Robust recognition of physical team behaviors using spatio-temporal models

This paper presents a framework for robustly recognizing physical team behaviors by exploiting spatio-temporal patterns. Agent team behaviors in athletic and military domains typically exhibit an observable structure characterized by the relative positions of teammates and external landmarks, such as a team of soldiers ambushing an opponent or a soccer player moving to receive a pass. We demonstrate how complex team relationships that are not easily expressed by region-based heuristics can be modeled from data and domain knowledge in a way that is robust to noise and spatial variation. To represent team behaviors in our domain of MOUT (Military Operations in Urban Terrain) planning, we employ two classes of spatial models: 1) team templates that encode static relationships between team members and external landmarks; and 2) spatially-invariant Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to represent evolving agent team configurations over time. These two classes of models can be combined to improve recognition accuracy, particularly for behaviors that appear similar in static snapshots. We evaluate our modeling techniques on large urban maps and position traces of two-person human teams performing MOUT behaviors in a customized version of Unreal Tournament (a commercially available first-person shooter game).

[1]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[2]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Bayes net toolbox for Matlab , 1999 .

[3]  Michael J. McCloskey,et al.  Decision-Centered MOUT Training for Small Unit Leaders , 2001 .

[4]  Gita Sukthankar Activity Recognition for Physically-Embodied Agent Teams , 2005 .

[5]  Gang Xu,et al.  Epipolar Geometry in Stereo, Motion and Object Recognition , 1996, Computational Imaging and Vision.

[6]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[7]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[8]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  Recognizing Probabilistic Opponent Movement Models , 2001, RoboCup.

[9]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  On Behavior Classification in Adversarial Environments , 2000, DARS.

[10]  Bradley J. Best,et al.  Spatial Plans , Communication , and Teamwork in Synthetic MOUT Agents , 2003 .

[11]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Robust Agent Teams via Socially-Attentive Monitoring , 2000, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[12]  Suchi Saria,et al.  Probabilistic Plan Recognition in Multiagent Systems , 2004, ICAPS.

[13]  Stanislav Kovacic,et al.  Trajectory Based Assessment of Coordinated Human Activity , 2003, ICVS.

[14]  John E. Laird,et al.  EXAMPLE-DRIVEN DIAGRAMMATIC TOOLS FOR RAPID KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION , 2003 .

[15]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[16]  Aaron F. Bobick,et al.  A Framework for Recognizing Multi-Agent Action from Visual Evidence , 1999, AAAI/IAAI.

[17]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[18]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[19]  Manuela M. Veloso,et al.  GameBots: a flexible test bed for multiagent team research , 2002, CACM.

[20]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Tracking Dynamic Team Activity , 1996, AAAI/IAAI, Vol. 1.