Virtual environment technologies

Virtual environments (VEs) provide a means for humans to interact with computers in a natural and intuitive way. Such systems aim to exploit the spatial and perceptual processing skills of humans by presenting them with a real-time, 3D synthetic environment that they can experience from a first-person perspective. VEs afford the opportunity for the user to explore and interact with the synthetic world, leading to a sense of involvement or immersion within the VE. One application of VEs is training, whereby users can rehearse costly or hazardous procedures safely within the VE. From the early days of VEs, the idea of using these emerging technologies to assist surgical training has been promoted, leading to a significant amount of research activity in this area. However, the problems and challenges associated with constructing a compelling and effective surgical simulator are many and, whilst significant progress has been made in recent years, much still remains to be done. This review gives an overview of the component technologies, that make up a generic VE system. Three types of surgical simulator, together with their attributes, are identified and how these map onto current VE technology is explored. Finally, some speculations as to future developments are offered.

[1]  Brian E. Smith,et al.  A943 COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE DURING SIMULATED VENTILATION-RELATED EVENTS , 1997 .

[2]  T Saito,et al.  Virtual reality in surgical education. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[3]  Grigore C. Burdea,et al.  Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality , 1996 .

[4]  D. Ross Jeffery,et al.  CASE: a testbed for modeling, measurement and management , 1992, CACM.

[5]  Bernd Fröhlich,et al.  The two-user Responsive Workbench: support for collaboration through individual views of a shared space , 1997, SIGGRAPH.

[6]  Roy Kalawsky,et al.  The science of virtual reality and virtual environments - a technical, scientific and engineering reference on virtual environments , 1993 .

[7]  Koji Ikuta,et al.  Virtual Endoscope System with Force Sensation , 1998, MICCAI.

[8]  Sharon A. Stansfield,et al.  MediSim: a prototype VR system for training medical first responders , 1997, Proceedings. IEEE 1998 Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (Cat. No.98CB36180).

[9]  John Vince,et al.  Essential Virtual Reality fast , 1998 .

[10]  Gerald A. Higgins,et al.  New Simulation Technologies for Surgical Training and Certification: Current Status and Future Projections , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[11]  Heinrich Hertz,et al.  On the differences between localization and lateralization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  L Serra,et al.  An interface for precise and comfortable 3D work with volumetric medical datasets. , 1999, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[13]  John C. Hart,et al.  The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment , 1992, CACM.

[14]  A. Gallagher,et al.  Virtual Reality Training in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Assessment of Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer Virtual Reality (MIST VR) , 1999, Endoscopy.

[15]  James H. Martin,et al.  Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition , 2000 .

[16]  Christian Laugier,et al.  Modeling the Dynamics of a Human Liver for a Minimally Invasive Surgery Simulator , 1999, MICCAI.

[17]  B Fröhlich,et al.  The responsive workbench: a virtual working environment for physicians. , 1995, Computers in biology and medicine.

[18]  John Vince Essential Virtual Reality Fast: How to Understand the Techniques and Potential of Virtual Reality , 1998 .

[19]  Lindsay W. MacDonald,et al.  Display Systems: Design and Applications , 1999 .

[20]  R. V. O'Toole,et al.  Assessing Skill and Learning in Surgeons and Medical Students Using a Force Feedback Surgical Simulator , 1998, MICCAI.