Trustworthiness of Autonomous Systems

Effective robots and autonomous systems must be trustworthy. This chapter examines models of trustworthiness from a philosophical and empirical perspective to inform the design and adoption of autonomous systems. Trustworthiness is a property of trusted agents or organisations that engenders trust in other agent or organisations. Trust is a complex phenomena defined differently depending on the discipline. This chapter aims to bring different approaches under a single framework for investigation with three sorts of questions: Who or what is trustworthy?–metaphysics. How do we know who or what is trustworthy?–epistemology. What factors influence what or who should we trust?–normativity. A two-component model of trust is used that incorporates competence (skills, reliability and experience) and integrity (motives, honesty and character). It is supposed that human levels of competence yield the highest trust whereas trust is reduced at sub-human and super-human levels. The threshold for trustworthiness of an agent or organisation in a particular context is a function of their relationship with the truster and potential impacts of decisions. Building trustworthy autonomous systems requires obeying the norms of logic, rationality and ethics under pragmatic constraints–even though there is disagreement on these principles by experts. Autonomous systems may need sophisticated social identities including empathy and reputational concerns to build human-like trust relationships. Ultimately transdisciplinary research drawing on metaphysical, epistemological and normative human and machine theories of trust are needed to design trustworthy autonomous systems for adoption.

[1]  Jason Yosinski,et al.  Deep neural networks are easily fooled: High confidence predictions for unrecognizable images , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[2]  Holly A. Yanco,et al.  Analysis of Human‐robot Interaction at the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials , 2015, J. Field Robotics.

[3]  Pamela Hieronymi,et al.  The reasons of trust , 2008 .

[4]  S. Turkle Authenticity in the age of digital companions , 2007 .

[5]  Daniel J. McAllister Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations , 1995 .

[6]  Jean-Marie Henckaerts Bringing the Commentaries on the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols into the twenty-first century , 2012, International Review of the Red Cross.

[7]  Jesse Russell,et al.  The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence , 2021, Bots and Beasts.

[8]  P. Asaro On banning autonomous weapon systems: human rights, automation, and the dehumanization of lethal decision-making , 2012, International Review of the Red Cross.

[9]  N. Goodman Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[10]  Fumio Kanehiro,et al.  Humanoid robot HRP-2 , 2008, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[11]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  The Uncanny Valley [From the Field] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[12]  A. Goldman Epistemology and the Evidential Status of Introspective Reports , 2010 .

[13]  Edward S. Hinchman Telling as Inviting to Trust , 2005 .

[14]  M. Osiel Obeying Orders: Atrocity, Military Discipline and the Law of War , 1999 .

[15]  Care Ethics and Virtue Ethics , 2003, Hypatia.

[16]  Thomas Reid,et al.  An inquiry into the human mind , 1970 .

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Katherine Hawley,et al.  Trust, Distrust and Commitment , 2014 .

[19]  F. Billari,et al.  Generalized Trust and Intelligence in the United States , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  D. North Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Economic performance , 1990 .

[21]  Nili Steinfeld,et al.  "I agree to the terms and conditions": (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye-tracking experiment , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  Mariusz Flasiński,et al.  Symbolic Artificial Intelligence , 2016 .

[23]  Luigi Guiso,et al.  The Right Amount of Trust , 2009 .

[24]  Miomir Vukobratovic,et al.  When Were Active Exoskeletons actually Born? , 2007, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[25]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  A survey on trust management for Internet of Things , 2014, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[26]  Joel R. Sklaroff,et al.  Redundancy Management Technique for Space Shuttle Computers , 1976, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[27]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Mobile, dexterous, social robots for mobile manipulation and human-robot interaction , 2008, SIGGRAPH '08.

[28]  Arnon Keren,et al.  Trust and belief: a preemptive reasons account , 2014, Synthese.

[29]  Selma Sabanović,et al.  Inventing Japan’s ‘robotics culture’: The repeated assembly of science, technology, and culture in social robotics , 2014, Social studies of science.

[30]  Z. Pylyshyn Seeing and Visualizing: It's Not What You Think , 2003 .

[31]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Under a Cloud of Suspicion: Trust, Distrust, and Their Interactive Effect in Interorganizational Contracting , 2012 .

[32]  José Ignacio Uriarte,et al.  Towards an Improvement of Magnetic Compass Accuracy and Adjustment , 2016 .

[33]  Thierry Fraichard,et al.  Guaranteeing motion safety for robots , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[34]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[35]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Designing sociable robots , 2002 .

[36]  Yadong Luo,et al.  Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures , 2002 .

[37]  John Tooby,et al.  Adaptive specializations, social exchange, and the evolution of human intelligence , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  David Hume,et al.  A Treatise of Human Nature. Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning Into Moral Subjects. Edited with an Introd. By D.G.C. Macnabb. , 1972 .

[39]  P. Faulkner On Telling and Trusting , 2007 .

[40]  Jie Wu,et al.  DRBTS: Distributed Reputation-based Beacon Trust System , 2006, 2006 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing.

[41]  Jaime R. Carbonell,et al.  AI in CAI : An artificial intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction , 1970 .

[42]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Probabilistic Reasoning and Decision Making in Sensory-Motor Systems , 2008, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[43]  L. Young,et al.  Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral Judgment , 2013, PloS one.

[44]  Eric Schwitzgebel,et al.  A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences , 2015 .

[45]  Yannick Rumpala Artificial intelligences and political organization: An exploration based on the science fiction work of Iain M. Banks , 2012 .

[46]  Brian L. Connelly,et al.  Competence- and Integrity-Based Trust in Interorganizational Relationships: Which Matters More? , 2018 .

[47]  A. Kozlovic Technophobic Themes In Pre-1990 Computer Films , 2003 .

[48]  John Downer,et al.  When failure is an option: redundancy, reliability and regulation in complex technical systems , 2009 .

[49]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[50]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Can You Trust Your Robot? , 2011 .

[51]  Luigi Alfredo Grieco,et al.  Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[52]  P A Hancock,et al.  Imposing limits on autonomous systems , 2017, Ergonomics.

[53]  Clau Sganzerla,et al.  Disruptive Innovation in Digital Mining , 2016 .

[54]  Guiran Chang,et al.  TRM-IoT: A trust management model based on fuzzy reputation for internet of things , 2011, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Katsu Yamane,et al.  3D printed soft skin for safe human-robot interaction , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[56]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[57]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  ACT-R/E , 2013, HRI 2013.

[58]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[59]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[60]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Does Oxytocin Increase Trust in Humans? A Critical Review of Research , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[61]  Mirko Farina The Evolved Apprentice , 2012 .

[62]  Tristan Perez,et al.  Sweet pepper pose detection and grasping for automated crop harvesting , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[63]  E. Ostrom Collective action and the evolution of social norms , 2000, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[64]  D. Wrong,et al.  The over-socialized conception of man in modern sociology. , 1961, Psychoanalysis and the psychoanalytic review.

[65]  V. McGeer Trust, hope and empowerment , 2008 .

[66]  O. Williamson Calculativeness, Trust, and Economic Organization , 1993, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[67]  Julie A. Shah,et al.  Decision-making authority, team efficiency and human worker satisfaction in mixed human–robot teams , 2015, Auton. Robots.

[68]  Paul Faulkner,et al.  Knowledge on Trust , 2011 .

[69]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Removing the shadow of suspicion: the effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[70]  James L. Szalma,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[71]  Fatemeh Shirmohammadzadeh Maleki,et al.  Making Humanoid Robots More Acceptable Based on the Study of Robot Characters in Animation , 2015, ICRA 2015.

[72]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004 .