Density-functional fluctuation theory of crowds

A primary goal of collective population behavior studies is to determine the rules governing crowd distributions in order to predict future behaviors in new environments. Current top-down modeling approaches describe, instead of predict, specific emergent behaviors, whereas bottom-up approaches must postulate, instead of directly determine, rules for individual behaviors. Here, we employ classical density functional theory (DFT) to quantify, directly from observations of local crowd density, the rules that predict mass behaviors under new circumstances. To demonstrate our theory-based, data-driven approach, we use a model crowd consisting of walking fruit flies and extract two functions that separately describe spatial and social preferences. The resulting theory accurately predicts experimental fly distributions in new environments and provides quantification of the crowd “mood”. Should this approach generalize beyond milling crowds, it may find powerful applications in fields ranging from spatial ecology and active matter to demography and economics.Tools from statistical physics can be used to investigate a large variety of fields ranging from economics to biology. Here the authors first adapt density-functional theory to predict the distributions of crowds in new environments and then validate their approach using groups of fruit flies.

[1]  I. Couzin,et al.  Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  David Hu,et al.  Mechanics of fire ant aggregations. , 2016, Nature materials.

[3]  L. R. Taylor,et al.  Aggregation, Variance and the Mean , 1961, Nature.

[4]  Pavan Ramdya,et al.  The neurogenetics of group behavior in Drosophila melanogaster , 2017, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[5]  G. D. de Polavieja,et al.  Ontogeny of collective behavior reveals a simple attraction rule , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Jean-René Martin,et al.  Centrophobism/thigmotaxis, a new role for the mushroom bodies in Drosophila. , 2005, Journal of neurobiology.

[7]  David L. Smith,et al.  Quantifying the Impact of Human Mobility on Malaria , 2012, Science.

[8]  Itai Cohen,et al.  Collective motion of humans in mosh and circle pits at heavy metal concerts. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[10]  G. Parisi,et al.  Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  F. Reif,et al.  Fundamentals of Statistical and Thermal Physics , 1965 .

[12]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups , 2001, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228).

[13]  Daniel M. Conti,et al.  Dynamic scaling in natural swarms , 2016, Nature Physics.

[14]  Garnet Kin-Lic Chan,et al.  Time-dependent density functional theory of classical fluids. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[15]  D. Floreano,et al.  Mechanosensory Interactions Drive Collective Behaviour in Drosophila , 2014, Nature.

[16]  William J. Bell,et al.  Sucrose-stimulated searching behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster in a uniform habitat: modulation by period of deprivation , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Yan Zhu,et al.  A Novel Assay Reveals Hygrotactic Behavior in Drosophila , 2015, PloS one.

[18]  Mathew E. Hauer,et al.  Migration induced by sea-level rise could reshape the US population landscape , 2017 .

[19]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  E. Gross,et al.  Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems , 1984 .

[21]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Point Patterns , 2013 .

[22]  Adrien Treuille,et al.  Continuum crowds , 2006, SIGGRAPH 2006.

[23]  Jonathan Schneider,et al.  One, two, and many--a perspective on what groups of Drosophila melanogaster can tell us about social dynamics. , 2012, Advances in genetics.

[24]  Troy Zars,et al.  High and low temperatures have unequal reinforcing properties in Drosophila spatial learning , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[25]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.

[26]  W. Bialek,et al.  Are Biological Systems Poised at Criticality? , 2010, 1012.2242.

[27]  I. Couzin,et al.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move , 2005, Nature.

[28]  J. Toner,et al.  Flocks, herds, and schools: A quantitative theory of flocking , 1998, cond-mat/9804180.

[29]  Xiaoping Zheng,et al.  Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches , 2009 .

[30]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Virtual Leaders, Artificial Potentials Control of Groups' , 2001 .

[31]  Li An,et al.  Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models , 2012 .

[32]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Social structures depend on innate determinants and chemosensory processing in Drosophila , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  A. Barker Monte Carlo calculations of the radial distribution functions for a proton-electron plasma , 1965 .

[34]  P. Hohenberg,et al.  Inhomogeneous electron gas , 1964 .

[35]  Michael Sinhuber,et al.  Phase Coexistence in Insect Swarms. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[36]  Lu J. Sham,et al.  ONE-PARTICLE PROPERTIES OF AN INHOMOGENEOUS INTERACTING ELECTRON GAS. , 1966 .

[37]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Vicsek,et al.  Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[39]  Scott Kulp,et al.  Consequences of twenty-first-century policy for multi-millennial climate and sea-level change , 2016 .

[40]  Michael H. Dickinson,et al.  Idiothetic Path Integration in the Fruit Fly Drosophila melanogaster , 2017, Current Biology.

[41]  J. Haldane,et al.  A note on inverse probability , 1932, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[42]  Nicola Bellomo,et al.  On the Modeling of Traffic and Crowds: A Survey of Models, Speculations, and Perspectives , 2011, SIAM Rev..

[43]  Jerzy Neyman,et al.  On a New Class of "Contagious" Distributions, Applicable in Entomology and Bacteriology , 1939 .

[44]  M. Kardar,et al.  Pressure is not a state function for generic active fluids , 2014, Nature Physics.

[45]  Robert G. Parr,et al.  Non‐Born–Oppenheimer density functional theory of molecular systems , 1982 .

[46]  Douglas H. Kelley,et al.  Emergent dynamics of laboratory insect swarms , 2013, Scientific Reports.