Self-Organizing Map for Fingerprinting-Based Cooperative Localization in Dynamic Indoor Environments

Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) fingerprinting methods based on 802.11 signal strength are becoming increasingly the dominating indoor positioning techniques, due to their independence from radio propagation models and cost-effectiveness in terms of hardware and deployment requirements. However, frequent environmental changes cause inconsistency between the fingerprints stored in the radio map and the current radio behavior, thus jeopardizing their accuracy. Re-calibration of the area for updating the radio map incurs considerable amount of time and manual effort. In this paper, we aim to overcome this limitation by adapting to the new radio characteristics through user cooperation and thus eliminating the need of re-calibration. To that end, we propose a cooperative learning algorithm, whereby users exchange their real-time signal measurements in order to refine their estimated locations. The refinement process relies on the neural network structure of self-organizing map (SOM) which is of special interest for localization due to the key property of its neurons in self-organizing in geographic structures based on their similarity to a high-dimensional input data. In our solution, each user is regarded as a neuron of its local SOM network and runs in distributed fashion a modified version of SOM learning algorithm by considering its signal relationship with its neighboring users. Performance evaluation results demonstrate accuracy improvement over both the baseline deterministic and probabilistic fingerprinting approaches, while keeping the communication and computational overheads low.

[1]  G. Giorgetti,et al.  Wireless Localization Using Self-Organizing Maps , 2007, 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[2]  Chin-Tau A. Lea,et al.  Received Signal Strength-Based Wireless Localization via Semidefinite Programming: Noncooperative and Cooperative Schemes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  A. S. Krishnakumar,et al.  Bayesian indoor positioning systems , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[4]  V. Padmanabhan,et al.  Enhancements to the RADAR User Location and Tracking System , 2000 .

[5]  Emre Ertin,et al.  Self-localization of wireless sensor networks using self-organizing maps , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  Cooperative Localization in Wireless Networks , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Wolfgang Effelsberg,et al.  COMPASS: A probabilistic indoor positioning system based on 802.11 and digital compasses , 2006, WINTECH.

[8]  Axel Küpper Location-based Services: Fundamentals and Operation , 2005 .

[9]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Wireless communications - principles and practice , 1996 .

[10]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Fingerprinting Localization in Wireless Networks Based on Received-Signal-Strength Measurements: A Case Study on WiMAX Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[11]  Polly Huang,et al.  Sensor-assisted wi-fi indoor location system for adapting to environmental dynamics , 2005, MSWiM '05.

[12]  Jing Liu,et al.  Survey of Wireless Indoor Positioning Techniques and Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[13]  Henry Tirri,et al.  A Probabilistic Approach to WLAN User Location Estimation , 2002, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[14]  Andrew Chi-Sing Leung,et al.  Yet another algorithm which can generate topography map , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[15]  Dario Petri,et al.  Accuracy of RSS-Based Centroid Localization Algorithms in an Indoor Environment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[16]  F. Gustafsson,et al.  Mobile positioning using wireless networks: possibilities and fundamental limitations based on available wireless network measurements , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[17]  Xinrong Li,et al.  Collaborative Localization With Received-Signal Strength in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[18]  S. Seidel,et al.  914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings , 1992 .

[19]  Ding-Bing Lin,et al.  Mobile location estimation based on differences of signal attenuations for GSM systems , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Kostas E. Bekris,et al.  Robotics-Based Location Sensing Using Wireless Ethernet , 2002, MobiCom '02.

[21]  Makoto Kawai,et al.  Distributed Range-Free Localization Algorithm Based on Self-Organizing Maps , 2009 .

[22]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[23]  Lihua Xie,et al.  An Efficient EM Algorithm for Energy-Based Multisource Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[24]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Reducing the Calibration Effort for Probabilistic Indoor Location Estimation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[25]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Energy-Efficient Distributed Adaptive Multisensor Scheduling for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[26]  Ignas Niemegeers,et al.  A survey of indoor positioning systems for wireless personal networks , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[27]  Asim Smailagic,et al.  Location sensing and privacy in a context-aware computing environment , 2002, IEEE Wirel. Commun..