Turkey: How big data analytics changes the game of strategy in times of ambiguity and uncertainty , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[75]  Benjamin T. Hazen,et al.  Circular economy and big data analytics: A stakeholder perspective , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[76]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: a new era has begun , 2019, Small Business Economics.

[77]  Tim C Kietzmann,et al.  Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in B2B marketing , 2019, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing.

[78]  A. Mohammed Abubakar,et al.  Applying artificial intelligence technique to predict knowledge hiding behavior , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[79]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Circular economy business models and operations management , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[80]  Jon Kepa Gerrikagoitia,et al.  Digital Manufacturing Platforms in the Industry 4.0 from Private and Public Perspectives , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[81]  Andreas M. Kaplan,et al.  A Brief History of Artificial Intelligence: On the Past, Present, and Future of Artificial Intelligence , 2019, California Management Review.

[82]  Z. Allam,et al.  On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities , 2019, Cities.

[83]  Michael Ashley,et al.  When Robots Replace Human Managers: Introducing the Quantifiable Workplace , 2019, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[84]  Faiz Muhammad Khuwaja,et al.  The Intention to Adopt Green IT Products in Pakistan: Driven by the Modified Theory of Consumption Values , 2019, Environments.

[85]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[86]  Implementation of Artificial Intelligence System and Traditional System: A Comparative Study , 2019, Journal of System and Management Sciences.

[87]  G. Antoniou,et al.  Supply chain risk management and artificial intelligence: state of the art and future research directions , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[88]  T. Nam.  Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[89]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  Unlocking the circular economy through new business models based on large-scale data: An integrative framework and research agenda , 2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[90]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics capability in supply chain agility , 2019, Management Decision.

[91]  Álvaro Segura,et al.  Sustainable and flexible industrial human machine interfaces to support adaptable applications in the Industry 4.0 paradigm , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[92]  Jagjit Singh Srai,et al.  Rethinking supply chains in the age of digitalization , 2019, Production Planning & Control.

[93]  Surya Prakash Singh,et al.  Connecting circular economy and industry 4.0 , 2019, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[94]  G. Budzik,et al.  Ecological trends in machining as a key factor in sustainable production – A review , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[95]  Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes,et al.  Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[96]  Mirjana Pejić Bach,et al.  Transformation towards smart factory system: Examining new job profiles and competencies , 2020 .

[97]  Johannes W. Veile,et al.  Lessons learned from Industry 4.0 implementation in the German manufacturing industry , 2019, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

[98]  Yang Liu,et al.  How can smart technologies contribute to sustainable product lifecycle management? , 2020, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[99]  Rohit Nishant,et al.  Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[100]  Helen L. Brown-Liburd,et al.  The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing , 2020, Journal of Business Ethics.

[101]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[102]  Lincoln C. Wood,et al.  Procurement 4.0 and its implications on business process performance in a circular economy , 2020 .

[103]  A. Petrillo,et al.  Geopolymer-based hybrid foams: Lightweight materials from a sustainable production process , 2020 .

[104]  Cheng-kang Gao,et al.  Pathways towards regional circular economy evaluated using material flow analysis and system dynamics , 2020 .

[105]  Stéphane Dauzère-Pérès,et al.  Artificial intelligence in manufacturing and logistics systems: algorithms, applications, and case studies , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[106]  Michela Gallo,et al.  Circular economy approach to reduce water–energy–food nexus , 2020 .

[107]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[108]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  Understanding artificial intelligence adoption in operations management: insights from the review of academic literature and social media discussions , 2020, Annals of Operations Research.

[109]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: A study of manufacturing organisations , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[110]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach , 2020 .

[111]  R. Sawhney,et al.  Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers , 2020, International Journal of Production Economics.

[112]  Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour,et al.  First-mover firms in the transition towards the sharing economy in metallic natural resource-intensive industries: Implications for the circular economy and emerging industry 4.0 technologies , 2020 .

[113]  Nripendra P. Rana,et al.  Perspectives on the future of manufacturing within the Industry 4.0 era , 2020, Production Planning & Control.

[114]  K. Pactwa,et al.  Coal mining waste in Poland in reference to circular economy principles , 2020 .

[115]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS) , 2020 .

[116]  In Lee,et al.  Machine learning for enterprises: Applications, algorithm selection, and challenges , 2020 .

[117]  Paula de Camargo Fiorini,et al.  Digitally-enabled sustainable supply chains in the 21st century: A review and a research agenda. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[118]  L. F. Scavarda,et al.  Interplay between reverse logistics and circular economy: Critical success factors-based taxonomy and framework , 2020 .

[119]  Arno De Caigny,et al.  Leveraging fine-grained transaction data for customer life event predictions , 2020, Decis. Support Syst..

[120]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Role of artificial intelligence in operations environment: a review and bibliometric analysis , 2020, The TQM Journal.

[121]  Thomas Clauss,et al.  Circular economy business models: The state of research and avenues ahead , 2020 .

[122]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[123]  Piero Morseletto.  Targets for a circular economy , 2020 .

[124]  Dorian Selz,et al.  From electronic markets to data driven insights , 2020, Electron. Mark..

[125]  Xicong Zou,et al.  Sustainable production of dry-ultra-precision machining of Ti–6Al–4V alloy using PCD tool under ultrasonic elliptical vibration-assisted cutting , 2020 .

[126]  Yu Guo,et al.  Big data driven jobs remaining time prediction in discrete manufacturing system: a deep learning-based approach , 2020, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[127]  J. Forrest,et al.  Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china's manufacturing sectors , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[128]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework , 2020 .

[129]  Yogesh K. Dwivedi,et al.  A new health care system enabled by machine intelligence: Elderly people's trust or losing self control , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[130]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy , 2019, International Journal of Information Management.

[131]  Uthayasankar Sivarajah,et al.  Role of technological dimensions of green supply chain management practices on firm performance , 2020, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[132]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience , 2019, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[133]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development , 2021 .