Predicting the multi-modal binding propensity of small molecules: towards an understanding of drug promiscuity.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Keunwan Park | Dongsup Kim | Soyoung Lee | Keunwan Park | Dongsup Kim | Soyoung Lee | Hee-Sung Ahn | Hee-Sung Ahn
[1] A. Hopkins,et al. Navigating chemical space for biology and medicine , 2004, Nature.
[2] T. Hampton,et al. "Promiscuous" anticancer drugs that hit multiple targets may thwart resistance. , 2004, JAMA.
[3] A. Sali,et al. Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project , 1999, Nature Genetics.
[4] C. Arteaga. Molecular therapeutics: is one promiscuous drug against multiple targets better than combinations of molecule-specific drugs? , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
[5] Xi Zhang,et al. Molecular basis for specificity in the druggable kinome : sequence-based analysis , 2007 .
[6] Richard Morphy,et al. The influence of target family and functional activity on the physicochemical properties of pre-clinical compounds. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[7] Richard Morphy,et al. The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[8] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .
[9] L. M. Espinoza-Fonseca,et al. The benefits of the multi-target approach in drug design and discovery. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.
[10] F. Simons. Advances in H1-antihistamines. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] A. Barabasi,et al. Drug—target network , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[12] P. Bork,et al. Metabolites: a helping hand for pathway evolution? , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[13] S. Frantz. Drug discovery: Playing dirty , 2005, Nature.
[14] C. Wermuth,et al. Multitargeted drugs: the end of the "one-target-one-disease" philosophy? , 2004, Drug discovery today.
[15] Richard Morphy,et al. From magic bullets to designed multiple ligands. , 2004, Drug discovery today.
[16] David S. Wishart,et al. DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[17] Lan V. Zhang,et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.
[18] Hongyu Zhao,et al. Pathway analysis using random forests classification and regression , 2006, Bioinform..
[19] David A. Lee,et al. Predicting protein function from sequence and structure , 2007, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[20] Péter Csermely,et al. The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.
[21] A. Debnath,et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) paradigm--Hansch era to new millennium. , 2001, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.
[22] C. Craik,et al. Engineering enzyme specificity. , 1998, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[23] Ziding Zhang,et al. Similarity networks of protein binding sites , 2005, Proteins.
[24] Andreas Bender,et al. Similarity Searching of Chemical Databases Using Atom Environment Descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): Evaluation of Performance , 2004, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[25] Peter Ertl,et al. Natural Product-likeness Score and Its Application for Prioritization of Compound Libraries , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] W Patrick Walters,et al. Prediction of 'drug-likeness'. , 2002, Advanced drug delivery reviews.
[27] A. Barabasi,et al. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[28] Simon K. Mencher,et al. BMC Clinical Pharmacology BioMed Central Debate , 2005 .
[29] T. N. Bhat,et al. The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..
[30] B. Roth,et al. Magic shotguns versus magic bullets: selectively non-selective drugs for mood disorders and schizophrenia , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[31] Tanja Kortemme,et al. Design of Multi-Specificity in Protein Interfaces , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[32] Keunwan Park,et al. Binding similarity network of ligand , 2008, Proteins.
[33] John P. Overington,et al. Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.
[34] Pasch,et al. References and Notes Supporting Online Material Evolution of Hormone-receptor Complexity by Molecular Exploitation , 2022 .
[35] Minoru Kanehisa,et al. The KEGG database. , 2002, Novartis Foundation symposium.
[36] Robert P. Sheridan,et al. Random Forest: A Classification and Regression Tool for Compound Classification and QSAR Modeling , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[37] Jong H. Park,et al. Mapping protein family interactions: intramolecular and intermolecular protein family interaction repertoires in the PDB and yeast. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[38] Michael J. Keiser,et al. Relating protein pharmacology by ligand chemistry , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.
[39] G. V. Paolini,et al. Global mapping of pharmacological space , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.
[40] Adam Godzik,et al. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences , 2006, Bioinform..
[41] B. Shoichet,et al. Identification and prediction of promiscuous aggregating inhibitors among known drugs. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[42] R. Leurs,et al. H1‐antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti‐inflammatory actions and cardiac effects , 2002, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.