Spatial and Frequency Differences of Neuromagnetic Activities Between the Perception of Open- and Closed-class Words

The present study investigated the spatial and frequency differences of neuromagnetic activities between the perception of open- and closed-class words by using a 275-channel whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Two groups of words, 110 open-class and 110 closed-class, were presented visually and auditorily simultaneously. The data of 12 healthy subjects were analyzed with synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) which can identify the frequency-dependent volumetric distribution of evoked magnetic fields (EMFs). Both vocabulary classes elicited spectral power changes in the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca’s area) and left posterior-superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke’s area) within 70–120 Hz. However, the open-class words elicited event-related desynchronization (ERD) while the closed-class words elicited event-related synchronization (ERS) in the two areas within 70–120 Hz. In addition, the open-class words also elicited ERS in the right inferior frontal gyrus, right middle frontal gyrus and right inferior parietal lobe within 1–8 Hz, but the closed-class words only elicited ERD in the right inferior frontal gyrus within 1–8 Hz. Furthermore, there were ERD in the right posterior-superior temporal gyrus within 120–200 Hz for the open-class words, but not for the closed-class words. These results indicate that open- and closed-class words are processed differently in the brain, not only in the anatomical substrates, but also in the frequency range of neuromagnetic activity.

[1]  A. Marantz,et al.  A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  G. Barnes,et al.  Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Robinson Se,et al.  Localization of event-related activity by SAM(erf). , 2004 .

[5]  S. Baumann,et al.  Source localization of two evoked magnetic field components using two alternative procedures , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Merrill F. Garrett,et al.  Hemisphere differences in the recognition of closed and open class words , 1983, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  George V. Maverick.  Book Review:Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English Henry Kucera, W. Nelson Francis , 1969 .

[9]  Se Robinson,et al.  Functional neuroimaging by Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) , 1999 .

[10]  D Y von Cramon,et al.  Segregating semantic and syntactic aspects of processing in the human brain: an fMRI investigation of different word types. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  A. Friederici,et al.  Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and semantic information , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[12]  A. Szentkuti,et al.  Differences in brain potentials to open and closed class words: class and frequency effects , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[15]  A. W. Ellis.  Normality and pathology in cognitive functions , 1982 .

[16]  C. Fiebach,et al.  The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  Ton Dijkstra,et al.  Theta Responses Are Involved in LexicalSemantic Retrieval during Language Processing , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Otsubo,et al.  Neuromagnetic spectral distribution of implicit processing of words , 2001, Neuroreport.

[19]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Activation of human primary motor cortex during action observation: a neuromagnetic study. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[22]  Bettina Mohr,et al.  Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  F. D. Silva.  Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks. , 1991 .

[24]  Friedemann Pulvermiiller.  Agrammatism: Behavioral Description and Neurobiological Explanation , 1995 .

[25]  H. Neville,et al.  Fractionating language: different neural subsystems with different sensitive periods. , 1992, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Electrophysiological Signatures of Visual Lexical Processing: Open-and Closed-Class Words , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  S. Chuang,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of neuromagnetic activation associated with mirror reading. , 2004, Neurology & Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  E. Plante,et al.  Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Arjan Hillebrand,et al.  Beamformer analysis of MEG data. , 2005, International review of neurobiology.

[31]  T. Yoshimoto,et al.  Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  S. L. Small.  Different neural circuits subserve reading before and after therapy for acquired dyslexia , 1998 .

[33]  Y. Okada,et al.  High-Frequency Signals (>400 Hz): A New Window in Electrophysiological Analysis of the Somatosensory System , 2005, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[34]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  A. Friederici.  Levels of processing and vocabulary types: Evidence from on-line comprehension in normals and agrammatics , 1985, Cognition.

[36]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[37]  A. A. Fife,et al.  Advanced electronics for the CTF MEG system. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[38]  Gareth R. Barnes,et al.  Group imaging of task-related changes in cortical synchronisation using nonparametric permutation testing , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  J. Gore,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Study of Implicit Phrase-Level Syntactic and Semantic Processing , 1999, NeuroImage.

[41]  Adrian L. Williams,et al.  Task-Related Changes in Cortical Synchronization Are Spatially Coincident with the Hemodynamic Response , 2002, NeuroImage.

[42]  F Pulvermüller,et al.  Hebb's concept of cell assemblies and the psychophysiology of word processing. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[43]  A. Friederici,et al.  Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[44]  D. Caplan.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Syntactic Processing , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[46]  Max Coltheart,et al.  The MRC Psycholinguistic Database , 1981 .