Evaluating Eco-Friendly Refrigerant Alternatives for Cascade Refrigeration Systems: A Thermoeconomic Analysis

A simple vapor-compression refrigeration system becomes ineffective and inefficient as it consumes a huge energy supply when operating between large temperature differences. Moreover, the recent Kigali amendment has raised a concern about phasing out some hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants due to their impact on the environment. In this paper, a numerical investigation is carried out to compare the performance of a cascade refrigeration system with two environmentally friendly refrigerant combinations, namely, R170–R404A and R41–R404A. Refrigerant R170, from the hydrocarbon category, and refrigerant R41, from the hydrofluorocarbon category, are separately chosen for the low-temperature circuit due to their similar thermophysical properties. On the other hand, refrigerant R404A is selected for the high-temperature circuit. An attempt is made to replace refrigerant R41 with refrigerant R170 as a possible alternative. The condenser temperature is kept constant at 40 °C, and the evaporator temperature is varied from −60 °C to −30 °C. The mathematical model developed for the cascade refrigeration system is solved using Engineering Equation Solver (EES). The effect of evaporator temperature on different performance parameters such as the COP, exergetic efficiency, and total plant cost rate is evaluated. The predicted results show that the thermoeconomic performance of the R170–R404A-based system is marginally lower compared to that of the R41–R404A-based system. The system using refrigerant pair R170–R404A has achieved only a 2.4% lower exergetic efficiency compared to the system using R41–R404A, with an increase in the annual plant cost rate of only USD 200. As the global warming potential (GWP) of R170 is less than that of R41, and R170 belongs to the hydrocarbon category, the use of the R170–R404A combination in a cascade refrigeration system can be recommended as an alternative to R41–R404A.

[1]  R. Llopis,et al.  Energy comparison based on experimental results of a cascade refrigeration system pairing R744 with R134a, R1234ze(E) and the natural refrigerants R290, R1270, R600a , 2023, International Journal of Refrigeration.

[2]  Zhili Sun,et al.  Comprehensive performance analysis of cascade refrigeration system with two-stage compression for industrial refrigeration , 2022, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering.

[3]  Mohammed Raihan Uddin,et al.  A Comprehensive Thermodynamic Assessment of Cascade Refrigeration System Utilizing Low GWP Hydrocarbon Refrigerants , 2022, International Journal of Thermofluids.

[4]  D. Verma,et al.  Theoretical energy analysis of Cascade refrigeration system using low Global warming potential refrigerants , 2022, Materials Today: Proceedings.

[5]  M. Deymi-Dashtebayaz,et al.  Energy, exergoeconomic and environmental optimization of a cascade refrigeration system using different low GWP refrigerants , 2021, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering.

[6]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Subcritical Cascade Refrigeration System With Internal Heat Exchangers Using Environmentally Friendly Refrigerants , 2020 .

[7]  O. Bamisile,et al.  Comparative thermodynamic performance analysis of a cascade refrigeration system with new refrigerants paired with CO2 , 2020 .

[8]  I. Ozturk,et al.  Comparative energy and exergy analysis of a subcritical cascade refrigeration system using low global warming potential refrigerants , 2020 .

[9]  Yeqiang Zhang,et al.  Experimental investigation of the performance of an R1270/CO2 cascade refrigerant system , 2020 .

[10]  B. Mandal,et al.  Exergy and Cost Optimization of a Two-Stage Refrigeration System Using Refrigerant R32 and R410A , 2020 .

[11]  B. Mandal,et al.  Thermo-economic analysis and multi-objective optimization of vapour cascade refrigeration system using different refrigerant combinations , 2019, Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry.

[12]  Vivek K. Patel,et al.  University of Birmingham An efficient optimization and comparative analysis of cascade refrigeration system using NH3 /CO2 and C3H8/CO2 refrigerant pairs , 2019 .

[13]  Samir Chowdhury,et al.  A Review on Energy and Exergy Analysis of Two-Stage Vapour Compression Refrigeration System , 2019, International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration.

[14]  B. Mandal,et al.  Energetic and exergetic performance comparison of cascade refrigeration system using R170-R161 and R41-R404A as refrigerant pairs , 2018, Heat and Mass Transfer.

[15]  P. Ahmadi,et al.  Advanced exergy analysis of a carbon dioxide ammonia cascade refrigeration system , 2018, Applied Thermal Engineering.

[16]  Ibrahim Dincer,et al.  Optimization of Energy Systems , 2017 .

[17]  Ranendra Roy,et al.  Thermodynamic Analysis of Modified Vapour Compression Refrigeration System Using R-134a , 2017 .

[18]  E. A. Heath Amendment to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Kigali Amendment) , 2017, International Legal Materials.

[19]  Youcai Liang,et al.  Comparative analysis of thermodynamic performance of a cascade refrigeration system for refrigerant couples R41/R404A and R23/R404A , 2016 .

[20]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of CO 2 /NH 3 cascade refrigeration systems equipped with different types of flash tank intercoolers , 2016 .

[21]  A. H. Mosaffa,et al.  Exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of an air conditioning system using thermal energy storage , 2016 .

[22]  Y. Ust,et al.  Analysis of a Cascade Refrigeration System (CRS) by Using Different Refrigerant Couples Based on the Exergetic Performance Coefficient (EPC) Criterion , 2014 .

[23]  Fabio Rinaldi,et al.  Exergetic, economic and environmental (3E) analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration system , 2014 .

[24]  S. Sanaye,et al.  Four E analysis and multi-objective optimization of an ice thermal energy storage for air-conditioning applications , 2013 .

[25]  Domenico Panno,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CASCADE REFRIGERATION SYSTEMS USING DIFFERENT REFRIGERANTS , 2012 .

[26]  W. Rivera,et al.  Comparative study of a cascade cycle for simultaneous refrigeration and heating operating with ammonia, R134a, butane, propane, and CO2 as working fluids , 2012 .

[27]  Ali Behbahaninia,et al.  Thermoeconomic optimization and exergy analysis of CO 2/NH 3 cascade refrigeration systems , 2011 .

[28]  Zhiqiang Zhai,et al.  Particle swarm optimization for redundant building cooling heating and power system , 2010 .

[29]  José Fernández-Seara,et al.  Theoretical analysis of a CO2–NH3 cascade refrigeration system for cooling applications at low temperatures , 2009 .

[30]  S. C. Kaushik,et al.  Theoretical analysis of a vapour compression refrigeration system with R502, R404A and R507A , 2008 .

[31]  Murat Hoşöz,et al.  Performance Comparison of Single-Stage and Cascade Refrigeration Systems Using R134a as the Working Fluid , 2005 .

[32]  Tzong-Shing Lee,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of optimal condensing temperature of cascade-condenser in CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration systems , 2005 .

[33]  Omar Imine,et al.  Exergy analysis of a two-stage refrigeration cycle using two natural substitutes of HCFC22 , 2005 .

[34]  Fabio Polonara,et al.  Blends of carbon dioxide and HFCs as working fluids for the low-temperature circuit in cascade refrigerating systems , 2005 .

[35]  Parthiban Kasi SIMULATION OF THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF CASCADE REFRIGERATION SYSTEM WITH ALTERNATIVE REFRIGERANTS , 2015 .

[36]  José Fernández-Seara,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a cascade refrigeration system prototype with CO2 and NH3 for freezing process applications , 2011 .

[37]  Baolian Niu,et al.  Experimental study of the refrigeration cycle performance for the R744/R290 mixtures , 2007 .

[38]  J. M. Calm,et al.  Refrigerant Data Summary , 2001 .