Temporal and amplitude generalization in motor learning.

A fundamental feature of human motor control is the ability to vary effortlessly over a substantial range, both the duration and amplitude of our movements. We used a three-dimensional robotic interface, which generated novel velocity dependent forces on the hand, to investigate how adaptation to these altered dynamics experienced only for movements at one temporal rate and amplitude generalizes to movements made at a different rate or amplitude. After subjects had learned to make a single point-to-point movement in a novel velocity-dependent force field, we examined the generalization of this learning to movements of both half the duration or twice the amplitude. Such movements explore a state-space not experienced during learning-any changes in behavior are due to generalization of the learning, the form of which was used to probe the intrinsic constraints on the motor control process. The generalization was assessed by determining the force field in which subjects produced kinematically normal movements. We found substantial generalization of the motor learning to the new movements supporting a nonlocal representation of the control process. Of the fields tested, the form of the generalization was best characterized by linear extrapolation in a state-space representation of the controller. Such an intrinsic constraint on the motor control process can facilitate the scaling of natural movements.

[1]  E. Archer,et al.  Transfer effects on a rotary pursuit task as a function of first-task difficulty. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  E. Archer,et al.  Motor skill transfer as a function of intertask interval and pretransfer task difficulty. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  N. A. Bernshteĭn The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1967 .

[4]  A. N. Tikhonov,et al.  Solutions of ill-posed problems , 1977 .

[5]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[6]  G Hart Perceptual distortion. , 1980, The Canadian nurse.

[7]  A G Barto,et al.  Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction. , 1981, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Hollerbach Computers, brains and the control of movement , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  C. Gallistel The Organization of Action: A New Synthesis , 1982 .

[10]  A P Georgopoulos,et al.  On the relations between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in primate motor cortex , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[12]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[16]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[17]  宇野 洋二,et al.  Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movement : minimum torque-change model , 1988 .

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher , 1992, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Neural network control for a closed-loop System using Feedback-error-learning , 1993, Neural Networks.

[20]  Principles for learning single-joint movements. II. Generalizing a learned behavior. , 1993, Experimental brain research.

[21]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Is the cerebellum a smith predictor? , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[22]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Direct cortical representation of drawing. , 1994, Science.

[23]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Lackner,et al.  Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  S. Scott,et al.  Changes in motor cortex activity during reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm postures. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  M. Kawato,et al.  Internal representations of the motor apparatus: implications from generalization in visuomotor learning. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[29]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Generalization to Local Remappings of the Visuomotor Coordinate Transformation , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  TRAJECTORY FORMATION IN ARM MOVEMENTS: MINIMIZATION PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES , 1996 .

[32]  D. Wolpert Computational approaches to motor control , 1997, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Prism Adaptation of Reaching Movements: Specificity for the Velocity of Reaching , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  S. Scott,et al.  Reaching movements with similar hand paths but different arm orientations. I. Activity of individual cells in motor cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  T. Flash,et al.  Models of Motor Adaptation and Impedance Control in Human Arm Movements , 1997 .

[36]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance and a Perturbation Sensitivity Model for Motor Planning , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning , 1997, Nature.

[38]  S. Jaric,et al.  Principles for learning single-joint movements , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  W. Hines,et al.  A multivariate solution for cyclic data, applied in modelling locomotor forces , 1987, Biological Cybernetics.

[40]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.