Object-Centered Shifts of Receptive Field Positions in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex

Stimuli that project the same retinal visual angle can appear to occupy very different proportions of the visual field if they are perceived to be at different distances [1-8]. Previous research shows that perceived angular size alters the spatial distribution of activity in early retinotopic visual cortex [7, 9-11]. For example, a sphere superimposed on the far end of a corridor scene appears to occupy a larger visual angle and activates a larger region of primary visual cortex (V1) compared with the same sphere superimposed on the near end of the corridor [7]. These previous results, however, were obtained from human subjects using psychophysics and fMRI, a fact that fundamentally limits our understanding of the underlying neuronal mechanisms. Here, we present an animal model that allows for a finer examination of size perception at the level of single neurons. We first show that macaque monkeys perceive a size-distance illusion similarly to humans. Then, using extracellular recordings, we test the specific hypothesis [12] that neurons in V1 shift the position of their receptive fields (RFs) in response to complex monocular depth cues. Consistent with this hypothesis, we found that when ring-shaped stimuli appeared at the back of the corridor, RFs of V1 neurons shifted toward the center of the rings. When the same stimuli appeared at the front of the corridor, RFs shifted outward. Thus, our results show for the first time that V1 RFs can shift, potentially serving as the neural basis for the perception of angular size.

[1]  R. Reid,et al.  Rules of Connectivity between Geniculate Cells and Simple Cells in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  D. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Visual Physiology: Perceived Size Looms Large , 2006, Current Biology.

[3]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Comparison of Spatial Summation Properties of Neurons in Macaque V1 and V2 , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  D. Ferster,et al.  Strength and Orientation Tuning of the Thalamic Input to Simple Cells Revealed by Electrically Evoked Cortical Suppression , 1998, Neuron.

[6]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  An illusion predicted by V1 population activity implicates cortical topography in shape perception , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  R. B. Joynson The Problem of Size and Distance , 1949 .

[10]  A. S. Gilinsky,et al.  The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  D. McCready On size, distance, and visual angle perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Alfred H. Holway,et al.  Determinants of Apparent Visual Size with Distance Variant , 1941 .

[13]  R. Reid,et al.  The processing and encoding of information in the visual cortex , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[14]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[16]  D. Kersten,et al.  The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Bullier,et al.  Feedforward and feedback connections between areas V1 and V2 of the monkey have similar rapid conduction velocities. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Ray Hyman,et al.  Attitude and Distance-Estimation as Variables in Size-Matching , 1959 .

[19]  R. Shapley,et al.  Visual spatial characterization of macaque V1 neurons. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  D. Kersten,et al.  Attention-Dependent Representation of a Size Illusion in Human V1 , 2008, Current Biology.

[21]  J M Foley,et al.  The size-distance relation and intrinsic geometry of visual space: implications for processing. , 1972, Vision research.

[22]  D. Samuel Schwarzkopf,et al.  The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  J. Lund,et al.  Anatomical substrates for functional columns in macaque monkey primary visual cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  D. Ferster,et al.  Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex , 1996, Nature.

[25]  H. Ono,et al.  Distal and proximal size under reduced and non-reduced viewing conditions. , 1966, The American journal of psychology.

[26]  E. J. Tehovnik,et al.  Eye Movements Modulate Visual Receptive Fields of V4 Neurons , 2001, Neuron.

[27]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Retinotopic activity in V1 reflects the perceived and not the retinal size of an afterimage , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  G Westheimer,et al.  Dynamics of spatial summation in primary visual cortex of alert monkeys. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  R. Reid,et al.  Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[30]  M. Morrone,et al.  Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent Activation of the Primary Visual Cortex Predicts Size Adaptation Illusion , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[32]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.