Functional decoupling of BOLD and gamma‐band amplitudes in human primary visual cortex

Although functional magnetic resonance imaging is an important tool for measuring brain activity, the hemodynamic blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) response is only an indirect measure of neuronal activity. Converging evidence obtained from simultaneous recording of hemodynamic and electrical measures suggest that the best correlate of the BOLD response in primary visual cortex is gamma‐band oscillations (∼40 Hz). Here, we examined the coupling between BOLD and gamma‐band amplitudes measured with magntoencephalography (MEG) in human primary visual cortex in 10 participants. In Experiment A, participants were exposed to grating stimuli at two contrast levels and two spatial frequencies and in Experiment B square and sine wave stimuli at two spatial frequencies. The amplitudes of both gamma‐band oscillations and BOLD showed tuning with stimulus contrast and stimulus type; however, gamma‐band oscillations showed a 300% increase across two spatial frequencies, whereas BOLD exhibited no change. This functional decoupling demonstrates that increased amplitude of gamma‐band oscillations as measured with MEG is not sufficient to drive the subsequent BOLD response. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  J. Fermaglich.  Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[2]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  W. Singer,et al.  Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties , 1989, Nature.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  K D Singh,et al.  Evaluation of MRI-MEG/EEG co-registration strategies using Monte Carlo simulation. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  R M Leahy,et al.  A sensor-weighted overlapping-sphere head model and exhaustive head model comparison for MEG. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Spatiotemporal Frequency and Direction Sensitivities of Human Visual Areas Measured Using fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[12]  J. Vrba,et al.  Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. , 2001, Methods.

[13]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[14]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Fast robust automated brain extraction , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[16]  F. Varela,et al.  Neuromagnetic imaging of cortical oscillations accompanying tactile stimulation. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  General multilevel linear modeling for group analysis in FMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Consistent and precise localization of brain activity in human primary visual cortex by MEG and fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[19]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Group imaging of task-related changes in cortical synchronisation using nonparametric permutation testing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[20]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  Induced visual illusions and gamma oscillations in human primary visual cortex , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Multilevel linear modelling for FMRI group analysis using Bayesian inference , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  P. Nunez,et al.  On the Relationship of Synaptic Activity to Macroscopic Measurements: Does Co-Registration of EEG with fMRI Make Sense? , 2004, Brain Topography.

[23]  P. König,et al.  A comparison of hemodynamic and neural responses in cat visual cortex using complex stimuli. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  A new approach to neuroimaging with magnetoencephalography , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  The missing link: analogous human and primate cortical gamma oscillations , 2005, NeuroImage.

[26]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  GLM-beamformer method demonstrates stationary field, alpha ERD and gamma ERS co-localisation with fMRI BOLD response in visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  W. Singer,et al.  Hemodynamic Signals Correlate Tightly with Synchronized Gamma Oscillations , 2005, Science.

[28]  David G. Norris,et al.  Combining EEG and fMRI to investigate the post-movement beta rebound , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  I. Fried,et al.  Coupling between Neuronal Firing Rate, Gamma LFP, and BOLD fMRI Is Related to Interneuronal Correlations , 2007, Current Biology.

[30]  F. Carver,et al.  Complex relationship between BOLD signal and synchronization/desynchronization of human brain MEG oscillations , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[31]  Krish D. Singh,et al.  Spatiotemporal frequency tuning of BOLD and gamma band MEG responses compared in primary visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[32]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.