Optimal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensor Calibration for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes

The calibration of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices is clinically important due to its role in accurate glucose supervision for diabetic patients. However, the calibration is often performed by finger pricks measurement, which adds patients discomfort while already suffering from diabetes. Therefore, reducing the frequency of finger pricks with undiminished CGM sensor accuracy is essential to improve the patients living condition. In this paper, we aim to propose a fully automated approach for CGM sensor calibration and reduce finger prick frequency. A novel framework is designed and we utilize an unknown input observer to delineate the Blood Glucose (BG)-Interstitial Glucose (IG) relation. We also propose a new cost function with a regularization parameter for sensor parameter estimation. The proposed algorithm is evaluated on the FDA-accepted UVA/Padova T1DM simulator and compared with the original calibration. The meals are designed with various volumes of carbohydrate to simulate the patients’ daily intake. The optimal result among all scenarios using mean absolute relative deviation (MARD) metric is 0.10% for 1 calibration (cal) per day while 3.39% for original calibration on the same frequency. After reducing the finger pricks frequency, the results only increase 0.01% and 0.04% using MARD metric for 1 cal/2 days and 1 cal/4 days respectively.

[1]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Adaptive Calibration Algorithm for Plasma Glucose Estimation in Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2013, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[2]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Real-Time Glucose Estimation Algorithm for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Using Autoregressive Models , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[3]  G. Steil,et al.  Use of Subcutaneous Interstitial Fluid Glucose to Estimate Blood Glucose: Revisiting Delay and Sensor Offset , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[4]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Time Lag of Glucose From Intravascular to Interstitial Compartment in Type 1 Diabetes , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[5]  S. Wild,et al.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[6]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  From Two to One Per Day Calibration of Dexcom G4 Platinum by a Time-Varying Day-Specific Bayesian Prior. , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[7]  Luca Zaccarian,et al.  A novel online recalibration strategy for continuous glucose measurement sensors employing LMI techniques , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[8]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Interstitial Fluid Glucose Is Not Just a Shifted-in-Time but a Distorted Mirror of Blood Glucose: Insight from an In Silico Study , 2016, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  Thomas Peyser,et al.  A new-generation continuous glucose monitoring system: improved accuracy and reliability compared with a previous-generation system. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[10]  Jorge Bondia,et al.  A multiple local models approach to accuracy improvement in continuous glucose monitoring. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[11]  Zeinab Mahmoudi,et al.  A multistep algorithm for processing and calibration of microdialysis continuous glucose monitoring data. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[12]  B.D.O. Anderson,et al.  A new approach to the discretization of continuous-time controllers , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[13]  Alberto Maran,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring in diabetic patients: a multicenter analysis. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[14]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  Enhancing the Accuracy of Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors: A Real-Time Deconvolution-Based Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Online Calibration of Glucose Sensors From the Measured Current by a Time-Varying Calibration Function and Bayesian Priors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Reduction of Blood Glucose Measurements to Calibrate Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors: A Bayesian Multiday Framework , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  B Wayne Bequette,et al.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Real-Time Algorithms for Calibration, Filtering, and Alarms , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[18]  C. Cobelli,et al.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[19]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Modeling Plasma-to-Interstitium Glucose Kinetics from Multitracer Plasma and Microdialysis Data. , 2015, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[20]  Howard Zisser,et al.  New features and performance of a next-generation SEVEN-day continuous glucose monitoring system with short lag time. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  D. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of continuous glucose-monitoring sensors: continuous glucose-error grid analysis illustrated by TheraSense Freestyle Navigator data. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[22]  I M E Wentholt,et al.  How to assess and compare the accuracy of continuous glucose monitors? , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[23]  D. Klonoff The Importance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetes , 2000 .

[24]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  A unified filter for simultaneous input and state estimation of linear discrete-time stochastic systems , 2013, Autom..