Does anal gland scent signal identity in the spotted hyaena?

Recognition requires the existence of distinct cues and the ability to detect and discriminate between these signals. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, we investigated the chemical composition of 143 anal scent gland secretions from 84 individually known spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta, in three clans in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. In total, 252 volatile compounds were detected. Comparison of the chemical composition of individual scent profiles by calculating the Bray–Curtis similarity index and using an analysis of similarities revealed that scent profiles varied significantly between individuals but also changed in composition over time. There was no difference in complexity, in terms of the number of different compounds, between male and female scent or between scent from high- and low-ranking females. Scent profiles of closely related females were as similar as profiles of unrelated females. Although there was no evidence of rank-related changes in profiles across the entire female social hierarchy, the profiles of high-ranking females differed significantly from those of low-ranking females, suggesting the presence of an olfactory badge of status. Behaviourally, adult females responded to scent deposited on vegetation by other females significantly faster and more often, and were more likely to anoint themselves with that scent, as the social rank of the female who had deposited the scent increased. These results suggest that spotted hyaena scent carries both an olfactory badge of status and individually distinct cues that are likely to be useful in the maintenance of a social network within their fission–fusion society.

[1]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyaenas: juvenile rank relations with adult females and immigrant males , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  H. Hofer,et al.  Do Spotted Hyena Scent Marks Code for Clan Membership , 2008 .

[4]  H. Hofer,et al.  Loud calling in a female-dominated mammalian society: II. Behavioural contexts and functions of whooping of spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Robert E. Johnston,et al.  Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrates , 1999, Springer US.

[6]  H. Hofer,et al.  The commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas: how a predator copes with migratory prey. I. Social organization , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  L. Issel-Tarver,et al.  Organization and expression of canine olfactory receptor genes. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  T. Burke,et al.  Female mate-choice drives the evolution of male-biased dispersal in a social mammal , 2007, Nature.

[9]  S. Számadó.  The validity of the handicap principle in discrete action-response games , 1999 .

[10]  R. Seyfarth,et al.  Vocal recognition in free-ranging vervet monkeys , 1980, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  H. Hofer,et al.  Analysis of Volatile Compounds in Scent-Marks of Spotted Hyenas (Crocuta Crocuta) and their Possible Function in Olfactory Communication , 2001 .

[12]  S. Insley,et al.  Mother–Offspring vocal recognition in northern fur seals is mutual but asymmetrical , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  J. Dale,et al.  Signaling Individual Identity versus Quality: A Model and Case Studies with Ruffs, Queleas, and House Finches , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[14]  H. Hofer,et al.  The commuting system of Serengeti spotted hyaenas: how a predator copes with migratory prey. II. Intrusion pressure and commuters' space use , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[16]  R. Johnston,et al.  Attractiveness of scents varies with protein content of the diet in meadow voles , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  A. Mungall,et al.  Characterization of clustered MHC-linked olfactory receptor genes in human and mouse. , 2001, Genome research.

[18]  S. Glickman,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta) , 1990 .

[19]  F. Waal,et al.  Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals , 1993 .

[20]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Sexual coercion in animal societies , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Dramatic variation of the vomeronasal pheromone receptor gene repertoire among five orders of placental and marsupial mammals. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Peter L. Hurd.  Communication in discrete action-response games , 1995 .

[23]  D. Müller-Schwarze,et al.  Chemical Signals in the Beaver , 1999 .

[24]  J. Dale,et al.  Individual recognition: it is good to be different. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  M. Mills.  Kalahari Hyaenas: Comparative Behavioural Ecology of Two Species , 1990 .

[26]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Change in marine communities : an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation , 2001 .

[27]  E. MacDonald,et al.  Chemical Cues Identify Gender and Individuality in Giant Pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[28]  D. Tautz,et al.  Characterization of spotted hyena, Crocuta crocuta microsatellite loci , 2003 .

[29]  E. Keverne,et al.  The vomeronasal organ. , 1999, Science.

[30]  W. Hamilton.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. , 1964, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  S. Insley.  Long-term vocal recognition in the northern fur seal , 2000, Nature.

[32]  J. Blas,et al.  A complex plumage pattern as an honest social signal , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  Heribert Hofer,et al.  Loud calling in a female-dominated mammalian society: I. Structure and composition of whooping bouts of spotted hyaenas, Crocuta crocuta , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  S. Rothstein.  A Model System for Coevolution: Avian Brood Parasitism , 1990 .

[35]  Dietland Müller-Schwarze,et al.  Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 3 , 1983 .

[36]  R A Johnstone,et al.  Coalition formation in animals and the nature of winner and loser effects , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  Aaron P. Wagner,et al.  ml‐relate: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship , 2006 .

[38]  J. Mateo.  Recognition systems and biological organization: The perception component of social recognition , 2004 .

[39]  P. Jouventin,et al.  Individual Odor Recognition in Birds: An Endogenous Olfactory Signature on Petrels’ Feathers? , 2007, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[40]  Francesco Bonadonna,et al.  Partner-Specific Odor Recognition in an Antarctic Seabird , 2004, Science.

[41]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Sexual selection and the handicap principle. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  M. Poddar-Sarkar,et al.  CAN FREE FATTY ACIDS IN THE TIGER PHEROMONE ACT AS AN INDIVIDUAL FINGER PRINT , 1999 .

[43]  Jack W. Bradbury,et al.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1998 .

[44]  S. T. Sakai,et al.  The Spotted Hyena (Crocuta crocuta) as a Model System for Study of the Evolution of Intelligence , 2007 .

[45]  J. A. Clark,et al.  Name that tune: call discrimination and individual recognition in Magellanic penguins , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  H. Hofer,et al.  Behavioral processes and costs of co-existence in female spotted hyenas: a life history perspective , 2003, Evolutionary Ecology.

[47]  G. Hausfater.  Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives , 1984, Current Anthropology.

[48]  A. Tomlinson,et al.  Female marmoset monkeys (Callithrix jacchus) can be identified from the chemical composition of their scent marks. , 2001, Chemical senses.

[49]  V. Olson,et al.  Costly sexual signals: are carotenoids rare, risky or required? , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[50]  Robert M. Seyfarth,et al.  The recognition of social alliances by vervet monkeys , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  Filippo Aureli,et al.  Natural conflict resolution , 2000 .

[52]  R. Godard.  Long-term memory of individual neighbours in a migratory songbird , 1991, Nature.

[53]  J. Hurst.  Individual recognition by scent , 2004 .

[54]  D. Müller-Schwarze,et al.  Anal gland secretion codes for family membership in the beaver , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[55]  H. Hofer,et al.  Male spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta) queue for status in social groups dominated by females , 2001 .

[56]  E. Tibbetts.  Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Gas-Chromatographic Analyses of the Subcaudal Gland Secretion of the European Badger (Meles meles) Part I: Chemical Differences Related to Individual Parameters , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[58]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[59]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Distance‐Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions , 2006, Biometrics.

[60]  H. Hofer,et al.  The erect ‘penis’ is a flag of submission in a female-dominated society: greetings in Serengeti spotted hyenas , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  C. Barnard,et al.  Dominance hierarchies and the evolution of "individual recognition". , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.

[62]  Paul S. Martin,et al.  Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide , 1986 .

[63]  A. Zahavi.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[64]  G. Kerth,et al.  Secretions of the interaural gland contain information about individuality and colony membership in the Bechstein's bat , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[65]  R. Wei,et al.  Anogenital gland secretions code for sex and age in the giant panda, Ailuropoda melanoleuca , 2004 .

[66]  Michael D. Scott,et al.  Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[67]  H. Hofer,et al.  Sexual conflicts in spotted hyenas: male and female mating tactics and their reproductive outcome with respect to age, social status and tenure , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.