Rationality and Use of Information in Policy Decisions

In the field of knowledge acquisition, dissemination, and utilization/impact, few studies have examined the appropriateness of rational actor theories as a theoretical framework. Rather, the rational actor perspective has been simply taken for granted as a relevant analytical tool for explaining the use of information in policymaking. This article singles out one major set of assumptions imbedded in rational actor theories, those dealing with information acquisition and processing in individual decisionmaking, and empirically examines to what extent the assumptions are realistic. It then puts forward an organizational interest and a communications perspective as alternative explanations for information processing in individual and organizational decisionmaking. The findings of this article show that decisionmakers' behavior does not conform to the assumptions put forward by the rational actor theorists. Instead, the organizational interest perspective is far more promising in accounting for the actual behavior of individuals in processing information in making policy decisions.

[1]  J. March,et al.  Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. , 1981 .

[2]  D. Nachmias.  THE ROLE OF EVALUATION IN PUBLIC POLICY , 1980 .

[3]  John H. Aldrich.  Rational Choice and Turnout , 1993 .

[4]  Robert F. Rich,et al.  Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Utilization , 1991 .

[5]  William N. Dunn,et al.  The Two-Communities Metaphor and Models of Knowledge Use , 1980 .

[6]  C. Nelson,et al.  The Utilization of Social Science Information by Policymakers , 1987 .

[7]  M. van de Vall,et al.  External vs. Internal Social Policy Researchers , 1981 .

[8]  Michael H. Harris,et al.  : In Defense of American Liberties: A History of the Aclu , 1991 .

[9]  Randall L. Calvert,et al.  The Value of Biased Information: A Rational Choice Model of Political Advice , 1985, The Journal of Politics.

[10]  Robert F. Rich,et al.  Explaining use of information in public policymaking , 1996 .

[11]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  ATTITUDE MEASURES IN EVALUATION RESEARCH: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1986 .

[12]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Elections with limited information: A fulfilled expectations model using contemporaneous poll and endorsement data as information sources , 1985 .

[13]  V. Sauter,et al.  Approaches to the Study of Information Utilization in Public Agencies , 1984 .

[14]  Michael Huberman,et al.  Steps Toward an Integrated Model of Research Utilization , 1987 .

[15]  William E. Pollard,et al.  Decision Making and the Use of Evaluation Research , 1987 .

[16]  C. Oh.  Explaining the Impact of Information on Problem Definition: An Integrated Model , 1998 .

[17]  Terry M. Moe,et al.  On the Scientific Status of Rational Models , 1979 .

[18]  Matthias Wingens,et al.  Toward a General Utilization Theory , 1990 .

[19]  M. J. Quadrel,et al.  Information Selection in the House of Representatives , 1989 .

[20]  Nathan Caplan,et al.  The Two-Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization , 1979 .

[21]  Cheol H. Oh,et al.  Information Searching in Governmental Bureaucracies: An Integrated Model , 1996 .

[22]  P. Biernacki,et al.  Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques of Chain Referral Sampling , 1981 .