Exploring a Personal Social Knowledge Network (PSKN) to aid the observation of connectivist interaction for high- and low-performing learners in connectivist massive open online courses

This study adds a new perspective to the observations about connectivist interaction behavior in cMOOCs by extending the notion of network building from the perspective of individuals. We explore the possibility of building a learning network named Personal Social Knowledge Network (PSKN) to support in the monitoring of learning performance and interaction in cMOOCs. The sample in this study included 284 preservice teachers and their learning lasted approximately 12 weeks. Data were primarily gathered by PSKN graphs. The results revealed a correlation between connectivist interaction measured by the PSKN (including density structure) and learning performance. The results also revealed differences in connectivist interaction behavior and patterns, indicated by PSKN (densities and structures), for high‐ and low‐performing learners in cMOOCs. The high‐performing learners show deeper knowledge interaction and social communication in addition to simple knowledge sharing and social communication. Additionally, as time passed and the PSKN of high‐performing learners extended further, their interaction behavior became more complex and their role had gradually changed from "learning" to "teaching" as well as from knowledge acceptance to knowledge creation in cMOOCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[1]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Minjuan Wang,et al.  From Learning Object to Learning Cell: A Resource Organization Model for Ubiquitous Learning , 2013, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Roles of Course Facilitators, Learners, and Technology in the Flow of Information of a CMOOC , 2015 .

[4]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[5]  Mia Zamora,et al.  What makes a cMOOC community endure? Multiple participant perspectives from diverse cMOOCs , 2015 .

[6]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Interaction pattern analysis in cMOOCs based on the connectivist interaction and engagement framework , 2017, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[8]  T. Anderson,et al.  A framework for interaction and cognitive engagement in connectivist learning contexts , 2014 .

[9]  Shane Dawson,et al.  'Seeing' the learning community: An exploration of the development of a resource for monitoring online student networking , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[10]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The 3P Learning Model , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Marion Waite,et al.  Learning in a Small, Task-Oriented, Connectivist MOOC: Pedagogical Issues and Implications for Higher Education. , 2013 .

[12]  T. Anderson,et al.  How Learners Participate in Connectivist Learning: An Analysis of the Interaction Traces From a cMOOC , 2018 .

[13]  Sarah Honeychurch,et al.  Community Tracking in a cMooc and Nomadic Learner Behavior Identification on a Connectivist Rhizomatic Learning Network , 2016 .

[14]  Chelsea Dobbins,et al.  The utilization of data analysis techniques in predicting student performance in massive open online courses (MOOCs) , 2015, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[15]  Judith A. Ramaley,et al.  How Disruptive is Information Technology Really , 2013 .

[16]  C. Bremer.  Informal a nd Nonformal Learning in cMOOCs , 2018 .

[17]  Manuel Benito,et al.  Reviewing the differences in size, composition and structure between the personal networks of high- and low-performing students , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..