Sensor-based motion-planning of a manipulator to overcome large transmission delays in teleoperation

To overcome the time delay problem, we claim that a slave arm should have an autonomy. In this research, a shared autonomy is designed under the sensor-based motion-planning algorithm. A human roughly selects an approximate sequence of fine motions by a master arm while watching its virtual slave arm in a 3D graphics environment at a master site. Then, a computer at the master site communicates the sequence to a computer at a slave site. In succession, by the sensor-based motion-planning under the impedance control, the communicated sequence is precisely coordinated in a real assembly task at a remote site. Due to the real-time adjustment, a slave arm performs an assembly task such as a peg-in-hole task very well. Furthermore, the sensor-based motion-planning is supported by local sensor information; it is robust against position and orientation errors of a slave arm or communication error between master and slave sites. Finally, the usefulness of the shared autonomy is ascertained in an experiment between master and slave sites.

[1]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Designing force reflecting teleoperators with large time delays to appear as virtual tools , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Hiroshi Noborio,et al.  Fast interference check method using octree representation , 1988, Adv. Robotics.

[3]  泰義 横小路 Analysis and design of master-slave teleoperation systems , 1991 .

[4]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Sensor-based space robotics-ROTEX and its telerobotic features , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[5]  Taisuke Sakaki,et al.  Impedance controlled master slave manipulation system Part I: Basic concept and application to the system with time delay.:Basic Concept and Application to the System with Time Delay , 1990 .

[6]  Hiroshi Noborio,et al.  A comparative study between real force made in experiment and virtual force made in octree-based algorithm , 1999, 8th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interaction. RO-MAN '99 (Cat. No.99TH8483).

[7]  Koichi Osuka,et al.  A New Identification Method for Manipulators , 1986 .

[8]  R. C. Goertz,et al.  A FORCE-REFLECTING POSITIONAL SERVOMECHANISM , 1952 .

[9]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[10]  Hiroshi Noborio,et al.  A near-optimal sensor-based motion-planning algorithm for parts mating , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[11]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay , 1989 .

[12]  Hiroshi Noborio,et al.  Experiments with a 3DD robotic manipulator operating by a sensor-based assembly , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning (ISATP'97) - Towards Flexible and Agile Assembly and Manufacturing -.

[13]  Shigeoki Hirai A Theoretical View of Shared Autonomy , 1993 .

[14]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Using wave variables for system analysis and robot control , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  R. Goertz FUNDAMENTALS OF GENERAL-PURPOSE REMOTE MANIPULATORS , 1952 .

[16]  H. Kawasaki,et al.  Terminal-Link Parameter Estimation and Trajectory Control of Robotic Manipulators , 1985 .

[17]  Yasuyoshi Yokokohji Control Theory of Master-slave System , 1993 .

[18]  Thomas B. Sheridan,et al.  Space teleoperation through time delay: review and prognosis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[19]  Won S. Kim,et al.  Demonstration of a high-fidelity predictive/preview display technique for telerobotic servicing in space , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..