Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study

[1]  H. Barrett,et al.  Functional Fixedness in a Technologically Sparse Culture , 2005, Psychological science.

[2]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  R. Cressman.  Evolutionary Dynamics and Extensive Form Games , 2003 .

[4]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[5]  Kazuhiro Goto,et al.  Discrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeons , 2002, Animal Cognition.

[6]  C. Frith,et al.  Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[8]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  E. Dockner,et al.  Differential Games in Economics and Management Science , 2001 .

[10]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Uller,et al.  Goal attribution in chimpanzees , 2000, Cognition.

[12]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[14]  Susan C. Johnson.  The recognition of mentalistic agents in infancy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  R. Adolphs.  Social cognition and the human brain , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  G. Csibra,et al.  Goal attribution without agency cues: the perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy , 1999, Cognition.

[17]  Stewart W. Wilson,et al.  From Animals to Animats 5. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1997 .

[18]  A. Wiley.  Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine , 1997 .

[19]  S. Lea,et al.  Perception of Emotion from Dynamic Point-Light Displays Represented in Dance , 1996, Perception.

[20]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[21]  F. Eeckman,et al.  Evolution and Biocomputation: Computational Models of Evolution , 1995 .

[22]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[23]  S. Lea,et al.  Visual Perception of Intentional Motion , 1994, Perception.

[24]  Ken Springer,et al.  Structure, Motion, and Preschoolers' Perceptions of Social Causality , 1993 .

[25]  V. Crawford.  An “evolutionary” interpretation of Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil's experimental results on coordination , 1991 .

[26]  R. Fagen.  Animal Play Behavior , 1981 .

[27]  G. Johansson.  Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[28]  J. Jay Braun,et al.  Evolution and Human Behavior , 1967, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[29]  D Wishart,et al.  Differential Games. A Mathematical Theory with Applications to Warfare and Pursuit, Control and Optimization , 1966 .

[30]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[31]  György Gergely,et al.  One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  U. Goswami.  Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development , 2002 .

[33]  Francis F. Steen,et al.  Evolution's Pedagogy: An Adaptationist Model of Pretense and Entertainment , 2001 .

[34]  Angelo Antoci,et al.  Evolutionary Selection of Correlation Mechanisms for Coordination Games , 2000 .

[35]  M. Haselton,et al.  Error management theory: a new perspective on biases in cross-sex mind reading. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  U. Frith,et al.  Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .

[37]  Mauro Gallegati,et al.  Interaction and Market Structure , 2000 .

[38]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[39]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[40]  G. Miller.  Protean primates: The evolution of adaptive unpredictability in competition and courtship , 1997 .

[41]  R. Byrne,et al.  Machiavellian intelligence II : extensions and evaluations , 1997 .

[42]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Co-evolution of Pursuit and Evasion II: Simulation Methods and Results , 1996 .

[43]  Dave Cliff,et al.  Co-evolution of pursuit and evasion II: Simulation Methods and results , 1996 .

[44]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  The Role of Mate Choice in Biocomputation: Sexual Selection as a Process of Search, Optimization and Diversification , 1995, Evolution and Biocomputation.

[45]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[46]  P. Mineau,et al.  Forced Copulation in Waterfowl , 1983 .