RosettaBackrub—a web server for flexible backbone protein structure modeling and design

The RosettaBackrub server (http://kortemmelab.ucsf.edu/backrub) implements the Backrub method, derived from observations of alternative conformations in high-resolution protein crystal structures, for flexible backbone protein modeling. Backrub modeling is applied to three related applications using the Rosetta program for structure prediction and design: (I) modeling of structures of point mutations, (II) generating protein conformational ensembles and designing sequences consistent with these conformations and (III) predicting tolerated sequences at protein–protein interfaces. The three protocols have been validated on experimental data. Starting from a user-provided single input protein structure in PDB format, the server generates near-native conformational ensembles. The predicted conformations and sequences can be used for different applications, such as to guide mutagenesis experiments, for ensemble-docking approaches or to generate sequence libraries for protein design.

[1]  J G Saven,et al.  Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Baker,et al.  A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Sergey Lyskov,et al.  The RosettaDock server for local protein–protein docking , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[4]  Jens Meiler,et al.  A Correspondence Between Solution-State Dynamics of an Individual Protein and the Sequence and Conformational Diversity of its Family , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[5]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  François Stricher,et al.  The FoldX web server: an online force field , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[7]  Bruce Randall Donald,et al.  Algorithm for backrub motions in protein design , 2008, ISMB.

[8]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Large‐scale prediction of protein geometry and stability changes for arbitrary single point mutations , 2004, Proteins.

[9]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[10]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Recognition Dynamics Up to Microseconds Revealed from an RDC-Derived Ubiquitin Ensemble in Solution , 2008, Science.

[11]  M. Michael Gromiha,et al.  CUPSAT: prediction of protein stability upon point mutations , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[13]  David Baker,et al.  A New Twist in TCR Diversity Revealed by a Forbidden αβ TCR , 2008 .

[14]  David Baker,et al.  Mutations Designed to Destabilize the Receptor-Bound Conformation Increase MICA-NKG2D Association Rate and Affinity* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[17]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. , 2006, Structure.

[18]  D. Baker,et al.  Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  David Baker,et al.  Convergent mechanisms for recognition of divergent cytokines by the shared signaling receptor gp130. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[20]  David Baker,et al.  Assessment of the optimization of affinity and specificity at protein–DNA interfaces , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[21]  John R Desjarlais,et al.  A de novo redesign of the WW domain , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[22]  David Baker,et al.  Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. , 2008, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[24]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[25]  A Keith Dunker,et al.  Exploring the molecular design of protein interaction sites with molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[26]  G. Schreiber,et al.  Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[27]  Shuangye Yin,et al.  Eris: an automated estimator of protein stability , 2007, Nature Methods.

[28]  D. Baker,et al.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[30]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Elisabeth L. Humphris,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. , 2008, Structure.

[32]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[33]  B. L. de Groot,et al.  Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles. , 2009, Nature methods.

[34]  G. Petsko,et al.  Conformational substates in a protein: structure and dynamics of metmyoglobin at 80 K. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Thoroughly sampling sequence space: Large‐scale protein design of structural ensembles , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  H Kono,et al.  Statistical Theory for Protein Combinatorial Libraries , 2001 .

[37]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a new hydrogen bond network and at least a 300-fold specificity switch at a protein-protein interface. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Structural model of the mAb 806-EGFR complex using computational docking followed by computational and experimental mutagenesis. , 2006, Structure.

[39]  Nir London,et al.  FunHunt: model selection based on energy landscape characteristics. , 2008, Biochemical Society transactions.

[40]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  David Baker,et al.  A new twist in TCR diversity revealed by a forbidden alphabeta TCR. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  Sachdev S Sidhu,et al.  Comprehensive and Quantitative Mapping of Energy Landscapes for Protein-Protein Interactions by Rapid Combinatorial Scanning*♦ , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[43]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Design of Multi-Specificity in Protein Interfaces , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  David E. Kim,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning of Protein-Protein Interfaces , 2004, Science's STKE.

[46]  Yi Liu,et al.  RosettaDesign server for protein design , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[48]  Piero Fariselli,et al.  I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[49]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Lars Malmström,et al.  Prediction of CASP6 structures using automated robetta protocols , 2005, Proteins.

[51]  Christopher T. Saunders,et al.  Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Testing a flexible-receptor docking algorithm in a model binding site. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  David Baker,et al.  Symmetry recognizing asymmetry: analysis of the interactions between the C-type lectin-like immunoreceptor NKG2D and MHC class I-like ligands. , 2003, Structure.

[54]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.

[55]  Feng Ding,et al.  Correction: Emergence of Protein Fold Families through Rational Design , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..