Improving tactile feedback with an impedance adapter

Vibration motors are often used to generate tactile effects by exciting a mass at a given frequency and amplitude. The characteristic impedance of this vibrotactile device is not always in harmony with the impedance of the human skin. This impedance mismatch can result in poor energy transfer, necessitating larger motors and greater power consumption than otherwise required. Herein, we investigate the feasibility of improving the energy transfer by placing a medium between the skin and the motor, which we dub an impedance adapter. We simulate the effects of this impedance adapter using a mathematical model, and evaluate its effect on skin displacement and a parameter we call skin stimulus. Skin stimulus is introduced as a measure of the perceptive effects of a haptic system, and is used to compare results between systems with an impedance adapter and those without. Our findings suggest a factor of four improvement in skin displacement and a two-fold increase in skin stimulus are possible by introducing an optimized impedance adapter.

[1]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Mechanical behavior of the fingertip in the range of frequencies and displacements relevant to touch. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  Bruce J. P. Mortimer,et al.  Vibrotactile transduction and transducers. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Antony W. Goodwin,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of the receptor system , 2008 .

[4]  Karun B. Shimoga,et al.  A survey of perceptual feedback issues in dexterous telemanipulation. I. Finger force feedback , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium.

[5]  E. Franke,et al.  The Mechanical Impedance of the Surface of the Human Body , 1949 .

[6]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[7]  R. Howe,et al.  Dynamic lumped element response of the human fingerpad. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[8]  '. B.Vallbo.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand-related to touch sensation , 1999 .

[9]  R T Verrillo,et al.  Vibrotactile thresholds for hairy skin. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  T. J. Moore,et al.  Measurement of Specific Mechanical Impedance of the Skin: Effects of Static Force, Site of Stimulation, Area of Probe, and Presence of a Surround , 1972 .

[11]  Vincent Hayward,et al.  Transducer for mechanical impedance testing over a wide frequency range through active feedback. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[12]  T. Diller.  Frequency response of human skin in vivo to mechanical stimulation , 2001 .

[13]  E. Franke,et al.  Mechanical impedance of the surface of the human body. , 1951, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  R. Lundström.  Local vibrations--mechanical impedance of the human hand's glabrous skin. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Durand R. Begault,et al.  Sensitivity to haptic-audio asynchrony , 2003, ICMI '03.

[16]  Martin Buss,et al.  Construction and first evaluation of a newly developed tactile Shear Force Display , 2004 .

[17]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  Texture-induced vibrations in the forearm during tactile exploration , 2012, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[18]  Mandayam A. Srinivasan,et al.  Tangential versus normal displacements of skin: relative effectiveness for producing tactile sensations , 2002, Proceedings 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. HAPTICS 2002.

[19]  Caroline Jay,et al.  Modeling the effects of delayed haptic and visual feedback in a collaborative virtual environment , 2007, TCHI.