Priming biological motion changes extrapersonal space categorization.

Recent results have shown that the way we categorize space varies as a function of the frame of reference. If the reference frame (RF) is another person vs. an object, the distance is judged as reduced. It has been suggested that such an effect is due to the spontaneous processing of the other's motor potentialities. To investigate the impact of movement representation on space perception, we used biological motion displays as a prime for a spatial categorization task. In Exp. 1, participants were presented with a point-light walker or a scrambled motion, and then judged the location ("Near" or "Far") of a target with a human body or an inanimate object as RF. In Exp. 2, participants were primed with point-light walkers of different speeds: a runner, a normal walker and a slow walker. In Exp. 3 they were primed with a point-light display depicting a human body sitting down on or standing up from a chair, with a human body RF either oriented or not oriented towards the target. Results showed a reduced judged distance when the human body RF was primed with a point-light walker (Exp. 1). Furthermore, we found an additional reduction of the judged distance when priming with a runner (Exp. 2). Finally, Exp. 3 showed that the human body RF has to be target oriented as a precondition for priming effects of the point-light walker.

[1]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[2]  B. Tversky,et al.  Embodied and disembodied cognition: Spatial perspective-taking , 2009, Cognition.

[3]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[5]  Marcello Costantini,et al.  Grasping affordances with the other's hand: a TMS study. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[6]  Michael A Crognale,et al.  Development, maturation, and aging of chromatic visual pathways: VEP results. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[7]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Effects of TMS over Premotor and Superior Temporal Cortices on Biological Motion Perception , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Gaetano Tieri,et al.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Giorgia Committeri,et al.  Sharing Space: The Presence of Other Bodies Extends the Space Judged as Near , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Experimental approaches to action , 2003 .

[12]  N. Troje Decomposing biological motion: a framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[13]  M. Sereno,et al.  Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[15]  Marcel Brass,et al.  How Watching Pinocchio Movies Changes Our Subjective Experience of Extrapersonal Space , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[17]  D. Proffitt CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Distance Perception , 2022 .

[18]  Dorita H. F. Chang,et al.  Perception of animacy and direction from local biological motion signals. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[19]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[20]  C. Frith,et al.  Social cognition in the we-mode , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[24]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[26]  N. Troje,et al.  The Inversion Effect in Biological Motion Perception: Evidence for a “Life Detector”? , 2006, Current Biology.

[27]  G. Committeri,et al.  Social scaling of extrapersonal space: Target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities , 2015, Cognition.

[28]  M. Costantini,et al.  When objects are close to me: Affordances in the peripersonal space , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.