Freedom of movement and the stability of its unfolding in free exploration of mice

Exploration is a central component of human and animal behavior that has been studied in rodents for almost a century. The measures used by neuroscientists to characterize full-blown exploration are limited in exposing the dynamics of the exploratory process, leaving the morphogenesis of its structure and meaning hidden. By unfettering exploration from constraints imposed by hunger, thirst, coercion, and the confines of small cage and short session, using advanced computational tools, we reveal its meaning in the operational world of the mouse. Exploration consists of reiterated roundtrips of increasing amplitude and freedom, involving an increase in the number of independent dimensions along which the mouse moves (macro degrees of freedom). This measurable gradient can serve as a standard reference scale for the developmental dynamics of some aspects of the mouse's emotional-cognitive state and for the study of the interface between behavior and the neurophysiologic and genetic processes mediating it.

[1]  Ilan Golani,et al.  SEE: a tool for the visualization and analysis of rodent exploratory behavior , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[2]  David Marr,et al.  VISION A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information , 2009 .

[3]  D. Eilam,et al.  The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in the house rat (Rattus rattus): the mobility gradient. , 1988, Developmental psychobiology.

[4]  J. Crabbe,et al.  Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. , 1999, Science.

[5]  C. S. Hall,et al.  Emotional behavior in the rat. I. Defecation and urination as measures of individual differences in emotionality. , 1934 .

[6]  P. Teitelbaum,et al.  The morphogenesis of stereotyped behavior induced by the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine in the laboratory rat , 1985, Neuroscience.

[7]  H. Barlow.  Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[8]  W. Pitts,et al.  What the Frog's Eye Tells the Frog's Brain , 1959, Proceedings of the IRE.

[9]  Jonathan Flint,et al.  QTL analysis identifies multiple behavioral dimensions in ethological tests of anxiety in laboratory mice , 2001, Current Biology.

[10]  B L McNaughton,et al.  Dynamics of the hippocampal ensemble code for space. , 1993, Science.

[11]  M. Moser,et al.  Representation of Geometric Borders in the Entorhinal Cortex , 2008, Science.

[12]  Marc Cigrang,et al.  Does neophobia necessarily imply fear or anxiety? , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[13]  R N Walsh,et al.  The Open-Field Test: a critical review. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  R Hassler,et al.  Brain mechanisms of intention and attention with introductory remarks on other volitional processes. , 1980, Progress in brain research.

[15]  V. Bolivar,et al.  List of transgenic and knockout mice: behavioral profiles , 2000, Mammalian Genome.

[16]  C. Belzung,et al.  Link between emotional memory and anxiety states: A study by principal component analysis , 1995, Physiology & Behavior.

[17]  Stephanie Schäfer,et al.  What's Wrong With My Mouse?, J.N. Crawley. John Wiley and Sons Inc. (2000), Price: €92.00, ISBN: 0-471-31639-3 , 2007 .

[18]  David S. Olton,et al.  Spatial memory and radial arm maze performance of rats , 1977 .

[19]  Anat Sakov,et al.  The dynamics of spatial behavior: how can robust smoothing techniques help? , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[20]  Ilan Golani,et al.  Superiority and Inferiority: a Morphological Analysis of Free and Stimulus Bound Behaviour in Honey Badger (Mellivora capensis) Interactions , 2010 .

[21]  Rebecca D Burwell,et al.  Corticohippocampal Contributions to Spatial and Contextual Learning , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  D. Treit,et al.  Thigmotaxis as a test for anxiolytic activity in rats , 1988, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[23]  Anat Sakov,et al.  New replicable anxiety-related measures of wall vs center behavior of mice in the open field. , 2004, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  D. Hebb.  Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). , 1955, Psychological review.

[25]  M. Low,et al.  Dopamine D4 Receptor-Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Reduced Exploration of Novel Stimuli , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  David Eilam,et al.  D2-agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements , 1989, Brain Research.

[27]  Anat Sakov,et al.  Genotype-environment interactions in mouse behavior: a way out of the problem. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Frauke Ohl,et al.  Behavioural screening in mutagenised mice--in search for novel animal models of psychiatric disorders. , 2003, European journal of pharmacology.

[29]  M. J. Renner.  Neglected aspects of exploratory and investigatory behavior , 1990, Psychobiology.

[30]  R. Hughes,et al.  Intrinsic exploration in animals: motives and measurement , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[31]  D. Murphy,et al.  Analyzing grooming microstructure in neurobehavioral experiments , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[32]  J. Archer.  Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review. , 1973, Animal behaviour.

[33]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  W. I. Welker,et al.  “Free” versus “Forced” Exploration of a Novel Situation by Rats , 1957 .

[35]  Reut Avni,et al.  Exploration and navigation in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): global calibration as a primer of spatial representation , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[37]  L P Noldus,et al.  EthoVision: A versatile video tracking system for automation of behavioral experiments , 2001, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[38]  David Eilam,et al.  Stopping behavior: constraints on exploration in rats (Rattus norvegicus) , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  G. Griebel,et al.  The free‐exploratory paradigm: an effective method for measuring neophobic behaviour in mice and testing potential neophobia‐reducing drugs , 1993, Behavioural pharmacology.

[40]  R. Selander,et al.  Mice Selectively Bred for Open-Field Thigmotaxis: Life Span and Stability of the Selection Trait , 2005, The Journal of general psychology.

[41]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Motivational problems raised by exploratory and epistemic behavior. , 1962 .

[42]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Estimating wall guidance and attraction in mouse free locomotor behavior , 2007, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[43]  Douglas Wahlsten,et al.  Behavioural testing of standard inbred and 5HT1B knockout mice: implications of absent corpus callosum , 2001, Behavioural Brain Research.

[44]  M. Chance,et al.  Attention Structure as the Basis of Primate Rank Orders , 1967 .

[45]  H. Luhmann,et al.  Contralateral increase in thigmotactic scanning following unilateral barrel-cortex lesion in mice , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[46]  I. Golani.  A mobility gradient in the organization of vertebrate movement: The perception of movement through symbolic language , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  J. Costentin,et al.  Thigmotaxis as an index of anxiety in mice. Influence of dopaminergic transmissions , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[48]  A. Seitz.  Die Paarbildung bei einigen Cichliden , 1940 .

[49]  Yoav Benjamini,et al.  Mouse Cognition-Related Behavior in the Open-Field: Emergence of Places of Attraction , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..