Development of a lightweight and adaptable multiple-axis hand prosthesis.

The last few decades have produced significant improvements in the design of upper limb prostheses through the increasing use of technology. However the limited function exhibited by these devices remains rooted in their single degree of freedom format. Commercial myoelectric hand prostheses warrant high grip forces to ensure stable prehension due to a planar pincer movement. Hence precise and conscious effort is required on the part of the user to ensure optimum grip. Consumers have shown dissatisfaction with the status quo due to the excessive weight and poor function of existing artificial hands. Increasing the number of grasping patterns and improving the visual feedback from an object in the hand are cited as key objectives. This paper outlines the development of the six-axis Southampton-Remedi hand prosthesis that addresses these design issues by maintaining stable prehension with minimal grip force. Constraints such as modularity, anthropomorphism, and low weight and power consumption are factors that have been adhered to throughout the design process.

[1]  R. Roeschlein,et al.  Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use , 1989, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  I. D. Swain Adaptive control of a hand prosthesis , 1980 .

[3]  S. Gruber,et al.  Robot hands and the mechanics of manipulation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[4]  G Guo,et al.  Optimal Design of a Six-Bar Linkage with One Degree of Freedom for an Anthropomorphic Three-Jointed Finger Mechanism , 1993, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  E. Chao,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of static forces in the thumb during hand function. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  Peter J. Kyberd Algorithmic control of a multifunction hand prosthesis. , 1990 .

[7]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  A Comparison Of Upper Limb Prostheses Users In Europe , 1999 .

[8]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Powered Limb Prostheses: Their Clinical Significance , 1973 .

[9]  L. M. Myers,et al.  The axes of rotation of the thumb interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints. , 1995, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Robot Hands and the Mechanics of Manipulation , 1985 .

[11]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  Quantifying Impaired Hand Function In The Clinical Environment , 1999 .

[12]  D Moore,et al.  Development of a multifunctional adaptive hand prosthesis. , 1980 .

[13]  Stephen C. Jacobsen,et al.  Design of the Utah/M.I.T. Dextrous Hand , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  R Sörbye,et al.  Myoelectric prosthetic fitting in young children. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  William L. Cleghorn,et al.  Application of quality function deployment in rehabilitation engineering , 1994 .

[16]  Paul H. Chappell,et al.  The development of an advanced multi-axis myo-prosthesis and controller , 1999 .

[17]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  An Intelligent Anthropomorphic Hand, with Automatic Grasp , 1998, Robotica.

[18]  R. Tomovic,et al.  An adaptive artificial hand , 1962 .

[19]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  A Critical Review of Functionality Assessment in Natural and Prosthetic Hands , 1999 .

[20]  P J Kyberd,et al.  The population of users of upper limb prostheses attending the Oxford Limb Fitting Service , 1997, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[21]  J. M. Hunter,et al.  Rehabilitation of the hand : surgery and therapy , 1995 .

[22]  Peter J. Kyberd,et al.  MARCUS: a two degree of freedom hand prosthesis with hierarchical grip control , 1995 .

[23]  C Marincek,et al.  Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  Armando Navarro The Development of a New Concept. , 1980 .