Octopus Arm-Inspired Tapered Soft Actuators with Suckers for Improved Grasping.

Octopuses can employ their tapered arms to catch prey of all shapes and sizes due to their dexterity, flexibility, and gripping power. Intrigued by variability in arm taper angle between different octopus species, we explored the utility of designing soft actuators exhibiting a distinctive conical geometry, compared with more traditional cylindrical forms. We find that these octopus-inspired conical-shaped actuators exhibit a wide range of bending curvatures that can be tuned by simply altering their taper angle and they also demonstrate greater flexibility compared with their cylindrical counterparts. The taper angle and bending curvature are inversely related, whereas taper angle and applied bending force are directly related. To further expand the functionality of our soft actuators, we incorporated vacuum-actuated suckers into the actuators for the production of a fully integrated octopus arm-inspired gripper. Notably, our results reveal that because of their enhanced flexibility, these tapered actuators with suckers have better gripping power than their cylindrical-shaped counterparts and require significantly larger forces to be detached from both flat and curved surfaces. Finally, we show that by choosing appropriate taper angles, our tapered actuators with suckers can grip, move, and place a remarkably wide range of objects with flat, nonplanar, smooth, or rough surfaces, as well as retrieve objects through narrow openings. The results from this study not only provide new design insights into the creation of next-generation soft actuators for gripping a wide range of morphologically diverse objects but also contribute to our understanding of the functional significance of arm taper angle variability across octopus species.

[1]  W. Kier,et al.  The Morphology and Mechanics of Octopus Suckers. , 1990, The Biological bulletin.

[2]  Smith Cephalopod sucker design and the physical limits to negative pressure , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  A. Gent A New Constitutive Relation for Rubber , 1996 .

[4]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[5]  B. Hochner,et al.  Control of Octopus Arm Extension by a Peripheral Motor Program , 2001, Science.

[6]  W. Kier,et al.  The Structure and Adhesive Mechanism of Octopus Suckers1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[7]  J. Semmens,et al.  Pulling or drilling, does size or species matter? An experimental study of prey handling in Octopus dierythraeus , 2003 .

[8]  Jefferson Y. Han Low-cost multi-touch sensing through frustrated total internal reflection , 2005, UIST.

[9]  Christopher C. Pagano,et al.  Continuum robot arms inspired by cephalopods , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[11]  W. Kier,et al.  The arrangement and function of octopus arm musculature and connective tissue , 2007, Journal of morphology.

[12]  M. Brojan,et al.  Large deflections of nonlinearly elastic non-prismatic cantilever beams made from materials obeying the generalized Ludwick constitutive law , 2009 .

[13]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  B Mazzolai,et al.  An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[15]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Soft-robotic arm inspired by the octopus: II. From artificial requirements to innovative technological solutions , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[16]  M Giorelli,et al.  A 3D steady-state model of a tendon-driven continuum soft manipulator inspired by the octopus arm , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[17]  B Mazzolai,et al.  Soft robotic arm inspired by the octopus: I. From biological functions to artificial requirements , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[18]  Richard H. C. Bonser,et al.  Development of biomimetic squid-inspired suckers , 2012 .

[19]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[20]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Soft Machines That are Resistant to Puncture and That Self Seal , 2013, Advanced materials.

[21]  Andrea Manica,et al.  Referential gestures in fish collaborative hunting , 2013, Nature Communications.

[22]  L. Beccai,et al.  Octopus Suckers Identification Code (OSIC) , 2013 .

[23]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Magnetic Assembly of Soft Robots with Hard Components , 2013 .

[24]  Kelsey N. Lucas,et al.  Bending rules for animal propulsion , 2014, Nature Communications.

[25]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[26]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[27]  G. Lauder,et al.  Biomimetic shark skin: design, fabrication and hydrodynamic function , 2014, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[28]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  Finite Element Analysis and Design Optimization of a Pneumatically Actuating Silicone Module for Robotic Surgery Applications , 2014 .

[29]  Auke J. Ijspeert,et al.  Biorobotics: Using robots to emulate and investigate agile locomotion , 2014, Science.

[30]  Chakravarthini M. Saaj,et al.  Skins and Sleeves for Soft Robotics: Inspiration from Nature and Architecture , 2015 .

[31]  M Calisti,et al.  Bioinspired locomotion and grasping in water: the soft eight-arm OCTOPUS robot , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[32]  R. Wood,et al.  Jumping on water: Surface tension–dominated jumping of water striders and robotic insects , 2015, Science.

[33]  A Menciassi,et al.  A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[34]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[35]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Dielectric Elastomer Based “Grippers” for Soft Robotics , 2015, Advanced materials.

[36]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[37]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.

[38]  Binyamin Hochner,et al.  Octopus arm movements under constrained conditions: adaptation, modification and plasticity of motor primitives , 2015, The Journal of Experimental Biology.

[39]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous Object Manipulation Using a Soft Planar Grasping Manipulator , 2015, Soft robotics.

[40]  T. Aida,et al.  Thermoresponsive actuation enabled by permittivity switching in an electrostatically anisotropic hydrogel. , 2015, Nature materials.

[41]  R. Caldwell,et al.  Behavior and Body Patterns of the Larger Pacific Striped Octopus , 2015, PloS one.

[42]  M Giorelli,et al.  Learning the inverse kinetics of an octopus-like manipulator in three-dimensional space , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[43]  F Tramacere,et al.  Octopus-like suction cups: from natural to artificial solutions. , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[44]  Wang Tianmiao,et al.  Universal soft pneumatic robotic gripper with variable effective length , 2016, 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC).

[45]  Taeghwan Hyeon,et al.  Cephalopod‐Inspired Miniaturized Suction Cups for Smart Medical Skin , 2016, Advanced healthcare materials.

[46]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[47]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Lessons from Animals and Plants: The Symbiosis of Morphological Computation and Soft Robotics , 2016, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[48]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A novel type of compliant and underactuated robotic hand for dexterous grasping , 2016, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[49]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[50]  D. Floreano,et al.  Versatile Soft Grippers with Intrinsic Electroadhesion Based on Multifunctional Polymer Actuators , 2016, Advanced materials.

[51]  Hyunhyub Ko,et al.  Octopus‐Inspired Smart Adhesive Pads for Transfer Printing of Semiconducting Nanomembranes , 2016, Advanced materials.

[52]  Fionnuala Connolly,et al.  Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Mingjie Liu,et al.  Highly Stretchable, Shape Memory Organohydrogels Using Phase‐Transition Microinclusions , 2017, Advanced materials.

[54]  Matthew A. Robertson,et al.  New soft robots really suck: Vacuum-powered systems empower diverse capabilities , 2017, Science Robotics.

[55]  Youngjin Park,et al.  A wet-tolerant adhesive patch inspired by protuberances in suction cups of octopi , 2017, Nature.

[56]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Bioinspired photocontrollable microstructured transport device , 2017, Science Robotics.

[57]  D J Mooney,et al.  Tough adhesives for diverse wet surfaces , 2017, Science.

[58]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Controllable load sharing for soft adhesive interfaces on three-dimensional surfaces , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Bram Vanderborght,et al.  Self-healing soft pneumatic robots , 2017, Science Robotics.

[60]  Li Wen,et al.  A biorobotic adhesive disc for underwater hitchhiking inspired by the remora suckerfish , 2017, Science Robotics.

[61]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  An origami-inspired, self-locking robotic arm that can be folded flat , 2018, Science Robotics.

[62]  Luoran Shang,et al.  Bioinspired living structural color hydrogels , 2018, Science Robotics.

[63]  Donald Ruffatto,et al.  A Soft Robotic Gripper With Gecko-Inspired Adhesive , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[64]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Shark skin-inspired designs that improve aerodynamic performance , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.