Imitation Improves Language Comprehension

Humans imitate each other during social interaction. This imitative behavior streamlines social interaction and aids in learning to replicate actions. However, the effect of imitation on action comprehension is unclear. This study investigated whether vocal imitation of an unfamiliar accent improved spoken-language comprehension. Following a pretraining accent comprehension test, participants were assigned to one of six groups. The baseline group received no training, but participants in the other five groups listened to accented sentences, listened to and repeated accented sentences in their own accent, listened to and transcribed accented sentences, listened to and imitated accented sentences, or listened to and imitated accented sentences without being able to hear their own vocalizations. Posttraining measures showed that accent comprehension was most improved for participants who imitated the speaker’s accent. These results show that imitation may aid in streamlining interaction by improving spoken-language comprehension under adverse listening conditions.

[1]  M. Turvey,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  G. Knoblich,et al.  The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[4]  R. van Hout,et al.  An acoustic description of the vowels of northern and southern standard Dutch II: regional varieties. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[6]  M. LaFrance.  Nonverbal synchrony and rapport: Analysis by the cross-lag panel technique. , 1979 .

[7]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Mental state inference using visual control parameters. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[9]  T. Chartrand,et al.  Using Nonconscious Behavioral Mimicry to Create Affiliation and Rapport , 2003, Psychological science.

[10]  P. Adank,et al.  Comprehension of a novel accent by young and older listeners. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[11]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[13]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[15]  P. Denes.  On the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1965 .

[16]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  S. Scott,et al.  Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Why don't we perceive our brain states? , 1992 .

[19]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Explaining Facial Imitation: A Theoretical Model. , 1997, Early development & parenting.

[20]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[21]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  H. Giles,et al.  Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. , 1991 .

[23]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[24]  Véronique Delvaux,et al.  The Influence of Ambient Speech on Adult Speech Productions through Unintentional Imitation , 2007, Phonetica.

[25]  W. Prinz,et al.  The imitative mind : development, evolution, and brain bases , 2002 .

[26]  S. Vogt,et al.  From visuo-motor interactions to imitation learning: Behavioural and brain imaging studies , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[27]  W. Prinz,et al.  Motor learning enhances perceptual judgment: a case for action-perception transfer , 2001, Psychological research.

[28]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  W. Ziegler,et al.  Unintended imitation in nonword repetition , 2009, Brain and Language.

[30]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[32]  J. Dubno,et al.  Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[34]  S Rosen,et al.  Evaluation of maximum-likelihood threshold estimation with tone-in-noise masking , 2001, British journal of audiology.

[35]  E. Vajda.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet , 2000 .

[36]  M. Pickering,et al.  Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  Tanya L. Chartrand,et al.  Priming primates: Human and otherwise , 1998 .