Atomic Structure-Free Representation of Active Motifs for Expedited Catalyst Discovery

To discover new catalysts using density functional theory (DFT) calculations, binding energies of reaction intermediates are considered as descriptors to predict catalytic activities. Recently, machine learning methods have been developed to reduce the number of computationally intensive DFT calculations for a high-throughput screening. These methods require several steps such as bulk structure optimization, surface structure modeling, and active site identification, which could be time-consuming as the number of new candidate materials increases. To bypass these processes, in this work, we report an atomic structure-free representation of active motifs to predict binding energies. We identify binding site atoms and their nearest neighboring atoms positioned in the same layer and the sublayer, and their atomic properties are collected to construct fingerprints. Our method enabled a quicker training (200-400 s using CPU) compared to the previous deep-learning models and predicted CO and H binding energies with mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.120 and 0.105 eV, respectively. Our method is also capable of creating all possible active motifs without any DFT calculations and predicting their binding energies using the trained model. The predicted binding energy distributions can suggest promising candidates to accelerate catalyst discovery.

[1]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[2]  Jingguang G. Chen,et al.  Trends in the catalytic reduction of CO2 by hydrogen over supported monometallic and bimetallic catalysts , 2013 .

[3]  Amaha Kahsay,et al.  Copper and Copper‐Based Bimetallic Catalysts for Carbon Dioxide Electroreduction , 2018, Advanced Materials Interfaces.

[4]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Hydrogen evolution over bimetallic systems: understanding the trends. , 2006, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[5]  Aini Palizhati,et al.  Dynamic Workflows for Routine Materials Discovery in Surface Science , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  Andrew A. Peterson,et al.  How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels , 2010 .

[7]  Luke E K Achenie,et al.  Machine-Learning-Augmented Chemisorption Model for CO2 Electroreduction Catalyst Screening. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[8]  P. Shen,et al.  One-pot synthesized boron-doped RhFe alloy with enhanced catalytic performance for hydrogen evolution reaction , 2018, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental.

[9]  A. Vojvodić,et al.  Electronic Structure Effects in Transition Metal Surface Chemistry , 2014, Topics in Catalysis.

[10]  Thomas Bligaard,et al.  The Brønsted–Evans–Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis , 2004 .

[11]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Understanding Catalytic Activity Trends in the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. , 2018, Chemical reviews.

[12]  S. Sotiropoulos,et al.  Hydrogen evolution at Ir-Ni bimetallic deposits prepared by galvanic replacement , 2018 .

[13]  Zachary W. Ulissi,et al.  Practical Deep-Learning Representation for Fast Heterogeneous Catalyst Screening. , 2020, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[14]  Junhua Hu,et al.  Pseudo-copper Ni-Zn alloy catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to C2 products , 2021, Frontiers of Physics.

[15]  Thomas Bligaard,et al.  Density functional theory in surface chemistry and catalysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  G. Henkelman,et al.  Improved tangent estimate in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points , 2000 .

[17]  Bryan T. Yonemoto,et al.  Highly porous non-precious bimetallic electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution , 2015, Nature Communications.

[18]  Lei Jin,et al.  Hierarchically porous Cu/Zn bimetallic catalysts for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to liquid C2 products , 2020 .

[19]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Universal transition state scaling relations for (de)hydrogenation over transition metals. , 2011, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[20]  Futoshi Matsumoto,et al.  Preparation of Various Pd-Based Alloys for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Reaction—Selectivity Depending on Secondary Elements , 2020 .

[21]  G. Henkelman,et al.  A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths , 2000 .

[22]  H. Xin,et al.  Ag-Sn Bimetallic Catalyst with a Core-Shell Structure for CO2 Reduction. , 2017, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[23]  S. Kawi,et al.  A Review on Bimetallic Nickel-Based Catalysts for CO2 Reforming of Methane. , 2017, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[24]  John Kitchin,et al.  Universality in Oxygen Evolution Electrocatalysis on Oxide Surfaces , 2011 .

[25]  K. Takanabe,et al.  Titania-supported cobalt and nickel bimetallic catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane , 2005 .

[26]  Seoin Back,et al.  Convolutional Neural Network of Atomic Surface structures to Predict Binding Energies For High-throughput Screening of Catalysts. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[27]  Luke E. K. Achenie,et al.  An Adaptive Machine Learning Strategy for Accelerating Discovery of Perovskite Electrocatalysts , 2020 .

[28]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[29]  Zachary W. Ulissi,et al.  Active learning across intermetallics to guide discovery of electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction and H2 evolution , 2018, Nature Catalysis.

[30]  Philippe Sautet,et al.  Finding optimal surface sites on heterogeneous catalysts by counting nearest neighbors , 2015, Science.

[31]  Anubhav Jain,et al.  Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis , 2012 .

[32]  Kristin A. Persson,et al.  Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation , 2013 .

[33]  Yushan Yan,et al.  Perspective—Towards Establishing Apparent Hydrogen Binding Energy as the Descriptor for Hydrogen Oxidation/Evolution Reactions , 2018 .

[34]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[35]  Efficient Discovery of Active, Selective, and Stable Catalysts for Electrochemical H2O2 Synthesis through Active Motif Screening , 2021 .

[36]  Jens K. Nørskov,et al.  Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces , 1995 .

[37]  M. Kim,et al.  Boosted Electron-Transfer Kinetics of Hydrogen Evolution Reaction at Bimetallic RhCo Alloy Nanotubes in Acidic Solution. , 2019, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[38]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Using scaling relations to understand trends in the catalytic activity of transition metals , 2008, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[39]  Jeremy T. Feaster,et al.  Understanding Selectivity for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid and Carbon Monoxide on Metal Electrodes , 2017 .

[40]  Haozhi Wang,et al.  Mechanistic Insight into C–C Coupling over Fe–Cu Bimetallic Catalysts in CO2 Hydrogenation , 2017 .

[41]  W. Shafer,et al.  Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide over Co–Fe Bimetallic Catalysts , 2016 .

[42]  A. Bocarsly,et al.  Ni–Al Films on Glassy Carbon Electrodes Generate an Array of Oxygenated Organics from CO2 , 2017 .

[43]  Muratahan Aykol,et al.  The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies , 2015 .

[44]  B S Clausen,et al.  Catalyst design by interpolation in the periodic table: bimetallic ammonia synthesis catalysts. , 2001, Journal of the American Chemical Society.