Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans

Significance Cognitive flexibility is hypothesized to require dynamic integration between brain areas. However, the time-dependent nature and distributed complexity of this integration remains poorly understood. Using recent advances in network science, we examine the functional integration between brain areas during a quintessential task that requires executive function. By linking brain regions (nodes) by their interactions (time-dependent edges), we uncover nontrivial modular structure: groups of brain regions cluster together into densely interconnected structures whose interactions change during task execution. Individuals with greater network reconfiguration in frontal cortices show enhanced memory performance, and score higher on neuropsychological tests challenging cognitive flexibility, suggesting that dynamic network reconfiguration forms a fundamental neurophysiological mechanism for executive function. The brain is an inherently dynamic system, and executive cognition requires dynamically reconfiguring, highly evolving networks of brain regions that interact in complex and transient communication patterns. However, a precise characterization of these reconfiguration processes during cognitive function in humans remains elusive. Here, we use a series of techniques developed in the field of “dynamic network neuroscience” to investigate the dynamics of functional brain networks in 344 healthy subjects during a working-memory challenge (the “n-back” task). In contrast to a control condition, in which dynamic changes in cortical networks were spread evenly across systems, the effortful working-memory condition was characterized by a reconfiguration of frontoparietal and frontotemporal networks. This reconfiguration, which characterizes “network flexibility,” employs transient and heterogeneous connectivity between frontal systems, which we refer to as “integration.” Frontal integration predicted neuropsychological measures requiring working memory and executive cognition, suggesting that dynamic network reconfiguration between frontal systems supports those functions. Our results characterize dynamic reconfiguration of large-scale distributed neural circuits during executive cognition in humans and have implications for understanding impaired cognitive function in disorders affecting connectivity, such as schizophrenia or dementia.

[1]  Michael D. Franzen,et al.  Reliability of alternate forms of the trail making test , 1996 .

[2]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[3]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Andy C. H. Lee,et al.  Dissociating aspects of verbal working memory within the human frontal lobe: Further evidence for a “process-specific” model of lateral frontal organization , 2000, Psychobiology.

[5]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  J B Poline,et al.  Evidence for abnormal cortical functional connectivity during working memory in schizophrenia. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[8]  F. Collette,et al.  Brain imaging of the central executive component of working memory , 2002, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[9]  B. Baars,et al.  How conscious experience and working memory interact , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  A. Baddeley Working memory: looking back and looking forward , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[11]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  N‐back working memory paradigm: A meta‐analysis of normative functional neuroimaging studies , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Stefanie Lis,et al.  Executive function and cognitive subprocesses in first-episode, drug-naive schizophrenia: an analysis of N-back performance. , 2005, The American journal of psychiatry.

[13]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Donald T Stuss,et al.  Frontal lobes and attention: Processes and networks, fractionation and integration , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[15]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  Working memory, attention control, and the N-back task: a question of construct validity. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  D. Linden,et al.  The Working Memory Networks of the Human Brain , 2007, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[17]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  T. Klingberg,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Ramona O Hopkins,et al.  Working Memory and the Organization of Brain Systems , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[21]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Evolvability , 2009, JACM.

[24]  S. Cichon,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of a Genome-Wide Supported Psychosis Variant , 2009, Science.

[25]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[28]  Andreas Daffertshofer,et al.  Generative Models of Cortical Oscillations: Neurobiological Implications of the Kuramoto Model , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.

[30]  J. Palva,et al.  Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Comparing Community Structure to Characteristics in Online Collegiate Social Networks , 2008, SIAM Rev..

[33]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of human brain networks during learning , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Qingyang Li,et al.  Emotional perception: Meta-analyses of face and natural scene processing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[35]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Understanding complexity in the human brain , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  Temporal Networks , 2011, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[37]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[38]  Jens C. Pruessner,et al.  City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans , 2011, Nature.

[39]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Statistical parametric network analysis of functional connectivity dynamics during a working memory task , 2011, NeuroImage.

[40]  Jin Fan,et al.  Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies , 2011, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  A. Zalesky,et al.  Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Wolf Singer,et al.  Gamma-Band Activity in Human Prefrontal Cortex Codes for the Number of Relevant Items Maintained in Working Memory , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Test–retest reliability of evoked BOLD signals from a cognitive–emotive fMRI test battery , 2012, NeuroImage.

[44]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Dynamic network structure of interhemispheric coordination , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  L. Deserno,et al.  Reduced Prefrontal-Parietal Effective Connectivity and Working Memory Deficits in Schizophrenia , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Robust Detection of Dynamic Community Structure in Networks , 2012, Chaos.

[47]  N. Turk-Browne,et al.  Mechanisms for widespread hippocampal involvement in cognition. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[48]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Task-Based Core-Periphery Organization of Human Brain Dynamics , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[49]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Multi-task connectivity reveals flexible hubs for adaptive task control , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity: Promise, issues, and interpretations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[52]  Jonathan D. Power,et al.  Intrinsic and Task-Evoked Network Architectures of the Human Brain , 2014, Neuron.

[53]  Oliver Grimm,et al.  Test–retest reliability of fMRI-based graph theoretical properties during working memory, emotion processing, and resting state , 2014, NeuroImage.

[54]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Reworking the language network , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  L. Pessoa Understanding brain networks and brain organization. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[56]  Jessica R. Cohen,et al.  Quantifying the Reconfiguration of Intrinsic Networks during Working Memory , 2014, PloS one.

[57]  D. Bassett,et al.  Why network neuroscience? Compelling evidence and current frontiers. Comment on "Understanding brain networks and brain organization" by Luiz Pessoa. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[58]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[59]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Learning-induced autonomy of sensorimotor systems , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[60]  Danielle S. Bassett,et al.  Cognitive Network Neuroscience , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.