In Search of Pedagogical Agents' Modality and Dialogue Effects in Open Learning Environments

The aims of the present studies were to test the generalizability of the modality and dialogue effect to open learning environments, previously found by Moreno and Mayer (e.g., Moreno, Mayer & Lester, 2001) with an agent providing metacognitive support. As an extension, the agent’s continuous presence effect on learning was also tested. Three studies were conducted. In all studies participants interacted with an open learning environment on an ecological problem. No confirmation was found for the modality or dialogue effect, nor did the agent’s presence have any effect on students’ performance.

[1]  James C. Lester,et al.  Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction , 2000 .

[2]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[4]  R. Atkinson.  Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. , 2002 .

[5]  P. Frensch,et al.  Complex problem solving : the European perspective , 1995 .

[6]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[7]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Pedagogical agent research and development: Next steps and future possibilities , 2005, AIED.

[8]  D. Perkins.  The Fingertip Effect: How Information-Processing Technology Shapes Thinking , 1985 .

[9]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[10]  Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer,et al.  The modality effect in multimedia instructions , 2001 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[12]  John R. Hayes,et al.  The Complete Problem Solver , 1981 .

[13]  Alfred Bork,et al.  Multimedia in Learning , 2001 .

[14]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Stuwawa: studying tool use with and without agents , 2004 .

[15]  J. G. Schuurman,et al.  Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. , 2002 .

[16]  Roxana Moreno,et al.  Pedagogical Agents in Virtual Reality Environments: Do Multimedia Principles Still Apply? , 2002 .

[17]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Student Management of Web-Based Hypermedia Resources During Open-Ended Problem Solving , 2000 .

[18]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia learning in an interactive self-explaining environment: What works in the design of agent , 2003 .

[19]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  Elaboration, organization, and the self-reference effect in memory. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[21]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Pedagogical agents on the Web , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[22]  James C. Lester,et al.  The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents , 1997, CHI.

[23]  J. Sweller,et al.  Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes , 1995 .

[24]  Susan M. Land.  Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments , 2000 .

[25]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Knowledge representation, content specification, and the development of skill in situation-specific knowledge assembly: some constructivist issues as they relate to cognitive flexibility theory and hypertext , 1991 .

[26]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[27]  Peter C. Honebein,et al.  Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environments: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning , 1993 .

[28]  S. Joy Mountford,et al.  The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design , 1990 .

[29]  S. Tobias,et al.  Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring. Report No. 96-01. , 1996 .

[30]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[31]  H. Tabbers,et al.  Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: effects of modality and cueing. , 2004, The British journal of educational psychology.

[32]  Michael J. Reddy.  Metaphor and Thought: The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language , 1993 .

[33]  Barry Arons,et al.  A Review of The Cocktail Party Effect , 1992 .

[34]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[35]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The ideal problem solver. A guide for improving thinking, learning, and creativity , 1984 .

[36]  S. Tobias,et al.  Assessing Metacognitive Knowledge Monitoring , 1996 .

[37]  Jeeheon Ryu,et al.  The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona , 2003 .

[38]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Learning and Learner-Control Modes in Computer-Based Instruction. , 1996 .

[39]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Cognitive and Affective Benefits of an Animated Pedagogical Agent for Learning English as a Second Language , 2006 .

[40]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[41]  Erin Shaw,et al.  Animated Pedagogical Agents: An Opportunity to be Grasped? , 2002 .