Ontology-based Requirements Transformation

This paper presents an ontology-based approach to the supply chain-aware transformation of functional and environmental load requirements given by so-called Mission Profiles (MPs). The approach aims at improving the efficiency of the engineering process through supporting the transformation process and enabling a better integration of the transformation into existing Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) processes. We propose a methodology and a supporting system which aids in the transformation process while the latter feature is obtained by constructing and working on models. Consequent utilization of the standardized language OWL to express model representations further enables better knowledge integration and transfer among heterogeneous systems. In addition to that, this favors knowledge reuse across projects which can reduce overall costs. Moreover, the system enables stripping off irrelevant information from MPs, thus improving protection of intellectual property.

[1]  Krzysztof Czarnecki,et al.  Classification of Model Transformation Approaches , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel Hahn,et al.  Complexity, quality and robustness - the challenges of tomorrow's automotive electronics , 2012, 2012 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[3]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Mission profile aware robustness assessment of automotive power devices , 2014, 2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[4]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL , 2005, SEMWEB.

[5]  W. Gareth J. Howells,et al.  SiTra: simple transformations in Java , 2006, MoDELS'06.

[6]  Martin Odersky,et al.  An Overview of the Scala Programming Language , 2004 .

[7]  Mohamed Ben Ahmed,et al.  Ontology based knowledge modeling for System Engineering projects , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science.

[8]  Andrew B. Kahng,et al.  Mission profile aware IC design — A case study , 2014, 2014 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE).

[9]  Grant Soremekun,et al.  Systems engineering challenges and MBSE opportunities for automotive system design , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC).

[10]  Roy Fielding,et al.  Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures"; Doctoral dissertation , 2000 .

[11]  Ragnhild Van Der Straeten,et al.  Module superimposition: a composition technique for rule-based model transformation languages , 2010, Software & Systems Modeling.

[12]  Jon Whittle,et al.  A survey of approaches for verifying model transformations , 2013, Software & Systems Modeling.

[13]  Gerti Kappel,et al.  Reuse in model-to-model transformation languages: are we there yet? , 2013, Software & Systems Modeling.

[14]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The protégé project: a look back and a look forward , 2015, SIGAI.

[15]  Georges Gielen,et al.  CMOS Reliability Overview , 2013 .

[16]  Dániel Varró,et al.  Survey and classification of model transformation tools , 2018, Software & Systems Modeling.

[17]  Tim Berners-Lee,et al.  Linked Data - The Story So Far , 2009, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[18]  Jean Bézivin,et al.  ATL: a QVT-like transformation language , 2006, OOPSLA '06.

[19]  Richard F. Paige,et al.  The Epsilon Transformation Language , 2008, ICMT@TOOLS.

[20]  Lui Wang,et al.  Effort to Accelerate MBSE Adoption and Usage at JSC , 2016 .