Contact Detection and Size Estimation Using a Modular Soft Gripper with Embedded Flex Sensors

Grippers made from soft elastomers are able to passively and gently adapt to their targets allowing deformable objects to be grasped safely without causing bruise or damage. However, it is difficult to regulate the contact forces due to the lack of contact feedback for such grippers. In this paper, a modular soft gripper is presented utilizing interchangeable soft pneumatic actuators with embedded flex sensors as fingers of the gripper. The fingers can be assembled in different configurations using 3D printed connectors. The paper investigates the potential of utilizing the simple sensory feedback from the flex and pressure sensors to make additional meaningful inferences regarding the contact state and grasped object size. We study the effect of the grasped object size and contact type on the combined feedback from the embedded flex sensors of opposing fingers. Our results show that a simple linear relationship exists between the grasped object size and the final flex sensor reading at fixed input conditions, despite the variation in object weight and contact type. Additionally, by simply monitoring the time series response from the flex sensor, contact can be detected by comparing the response to the known free-bending response at the same input conditions. Furthermore, by utilizing the measured internal pressure supplied to the soft fingers, it is possible to distinguish between power and pinch grasps, as the contact type affects the rate of change in the flex sensor readings against the internal pressure.

[1]  WeiYing,et al.  A Novel, Variable Stiffness Robotic Gripper Based on Integrated Soft Actuating and Particle Jamming , 2016 .

[2]  YapHong Kai,et al.  High-Force Soft Printable Pneumatics for Soft Robotic Applications , 2016 .

[3]  D. Floreano,et al.  Versatile Soft Grippers with Intrinsic Electroadhesion Based on Multifunctional Polymer Actuators , 2016, Advanced materials.

[4]  H. Jaeger Celebrating Soft Matter's 10th Anniversary: toward jamming by design. , 2015, Soft matter.

[5]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Mehmet Remzi Dogar,et al.  Haptic identification of objects using a modular soft robotic gripper , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[8]  Daniela Rus,et al.  A Recipe for Soft Fluidic Elastomer Robots , 2015, Soft robotics.

[9]  Jonathan Rossiter,et al.  Soft pneumatic grippers embedded with stretchable electroadhesion , 2018 .

[10]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  A Prestressed Soft Gripper: Design, Modeling, Fabrication, and Tests for Food Handling , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[11]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  A 3D printed soft gripper integrated with curvature sensor for studying soft grasping , 2016, 2016 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII).

[12]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[13]  LipsonHod,et al.  The JamHand: Dexterous Manipulation with Minimal Actuation , 2017 .

[14]  Samia Nefti-Meziani,et al.  Design of a variable stiffness soft dexterous , 2019 .

[15]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction   , 2017 .

[16]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Soft Robotic Grippers for Biological Sampling on Deep Reefs , 2016, Soft robotics.

[17]  Nicholas Kellaris,et al.  Peano-HASEL actuators: Muscle-mimetic, electrohydraulic transducers that linearly contract on activation , 2018, Science Robotics.

[18]  Fumiya Iida,et al.  Soft Manipulators and Grippers: A Review , 2016, Front. Robot. AI.

[19]  CianchettiMatteo,et al.  Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today's Minimally Invasive Surgery: The STIFF-FLOP Approach , 2014 .

[20]  Suiyang Khoo,et al.  Evolution of 3D printed soft actuators , 2016 .

[21]  Lucia Rita Quitadamo,et al.  Resistive flex sensors: a survey , 2015 .

[22]  T. Nanayakkara,et al.  Soft Robotics Technologies to Address Shortcomings in Today ’ s Minimally Invasive Surgery : The STIFF-FLOP Approach , 2014 .

[23]  Mohammad Biglarbegian,et al.  State of the Art Robotic Grippers and Applications , 2016, Robotics.

[24]  Hod Lipson,et al.  The JamHand: Dexterous Manipulation with Minimal Actuation. , 2017, Soft robotics.

[25]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  Feedback Control of Soft Robot Actuators via Commercial Flex Bend Sensors , 2017, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[26]  Mats Jackson,et al.  Bending angle prediction and control of soft pneumatic actuators with embedded flex sensors: a data-driven approach , 2017 .