The integration hypothesis of human language evolution and the nature of contemporary languages

How human language arose is a mystery in the evolution of Homo sapiens. Miyagawa et al. (2013) put forward a proposal, which we will call the Integration Hypothesis of human language evolution, that holds that human language is composed of two components, E for expressive, and L for lexical. Each component has an antecedent in nature: E as found, for example, in birdsong, and L in, for example, the alarm calls of monkeys. E and L integrated uniquely in humans to give rise to language. A challenge to the Integration Hypothesis is that while these non-human systems are finite-state in nature, human language is known to require characterization by a non-finite state grammar. Our claim is that E and L, taken separately, are in fact finite-state; when a grammatical process crosses the boundary between E and L, it gives rise to the non-finite state character of human language. We provide empirical evidence for the Integration Hypothesis by showing that certain processes found in contemporary languages that have been characterized as non-finite state in nature can in fact be shown to be finite-state. We also speculate on how human language actually arose in evolution through the lens of the Integration Hypothesis.

[1]  J. Pinel,et al.  Linguistic analogies and behavior: The finite-state behavioral grammar of food-hoarding in hamsters , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  Andrea Moro,et al.  On the similarity between syntax and actions , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  A. Ghazanfar,et al.  Cineradiography of Monkey Lip-Smacking Reveals Putative Precursors of Speech Dynamics , 2012, Current Biology.

[4]  H. Marchand.  The categories and types of present-day English word-formation : a synchronic-diachronic approach , 1960 .

[5]  Leofranc Holford-Strevens.  The Origins of Grammar: Language in the Light of Evolution by James Hurford , 2015 .

[6]  P. Marler.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? , 1970, American scientist.

[7]  F. Pulvermüller.  The syntax of action , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  The Generative Capacity of Word-Formation Components , 2008 .

[9]  J. C. Fentress,et al.  Natural syntax rules control action sequence of rats , 1987, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Ray Jackendoff.  Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language , 2010 .

[11]  R. G. Kent,et al.  Language: Its Nature, Development, and Origin , 1923 .

[12]  Joan Bresnan,et al.  Lexical-functional grammar , 1987 .

[13]  Klaus Zuberbühler,et al.  Language evolution: Semantic combinations in primate calls , 2006, Nature.

[14]  Michal Starke,et al.  Nanosyntax : A short primer to a new approach to language , 2010 .

[15]  P. Pye-Smith.  The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[16]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Faithfulness and reduplicative identity , 1995 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002 .

[18]  David Embick,et al.  Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology , 2010 .

[19]  C. Scharff,et al.  Twitter evolution: converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  J. Mitani.  Gibbon Song Duets and Intergroup Spacing , 1985 .

[21]  Eric Raimy,et al.  The phonology and morphology of reduplication , 2000 .

[22]  R. Berwick,et al.  A Bird’s Eye View of Human Language Evolution , 2012, Front. Evol. Neurosci..

[23]  Andrea Moro,et al.  Response to Pulvermüller: the syntax of actions and other metaphors , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  Linguistic Minimalism: Origins, Concepts, Methods, and Aims , 2006 .

[25]  W. Tecumseh Fitch,et al.  The Evolution of Syntax: An Exaptationist Perspective , 2011, Front. Evol. Neurosci..

[26]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? , 2002, Science.

[28]  M. Benton.  Phylogeny of the major tetrapod groups: Morphological data and divergence dates , 1990, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[29]  Alaa A. Kharbouch,et al.  Three models for the description of language , 1956, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[30]  ROBERT C. BERWICK,et al.  All you Need is Merge : Biology , Computation , and Language from the Bottom-up , 2014 .

[31]  R. Sybesma.  Whether We Tense-Agree Overtly or Not , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[32]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  Continental Patterns of Song Variability in Zonotrichia capensis: Some Possible Ecological Correlates , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[34]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[35]  T. Bergman.  Speech-like vocalized lip-smacking in geladas , 2013, Current Biology.

[36]  Denise Brandão de Oliveira e Britto,et al.  The faculty of language , 2007 .

[37]  E. H. Haimoff.  The organization of song in Müller’s Gibbon (Hylobates muelleri) , 1985, International Journal of Primatology.

[38]  T. Geissmann,et al.  The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs, Hylobates syndactylus , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  Cedric Boeckx,et al.  The biolinguistic enterprise : new perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty , 2011 .

[40]  J. Mitani,et al.  Male Gibbon (Hylobates agilis) Singing Behavior: Natural History, Song Variations and Function , 2010 .

[41]  Thomas Geissmann,et al.  The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch) , 2005 .

[42]  Alan S. Prince,et al.  Prosodic Morphology 1986 , 1996 .

[43]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The Emergence of Hierarchical Structure in Human Language , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[44]  R. Berwick,et al.  Songs to syntax: the linguistics of birdsong , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  C. Darwin.  The descent of man, and Selection in relation to sex, Vol 1. , 1871 .

[46]  Noam Chomsky.  Derivation by phase , 1999 .

[47]  R. Menzel,et al.  The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance , 2005, Nature.

[48]  Suzanne Urbanczyk.  The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology: Reduplication , 2007 .

[49]  Shigeru Miyagawa,et al.  Why Agree ? Why Move ? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages , 2009 .

[50]  P. Marler,et al.  Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. , 1980, Science.

[51]  D. Terence Langendoen,et al.  Finite-State Parsing of Phrase-Structure Languages and the Status of Readjustment Rules in Grammar , 2010 .

[52]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Re Reduplication , 2008 .

[53]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[54]  Josef P. Rauschecker,et al.  Ventral and dorsal streams in the evolution of speech and language , 2011, Front. Evol. Neurosci..

[55]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  A Theory of Syntax: Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[56]  E. H. Haimoff,et al.  Loud Calls of the Gibbon (Hylobates Lar): Repertoire, Organisation and Context , 1984 .

[57]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[58]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , 1993 .

[59]  J. Bresnan.  Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[60]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  Restricting Suffix Combinations In German And English: Closing Suffixes And The Monosuffix Constraint , 2002 .

[61]  J T Marshall,et al.  Gibbons and Their Territorial Songs , 1976, Science.

[62]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.